5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prognostic Implication of Persistent Human Papillomavirus Type 16 DNA Detection in Oral Rinses for Human Papillomavirus–Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          IMPORTANCE

          Human papillomavirus–related oropharyngeal carcinoma (HPV-OPC) is increasing in incidence in the United States. Although HPV-OPC has favorable prognosis, 10% to 25% of HPV-OPCs recur. Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in oral rinses is associated with HPV-OPC, but its potential as a prognostic biomarker is unclear.

          OBJECTIVE

          To determine whether HPV DNA detection in oral rinses after treatment for HPV-OPC is associated with recurrence and survival.

          DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

          Prospective cohort study of patients with incident HPV-OPC diagnosed from 2009 to 2013 at 4 academic tertiary referral cancer centers in the United States. Oral rinse samples were collected at diagnosis and after treatment (9, 12, 18, and 24 months after diagnosis), and evaluated for HPV DNA. Among an initial cohort of 157 participants with incident HPV-OPC treated with curative intent, 124 had 1 or more posttreatment oral rinses available and were included in this study.

          MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

          Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the association of HPV DNA detection in oral rinses with survival was evaluated using Cox regression analysis.

          RESULTS

          Oral HPV type 16 (HPV16) DNA was common at diagnosis (67 of 124 participants [54%]). In contrast, oral HPV16 DNA was detected in only 6 participants after treatment (5%), including 5 with HPV16 DNA also detected at diagnosis (persistent oral HPV16 DNA). Two-year DFS and OS were 92% (95% CI, 94%-100%) and 98% (95% CI, 93%-99%). Persistent oral HPV16 DNA was associated with worse DFS (hazard ratio, 29.7 [95% CI, 9.0-98.2]) and OS (hazard ratio, 23.5 [95% CI, 4.7-116.9]). All 5 participants with persistent oral HPV16 DNA developed recurrent disease, 3 with local disease involvement. In contrast, just 9 of 119 participants (8%) without persistent oral HPV16 DNA developed recurrent disease, only 1 (11%) with local disease involvement. Median (range) time from earliest posttreatment oral HPV16 DNA detection to recurrence was 7.0 (3.7-10.9) months.

          CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

          Human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in oral rinses is common at diagnosis but rare after treatment for HPV-OPC. Our data suggest that, although infrequent, persistent HPV16 DNA in posttreatment oral rinses is associated with poor prognosis and is a potential tool for long-term tumor surveillance, perhaps more so for local recurrence.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          101652861
          43608
          JAMA Oncol
          JAMA Oncol
          JAMA oncology
          2374-2437
          2374-2445
          14 May 2020
          October 2015
          10 June 2020
          : 1
          : 7
          : 907-915
          Affiliations
          Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
          Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
          Tisch Cancer Institute, Head and Neck Oncology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York
          Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
          Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
          Viral Oncology Program, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
          Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
          Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
          Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
          Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
          Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
          Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
          Viral Oncology Program, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
          Viral Oncology Program, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
          Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York
          Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
          Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
          Tisch Cancer Institute, Head and Neck Oncology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York
          Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
          Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
          Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans
          Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Gypsyamber D’Souza, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, E6132B, Baltimore, MD 21205 ( gdsouza2@ 123456jhu.edu ).

          Author Contributions: Dr D’Souza had access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

          Study concept and design: Posner, Haddad, Gillison, Fakhry, D’Souza.

          Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Rettig, Wentz, Posner, Gross, Haddad, Gillison, Fakhry, Quon, Sikora, Stott, Lorch, Gourin, Guo, Xiao, Miles, Richmon, Anderson, Misiukiewicz, Chung, Gerber, Rajan, D’Souza.

          Drafting of the manuscript: Rettig, Wentz, Posner, Haddad, Gillison, Fakhry, Lorch, Xiao, D’Souza.

          Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Rettig, Posner, Gross, Haddad, Gillison, Fakhry, Quon, Sikora, Stott, Lorch, Gourin, Guo, Miles, Richmon, Anderson, Misiukiewicz, Chung, Gerber, Rajan, D’Souza.

          Statistical analysis: Rettig, Wentz, D’Souza.

          Obtained funding: Posner, D’Souza.

          Administrative, technical, or material support: Posner, Gross, Haddad, Guo, Xiao, Miles, Richmon, Misiukiewicz, Chung, Gerber, Rajan, D’Souza.

          Study supervision: Posner, Haddad, Gillison, Fakhry, Miles, Anderson, D’Souza.

          Article
          PMC7286348 PMC7286348 7286348 nihpa1590668
          10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2524
          7286348
          26226294
          4f1891da-592c-4a8e-b733-c5b594f64f09
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article