0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Climate and agronomy, not genetics, underpin recent maize yield gains in favorable environments

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          After accounting for the effect of climate and improvements in agronomic management, we found the contribution of genetic technologies to increasing maize yield potential in favorable environments was substantially smaller than reported in previous studies. If genetic progress in yield potential is slowing in other environments and for other crops as well, future production gains will increasingly rely on yield gains from improved agronomic practices and/or increasing crop intensity where possible.

          Abstract

          Quantitative understanding of factors driving yield increases of major food crops is essential for effective prioritization of research and development. Yet previous estimates had limitations in distinguishing among contributing factors such as changing climate and new agronomic and genetic technologies. Here, we distinguished the separate contribution of these factors to yield advance using an extensive database collected from the largest irrigated maize-production domain in the world located in Nebraska (United States) during the 2005-to-2018 period. We found that 48% of the yield gain was associated with a decadal climate trend, 39% with agronomic improvements, and, by difference, only 13% with improvement in genetic yield potential. The fact that these findings were so different from most previous studies, which gave much-greater weight to genetic yield potential improvement, gives urgency to the need to reevaluate contributions to yield advances for all major food crops to help guide future investments in research and development to achieve sustainable global food security. If genetic progress in yield potential is also slowing in other environments and crops, future crop-yield gains will increasingly rely on improved agronomic practices.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture.

          Global food demand is increasing rapidly, as are the environmental impacts of agricultural expansion. Here, we project global demand for crop production in 2050 and evaluate the environmental impacts of alternative ways that this demand might be met. We find that per capita demand for crops, when measured as caloric or protein content of all crops combined, has been a similarly increasing function of per capita real income since 1960. This relationship forecasts a 100-110% increase in global crop demand from 2005 to 2050. Quantitative assessments show that the environmental impacts of meeting this demand depend on how global agriculture expands. If current trends of greater agricultural intensification in richer nations and greater land clearing (extensification) in poorer nations were to continue, ~1 billion ha of land would be cleared globally by 2050, with CO(2)-C equivalent greenhouse gas emissions reaching ~3 Gt y(-1) and N use ~250 Mt y(-1) by then. In contrast, if 2050 crop demand was met by moderate intensification focused on existing croplands of underyielding nations, adaptation and transfer of high-yielding technologies to these croplands, and global technological improvements, our analyses forecast land clearing of only ~0.2 billion ha, greenhouse gas emissions of ~1 Gt y(-1), and global N use of ~225 Mt y(-1). Efficient management practices could substantially lower nitrogen use. Attainment of high yields on existing croplands of underyielding nations is of great importance if global crop demand is to be met with minimal environmental impacts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050

            Several studies have shown that global crop production needs to double by 2050 to meet the projected demands from rising population, diet shifts, and increasing biofuels consumption. Boosting crop yields to meet these rising demands, rather than clearing more land for agriculture has been highlighted as a preferred solution to meet this goal. However, we first need to understand how crop yields are changing globally, and whether we are on track to double production by 2050. Using ∼2.5 million agricultural statistics, collected for ∼13,500 political units across the world, we track four key global crops—maize, rice, wheat, and soybean—that currently produce nearly two-thirds of global agricultural calories. We find that yields in these top four crops are increasing at 1.6%, 1.0%, 0.9%, and 1.3% per year, non-compounding rates, respectively, which is less than the 2.4% per year rate required to double global production by 2050. At these rates global production in these crops would increase by ∼67%, ∼42%, ∼38%, and ∼55%, respectively, which is far below what is needed to meet projected demands in 2050. We present detailed maps to identify where rates must be increased to boost crop production and meet rising demands.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                18 January 2022
                25 January 2022
                18 January 2022
                : 119
                : 4
                : e2113629119
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln , Lincoln, NE 68583-0915;
                [2] bDepartment of Statistics, University of Nebraska–Lincoln , Lincoln, NE 68583-0963
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: pgrassini2@ 123456unl.edu .

                Edited by Ken Giller, Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands; received July 24, 2021; accepted December 6, 2021 by Editorial Board Member Sean R. Cutler

                Author contributions: G.R., K.G.C., and P.G. designed research; G.R., J.P.M., F.A.T., R.H., and P.G. performed research; G.R., J.P.M., F.A.T., R.H., and P.G. analyzed data; and G.R., K.G.C., and P.G. wrote the paper.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5753-3869
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6992-1842
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9836-3878
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9775-3468
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7501-842X
                Article
                202113629
                10.1073/pnas.2113629119
                8795556
                35042796
                4f5a4493-fb5d-4053-b77d-b24fc0e1e3c8
                Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

                History
                : 06 December 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Product
                Funding
                Funded by: Robert Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute
                Award ID: -
                Award Recipient : Patricio Grassini
                Funded by: Nebraska Corn Board
                Award ID: -
                Award Recipient : Patricio Grassini
                Funded by: USDA | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) 100005825
                Award ID: Hatch NEB-22-373
                Award Recipient : Patricio Grassini
                Funded by: USDA | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) 100005825
                Award ID: AFRI #12431808
                Award Recipient : Patricio Grassini
                Categories
                401
                Biological Sciences
                Agricultural Sciences

                climate,agronomy,genetics,yield gain,yield potential
                climate, agronomy, genetics, yield gain, yield potential

                Comments

                Comment on this article