71
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Low-Frequency rTMS on Aphasia in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Small clinical trials have reported that low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) might improve language recovery in patients with aphasia after stroke. However, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses studies have investigated the effect of rTMS on aphasia. The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of studies that explored the effects of low-frequency rTMS on aphasia in stroke patients.

          Methods

          We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, and Journals@Ovid for randomized controlled trials published between January 1965 and October 2013 using the keywords “aphasia OR language disorders OR anomia OR linguistic disorders AND repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS”. We used fixed- and random-effects models to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) and a 95% CI for the language outcomes.

          Results

          Seven eligible studies involving 160 stroke patients were identified in this meta-analysis. A significant effect size of 1.26 was found for the language outcome severity of impairment (95% CI = 0.80 to 1.71) without heterogeneity ( I 2  = 0%, P = 0.44). Further analyses demonstrated prominent effects for the naming subtest (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.87), repetition (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.92), writing (SMD = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.22), and comprehension (the Token test: SMD = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.07 to 1.09) without heterogeneity ( I 2  = 0%). The SMD of AAT and BDAE comprehension subtests was 0.32 (95% CI = −0.08 to 0.72) with moderate heterogeneity ( I 2  = 32%, P = 0.22). The effect size did not change significantly even when any one trial was eliminated. None of the patients from the 7 included articles reported adverse effects from rTMS.

          Conclusions

          Low-frequency rTMS with a 90% resting motor threshold that targets the triangular part of the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) has a positive effect on language recovery in patients with aphasia following stroke. Further well-designed studies with larger populations are required to ascertain the long-term effects of rTMS in aphasia treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?

          Motor impairment resulting from chronic stroke can have extensive physical, psychological, financial, and social implications despite available neurorehabilitative treatments. Recent studies in animals showed that direct epidural stimulation of the primary motor cortex surrounding a small infarct in the lesioned hemisphere (M1(lesioned hemisphere)) elicits improvements in motor function. In human beings, proof of principle studies from different laboratories showed that non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation and direct current stimulation that upregulate excitability within M1(lesioned hemisphere) or downregulate excitability in the intact hemisphere (M1(intact hemisphere)) results in improvement in motor function in patients with stroke. Possible mechanisms mediating these effects can include the correction of abnormally persistent interhemispheric inhibitory drive from M1(intact hemisphere) to M1(lesioned hemisphere) in the process of generation of voluntary movements by the paretic hand, a disorder correlated with the magnitude of impairment. In this paper we review these mechanistically oriented interventional approaches. WHAT NEXT?: These findings suggest that transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation could develop into useful adjuvant strategies in neurorehabilitation but have to be further assessed in multicentre clinical trials.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

            Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be applied in different paradigms to obtain a measure of various aspects of cortical excitability. These different TMS paradigms provide information about different neurotransmitter systems, enhance our understanding about the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric conditions, and in the future may be helpful as a guide for pharmacological interventions. In addition, repetitive TMS (rTMS) modulates cortical excitability beyond the duration of the rTMS trains themselves. Depending on rTMS parameters, a lasting inhibition or facilitation of cortical excitability can be induced. These effects can be demonstrated neurophysiologically or by combining rTMS with neuroimaging techniques. The effects do not remain limited to the cortical area directly targeted by rTMS, but affect a wider neural network transynaptically. Modulation of cortical excitability by rTMS may in the future be useful not only as a research tool but also as a therapeutic intervention in neurology, psychiatry, and neurorehabilitation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A proposed regional hierarchy in recovery of post-stroke aphasia.

              Activation studies in patients with aphasia due to stroke or tumours in the dominant hemisphere have revealed effects of disinhibition in ipsilateral perilesional and in contralateral homotopic cortical regions, referred to as collateral and transcallosal disinhibition. These findings were supported by studies with selective disturbance of cortical areas by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in healthy volunteers and in patients with focal brain lesions. Both, collateral as well as transcallosal disinhibition might be relevant for the compensation of lesions within a functional network. From these data a hierarchical organization of recovery of aphasia after stroke and of compensation of language defects due to brain tumours can be deduced, by which the reactivation of undamaged network areas of the ipsilateral hemisphere usually lead to better outcome than the involvement of homotopic contra-lateral regions. rTMS can be used to identify areas relevant for speech production and might play a role in treatment strategies targeted at modulating the activity of contralateral homotopic areas of the functional network which might interfere with language recovery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                18 July 2014
                : 9
                : 7
                : e102557
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Wuxi Tongren International Rehabilitation Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China
                [2 ]Wuxi Mental Health Center of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China
                [3 ]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
                University of Bologna, Italy
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: CLR GFZ JAL DLC. Performed the experiments: CLR GFZ XHZ HBG HT. Analyzed the data: CLR GFZ DLC JFH. Wrote the paper: CLR GFZ. Critical revision, final drafting and text approval: CLR CHJ DLC NX JAL.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-06203
                10.1371/journal.pone.0102557
                4103829
                25036386
                4f5733bc-9a06-4233-9fdf-a16c8381b6ea
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 10 February 2014
                : 20 June 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                The authors have no support or funding to report.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                Trauma Medicine
                Neurorehabilitation and Trauma
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Clinical Neurophysiology
                Health Care
                Physiotherapy
                Otorhinolaryngology
                Laryngology
                Speech-Language Pathology
                Speech Therapy

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article