11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hotline sessions of the 30th European Congress of Cardiology

      letter
      European Heart Journal
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          I read with interest the summary of the hotline sessions of this year's ESC Congress provided by Bergman et al. 1 The paper discusses the results of the F.I.R.E. study, which investigated the effect of a new drug, FX06 (fibrin-derived peptide Bβ15-42), for the prevention of ischaemia/reperfusion injury in the setting of acute STEMI, which we presented at hotline III. We think that the conclusion given in the EHJ that FX06 failed to significantly reduce reperfusion injury parameters in this STEMI population does not provide a fair judgement to the interesting results obtained in this trial. There is ample evidence from the literature that even small reductions in permanently damaged myocardium measured acutely after STEMI have the potential to provide sustained benefit for patients. 2 This has been specifically demonstrated for microvascular obstruction by several groups, who found this parameter to by an independent predictor of long-term patient outcome. 3,4 In this context, the reduction of the mass of unrecoverable myocardium by >50% is a very remarkable finding. It should also be noted that both the incidence and extent of microvascular obstructions trended lower in FX06-treated patients, even though the difference did not reach statistical significance. Interestingly, there were also trends in favour of FX06 in cardiac events, including cardiac death and new onset heart failure, which are encouraging and warrant further investigation in larger trials. We would also like to put the apparent lack of difference to placebo in scar mass measured at 4 months into perspective. Patients were followed for 4 months primarily for safety reasons, looking for cardiac death and MACE. It is important to take into account that most MACE as a sequel of the index infarction occur early after PCI, so the acute size of the infarct has very strong relevance for patient outcome. For instance, in the recently published APEX-AMI trial, the combined event rate of cardiac death, CHF, and shock was 9.1% at 30 days, and increased only marginally to 10.2% at 90 days. 5 Second CMR imaging at 4 months was done in the F.I.R.E. trial to assess whether FX06 treatment had an effect on scar formation; however, it was unlikely that a significant effect would be demonstrated, since this was just a single bolus treatment and we did not control for confounding effects and medication during the follow-up period. Scar mass was indeed numerically, but not significantly, lower at the 4 month time point compared with placebo. The study design did not allow for any evaluation of infarct expansion or shrinkage with respect to necrotic core size at 5 days and scar size at 4 months. More importantly, 15% of patients (FX06 14, placebo 16) did not return for repeat CMR at 4 months. This included, of course, patients who died from cardiac cause, five in the placebo group and only two in the FX06 group; this unequal loss to follow up leads to a distortion because patients who died could be considered of having large infarctions. The follow-up data are further distorted by the likelihood that more large infarcts were followed up in the FX06- treated group. Analysis of only patients with paired CMR images (completers) showed no difference in infarct size relative to LV mass in patients treated with FX06 at Day 5 and 4 months, whereas shrinkage by approximately 50% was observed in the placebo group. However, analysis of completers only introduces another selection bias. It is possible that the infarcts of patients treated with FX06 were already so small that there was not much apparent shrinkage during remodelling (unlike under placebo). Remodelling with scar shrinkage is actually an ominous sign that may lead to wall thinning, so the lack of shrinkage in the FX06 patients may be seen as beneficial. In summary, we would like to emphasize that the F.I.R.E. study as an exploratory trial provided a very consistent set of data suggesting a cardioprotective role of FX06 achieved by a reduction of ischaemia/reperfusion injury. The full study results have just been published. 6 Funding Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by Prof. Dan Atar.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced CMR early after acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a regional STEMI network: results of the "Herzinfarktverbund Essen".

          In acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), rapid restoration of epicardial coronary blood flow and myocardial perfusion limits infarct size and improves survival. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to systemic fibrinolysis when instantly performed by experienced operators. The "Herzinfarktverbund Essen" (HIVE) is an urban STEMI network supporting direct patient transfer for primary PCI to four PCI centers covering a city area of 600,000 inhabitants. Integrated health care is an optional part of the HIVE allowing for reimbursement of medical innovations such as the evaluation of infarct size and the presence and extent of microvascular obstruction by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced CMR in the patient cohort of a regional STEMI network. Within the 1st year (09/2004 to 08/2005) of the HIVE registry, 489 patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated in the four primary PCI centers. In one of the centers, including 143 patients, early CMR imaging using a standardized MR protocol for infarct quantification was performed whenever possible. Patients with hemodynamic instability, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, resuscitation or death prior to CMR, claustrophobia, and other general contraindications to MRI had to be excluded, leaving 67 patients (54 male; mean age 61 +/- 12 years) for final evaluation. CMR was performed 4.5 +/- 2.5 days after admission on a 1.5-T MR scanner (Sonata, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) including steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine imaging for left ventricular function and single-shot inversion-recovery SSFP imaging for delayed enhancement (DE) and no-reflow (NR) evaluation following injection of 0.2 mmol/kg body weight gadodiamide (Omniscan, GE Healthcare Buchler, Munich, Germany). NR and DE volumes were calculated from single-shot short-axis stacks taken within the 1st minute following gadodiamide infusion by manual planimetry and summation of disks. 1-year follow-up data (telephone interview) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for congestive heart failure, angina pectoris, or revascularization) were available for all patients. DE as a measure of infarct size was 9% +/- 7% (range 0-33%) of left ventricular mass (LVM), and mean volume of microvascular obstruction was 2% +/- 3% (range 0-17%). Microvascular obstruction was present in 61% of patients. 16 MACE (one cardiac death, one myocardial infarction, and 14 rehospitalizations for congestive heart failure or unstable angina pectoris with PCI in six cases) occurred within the follow-up period of 430 +/- 63 days. Patients with MACE had larger infarcts (14% +/- 10% vs. 8% +/- 6% DE), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF 44% +/- 17% vs. 48% +/- 14%) and larger NR (3% +/- 5% vs. 2% +/- 3%). Using a stepwise logistic regression model, only NR > 0.5% of LVM was independently related to outcome (odds ratio = 3.9, confidence interval 1.1-13.9). NR as a correlate of microvascular obstruction remains independently related to prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by PCI.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Pexelizumab and the APEX AMI Trial

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Pexelizumab for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Heart J
                eurheartj
                ehj
                European Heart Journal
                Oxford University Press
                0195-668X
                1522-9645
                May 2009
                1 April 2009
                1 April 2009
                : 30
                : 9
                : 1151
                Affiliations
                Division of Cardiology

                Aker University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine

                University of Oslo

                Norway

                Tel: +47 23 033 125

                Fax: +47 22 894 721

                Email: dan.atar@ 123456online.no
                Article
                ehp095
                10.1093/eurheartj/ehp095
                2675703
                19339265
                4f5f24ef-42a5-471c-8cc8-339267d1f4ff
                Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

                The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

                History
                Categories
                Letters to the Editor

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Cardiovascular Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article