26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Error-Free DNA Damage Tolerance and Sister Chromatid Proximity during DNA Replication Rely on the Polα/Primase/Ctf4 Complex

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Chromosomal replication is entwined with DNA damage tolerance (DDT) and chromatin structure establishment via elusive mechanisms. Here we examined how specific replication conditions affecting replisome architecture and repriming impact on DDT. We show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae Polα/Primase/Ctf4 mutants, proficient in bulk DNA replication, are defective in recombination-mediated damage-bypass by template switching (TS) and have reduced sister chromatid cohesion. The decrease in error-free DDT is accompanied by increased usage of mutagenic DDT, fork reversal, and higher rates of genome rearrangements mediated by faulty strand annealing. Notably, the DDT defects of Polα/Primase/Ctf4 mutants are not the consequence of increased sister chromatid distance, but are instead caused by altered single-stranded DNA metabolism and abnormal replication fork topology. We propose that error-free TS is driven by timely replicative helicase-coupled re-priming. Defects in this event impact on replication fork architecture and sister chromatid proximity, and represent a frequent source of chromosome lesions upon replication dysfunctions.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • Polα/Primase and cohesin support damage tolerance and sister chromatid proximity

          • Artificial cohesion bypasses cohesin, but not Polα/Primase role in recombination

          • Defects in Polα/Primase cause faulty strand annealing and reversed fork formation

          • Altered ssDNA metabolism underlies Polα/Primase mutants damage tolerance defects

          Abstract

          Fumasoni et al. explore the interplay between replication, sister chromatid cohesion, and recombination. Recombination and cohesion are facilitated by both cohesin and replication-fork-coupled re-priming. Cohesin does so by keeping the sister chromatids together, whereas replication-fork-coupled re-priming sustains normal fork architecture required for optimal cohesion and recombination-mediated DNA damage tolerance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO.

          The RAD6 pathway is central to post-replicative DNA repair in eukaryotic cells; however, the machinery and its regulation remain poorly understood. Two principal elements of this pathway are the ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes RAD6 and the MMS2-UBC13 heterodimer, which are recruited to chromatin by the RING-finger proteins RAD18 and RAD5, respectively. Here we show that UBC9, a small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)-conjugating enzyme, is also affiliated with this pathway and that proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) -- a DNA-polymerase sliding clamp involved in DNA synthesis and repair -- is a substrate. PCNA is mono-ubiquitinated through RAD6 and RAD18, modified by lysine-63-linked multi-ubiquitination--which additionally requires MMS2, UBC13 and RAD5--and is conjugated to SUMO by UBC9. All three modifications affect the same lysine residue of PCNA, suggesting that they label PCNA for alternative functions. We demonstrate that these modifications differentially affect resistance to DNA damage, and that damage-induced PCNA ubiquitination is elementary for DNA repair and occurs at the same conserved residue in yeast and humans.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids.

            Cohesion between sister chromatids opposes the splitting force exerted by microtubules, and loss of this cohesion is responsible for the subsequent separation of sister chromatids during anaphase. We describe three chromosmal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids in yeast. Two, Smc1p and Smc3p, are members of the SMC family, which are putative ATPases with coiled-coil domains. A third protein, which we call Scc1p, binds to chromosomes during S phase, dissociates from them at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition, and is degraded by the anaphase promoting complex. Association of Scc1p with chromatin depends on Smc1p. Proteins homologous to Scc1p exist in a variety of eukaryotic organisms including humans. A common cohesion apparatus might be used by all eukaryotic cells during both mitosis and meiosis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork.

              Aberrant DNA replication is a major source of the mutations and chromosome rearrangements that are associated with pathological disorders. When replication is compromised, DNA becomes more prone to breakage. Secondary structures, highly transcribed DNA sequences and damaged DNA stall replication forks, which then require checkpoint factors and specialized enzymatic activities for their stabilization and subsequent advance. These mechanisms ensure that the local DNA damage response, which enables replication fork progression and DNA repair in S phase, is coupled with cell cycle transitions. The mechanisms that operate in eukaryotic cells to promote replication fork integrity and coordinate replication with other aspects of chromosome maintenance are becoming clear.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Mol Cell
                Mol. Cell
                Molecular Cell
                Cell Press
                1097-2765
                1097-4164
                05 March 2015
                05 March 2015
                : 57
                : 5
                : 812-823
                Affiliations
                [1 ]IFOM, the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy
                [2 ]Institute of Molecular Cancer Research, University of Zurich, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author dana.branzei@ 123456ifom.eu
                [3]

                Present address: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA

                Article
                S1097-2765(14)01016-8
                10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.038
                4352764
                25661486
                4f18b1bb-a332-4300-a65d-9181106baad4
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 27 August 2014
                : 15 November 2014
                : 22 December 2014
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article