2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A pathway to excellence

      editorial
      ,
      Clínica y Salud
      Colegio Oficial de la Psicología de Madrid

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating the evidential value of empirically supported psychological treatments (ESTs): A meta-scientific review.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Doing a systematic review in health sciences

            ABSTRACT This paper aims to provide a practical, summarized, and clear guide of steps to carry out a systematic review and is aimed at researchers in the field of Health Sciences. The review process runs from the initial questioning to the final report, providing useful information on tools available at each stage. Systematic review and meta-analysis are currently the evidence synthesis tools of the highest level of scientific quality. They are in themselves a secondary research methodology, whose objective is to locate, evaluate, and synthesize the best evidence by selecting original papers or quality primary publications. The procedure to achieve the objective is presented as a sequential and systematized process, in stages, following the transparency principle, so as to ensure its replicability.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Directrices para la Redacción de Estudios de Caso en Psicología Clínica: PHYSCHOCARE Guidelines

              RESUMEN La publicación continua de estudios de casos en la literatura psicológica pone de relieve la utilidad de esta alternativa para comunicar resultados entre investigadores y profesionales. Este artículo contiene recomendaciones de buenas prácticas para escribir estudios de casos clínicos, series de casos y estudios de diseños experimentales de caso único en psicología clínica, con el fin de mejorar la transparencia en la comunicación de los resultados y aumentar su posibilidad de publicación. Estas pautas sintetizan las recomendaciones de la psicología basada en la evidencia y los estudios de casos sistemáticos, así como las tendencias actuales en el análisis estadístico para este tipo de diseños. Se indican las secciones a incluir, una breve descripción del contenido a desarrollar en cada una de ellas y los aspectos éticos a tener en cuenta en la preparación de estos manuscritos.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                clinsa
                Clínica y Salud
                Clínica y Salud
                Colegio Oficial de la Psicología de Madrid (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                1130-5274
                2174-0550
                2020
                : 31
                : 3
                : 125-126
                Affiliations
                [01] orgnameNational Open University Spain
                [02] orgnameUniversity of Oviedo Spain
                Article
                S1130-52742020000300001 S1130-5274(20)03100300001
                10.5093/clysa2020a31
                4ed8dfea-dba0-489d-968e-6e5277b773e1

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 5, Pages: 2
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Editorial

                Comments

                Comment on this article