Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: not found
  • Article: not found

Publish or perish: how Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000–2015

, ,

Scientometrics

Springer Nature

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 42

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data

      The growing competition and “publish or perish” culture in academia might conflict with the objectivity and integrity of research, because it forces scientists to produce “publishable” results at all costs. Papers are less likely to be published and to be cited if they report “negative” results (results that fail to support the tested hypothesis). Therefore, if publication pressures increase scientific bias, the frequency of “positive” results in the literature should be higher in the more competitive and “productive” academic environments. This study verified this hypothesis by measuring the frequency of positive results in a large random sample of papers with a corresponding author based in the US. Across all disciplines, papers were more likely to support a tested hypothesis if their corresponding authors were working in states that, according to NSF data, produced more academic papers per capita. The size of this effect increased when controlling for state's per capita R&D expenditure and for study characteristics that previous research showed to correlate with the frequency of positive results, including discipline and methodology. Although the confounding effect of institutions' prestige could not be excluded (researchers in the more productive universities could be the most clever and successful in their experiments), these results support the hypothesis that competitive academic environments increase not only scientists' productivity but also their bias. The same phenomenon might be observed in other countries where academic competition and pressures to publish are high.
        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: not found
        • Article: not found

        Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

         P O Seglen (1997)
          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.

            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Scientometrics
            Scientometrics
            Springer Nature
            0138-9130
            1588-2861
            June 2017
            March 9 2017
            June 2017
            : 111
            : 3
            : 1813-1837
            10.1007/s11192-017-2332-z
            © 2017

            http://www.springer.com/tdm

            Comments

            Comment on this article