101
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A review of health behaviour theories: how useful are these for developing interventions to promote long-term medication adherence for TB and HIV/AIDS?

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4
      BMC Public Health
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Suboptimal treatment adherence remains a barrier to the control of many infectious diseases, including tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS, which contribute significantly to the global disease burden. However, few of the many interventions developed to address this issue explicitly draw on theories of health behaviour. Such theories could contribute to the design of more effective interventions to promote treatment adherence and to improving assessments of the transferability of these interventions across different health issues and settings.

          Methods

          This paper reviews behaviour change theories applicable to long-term treatment adherence; assesses the evidence for their effectiveness in predicting behaviour change; and examines the implications of these findings for developing strategies to improve TB and HIV/AIDS medication adherence. We searched a number of electronic databases for theories of behaviour change. Eleven theories were examined.

          Results

          Little empirical evidence was located on the effectiveness of these theories in promoting adherence. However, several models have the potential to both improve understanding of adherence behaviours and contribute to the design of more effective interventions to promote adherence to TB and HIV/AIDS medication.

          Conclusion

          Further research and analysis is needed urgently to determine which models might best improve adherence to long-term treatment regimens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Health Belief Model: a decade later.

          Since the last comprehensive review in 1974, the Health Belief Model (HBM) has continued to be the focus of considerable theoretical and research attention. This article presents a critical review of 29 HBM-related investigations published during the period of 1974-1984, tabulates the findings from 17 studies conducted prior to 1974, and provides a summary of the total 46 HBM studies (18 prospective, 28 retrospective). Twenty-four studies examined preventive-health behaviors (PHB), 19 explored sick-role behaviors (SRB), and three addressed clinic utilization. A "significance ratio" was constructed which divides the number of positive, statistically-significant findings for an HBM dimension by the total number of studies reporting significance levels for that dimension. Summary results provide substantial empirical support for the HBM, with findings from prospective studies at least as favorable as those obtained from retrospective research. "Perceived barriers" proved to be the most powerful of the HBM dimensions across the various study designs and behaviors. While both were important overall, "perceived susceptibility" was a stronger contributor to understanding PHB than SRB, while the reverse was true for "perceived benefits." "Perceived severity" produced the lowest overall significance ratios; however, while only weakly associated with PHB, this dimension was strongly related to SRB. On the basis of the evidence compiled, it is recommended that consideration of HBM dimensions be a part of health education programming. Suggestions are offered for further research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Meta-Analysis of Research on Protection Motivation Theory

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors.

              How people intentionally change addictive behaviors with and without treatment is not well understood by behavioral scientists. This article summarizes research on self-initiated and professionally facilitated change of addictive behaviors using the key trans-theoretical constructs of stages and processes of change. Modification of addictive behaviors involves progression through five stages--pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance--and individuals typically recycle through these stages several times before termination of the addiction. Multiple studies provide strong support for these stages as well as for a finite and common set of change processes used to progress through the stages. Research to date supports a trans-theoretical model of change that systematically integrates the stages with processes of change from diverse theories of psychotherapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                2007
                11 June 2007
                : 7
                : 104
                Affiliations
                [1 ]South African Cochrane Centre, Medical Research Council of South Africa, P.O. Box 19070, Tygerberg 7505, Cape Town, South Africa
                [2 ]Health Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa and Department of Public Health and Policy London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street London WC1E7 HT, UK
                [3 ]Department of Psychology School of Human & Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand Private Bag X3, Wits, 2050, South Africa
                [4 ]South African Cochrane Centre, Medical Research Council of South Africa and Deputy Dean: Research Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University PO Box 19063, Tygerberg 7505, Cape Town, South Africa
                Article
                1471-2458-7-104
                10.1186/1471-2458-7-104
                1925084
                17561997
                4eecef77-b664-4b00-aa9e-4e87344f2682
                Copyright © 2007 Munro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 August 2006
                : 11 June 2007
                Categories
                Research Article

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article