3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Arthropod–bacteria interactions influence assembly of aquatic host microbiome and pathogen defense

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The host-associated microbiome is vital to host immunity and pathogen defense. In aquatic ecosystems, organisms may interact with environmental bacteria to influence the pool of potential symbionts, but the effects of these interactions on host microbiome assembly and pathogen resistance are unresolved. We used replicated bromeliad microecosystems to test for indirect effects of arthropod–bacteria interactions on host microbiome assembly and pathogen burden, using tadpoles and the fungal amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis as a model host–pathogen system. Arthropods influenced host microbiome assembly by altering the pool of environmental bacteria, with arthropod–bacteria interactions specifically reducing host colonization by transient bacteria and promoting antimicrobial components of aquatic bacterial communities. Arthropods also reduced fungal zoospores in the environment, but fungal infection burdens in tadpoles corresponded most closely with arthropod-mediated patterns in microbiome assembly. This result indicates that the cascading effects of arthropods on the maintenance of a protective host microbiome may be more strongly linked to host health than negative effects of arthropods on pools of pathogenic zoospores. Our work reveals tight links between healthy ecosystem dynamics and the functioning of host microbiomes, suggesting that ecosystem disturbances such as loss of arthropods may have downstream effects on host-associated microbial pathogen defenses and host fitness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Emerging infectious disease and the loss of biodiversity in a Neotropical amphibian community.

          Pathogens rarely cause extinctions of host species, and there are few examples of a pathogen changing species richness and diversity of an ecological community by causing local extinctions across a wide range of species. We report the link between the rapid appearance of a pathogenic chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in an amphibian community at El Copé, Panama, and subsequent mass mortality and loss of amphibian biodiversity across eight families of frogs and salamanders. We describe an outbreak of chytridiomycosis in Panama and argue that this infectious disease has played an important role in amphibian population declines. The high virulence and large number of potential hosts of this emerging infectious disease threaten global amphibian diversity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis gen. et sp. nov., a Chytrid Pathogenic to Amphibians

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Enzootic and epizootic dynamics of the chytrid fungal pathogen of amphibians.

              Chytridiomycosis, the disease caused by the chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), has contributed to amphibian population declines and extinctions worldwide. The impact of this pathogen, however, varies markedly among amphibian species and populations. Following invasion into some areas of California's Sierra Nevada, Bd leads to rapid declines and local extinctions of frog populations (Rana muscosa, R. sierrae). In other areas, infected populations of the same frog species have declined but persisted at low host densities for many years. We present results of a 5-year study showing that infected adult frogs in persistent populations have low fungal loads, are surviving between years, and frequently lose and regain the infection. Here we put forward the hypothesis that fungal load dynamics can explain the different population-level outcomes of Bd observed in different areas of the Sierra Nevada and possibly throughout the world. We develop a model that incorporates the biological details of the Bd-host interaction. Importantly, model results suggest that host persistence versus extinction does not require differences in host susceptibility, pathogen virulence, or environmental conditions, and may be just epidemic and endemic population dynamics of the same host-pathogen system. The different disease outcomes seen in natural populations may result solely from density-dependent host-pathogen dynamics. The model also shows that persistence of Bd is enhanced by the long-lived tadpole stage that characterize these two frog species, and by nonhost Bd reservoirs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                Proc. R. Soc. B
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                June 19 2019
                June 26 2019
                June 26 2019
                June 26 2019
                : 286
                : 1905
                : 20190924
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA
                [2 ]Department of Zoology and Aquaculture Center (CAUNESP), Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP 13506-900, Brazil
                [3 ]Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’, São José do Rio Preto SP 15054-000, Brazil
                [4 ]Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA
                [5 ]Fundação Parque Zoológico de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 04301-905, Brazil
                [6 ]Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP 13083-862, Brazil
                [7 ]Laboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros (LaHNAB), Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP 13083-862, Brazil
                [8 ]Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas SP 13083-862, Brazil
                Article
                10.1098/rspb.2019.0924
                6599996
                31238845
                4eb87589-361e-40f2-bdba-9ef573f24cf9
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article