8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The enormity of the challenges that inundated Psychiatric hospitals during the COVID-19 outbreak: Perspectives from a Psychiatric hospital in Guangzhou, China

      letter
      , *
      Asian Journal of Psychiatry
      Elsevier B.V.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an acute respiratory infectious disease caused by the newly discovered coronavirus. The World Health Organization (WHO) has listed it as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) (Kandel et al., 2020). In order to curb further development and progression of the outbreak, China has adopted many measures, such as quarantine, lockdowns, community assistance, traffic restrictions, and community follow-up, etc., which have been pivotal in the prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Without any doubt, most countermeasures double as major challenges for medical workers and psychotic patients (Liu et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2020). Scholars have also issued a call to pay attention to the occurrence of psychological problems during the COVID-19 epidemic (Tandon, 2020a, 2020b; Kelly, 2020). The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University is a grade 3A psychiatric hospital. It is a medical center for the diagnosis and treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases and difficult and complicated severe diseases, and a scientific research center and specialized personnel training base in South China, as well as the School of Mental Health of Guangzhou Medical University. Its main departments include Neurology, Mood Disorder, Traditional Chinese Medicine, Adult Psychiatry, Chronic Psychiatry, Geriatric Psychiatry, Child Psychiatry, Early Intervention, Substance Dependence, and Psychosomatic Medicine. In the first quarter, the number of outpatient and emergency visitors at our hospital equaled that within the same period of the previous year (the first quarter of 2020 vs the first quarter of 2019: 153,436 cases vs 155,271 cases) (Fig. 1 A). The number of inpatients was significantly lower than that in the same period of the previous year (the first quarter of 2020 vs the first quarter of 2019: 1201 cases vs 2219 cases) (Fig. 1B). The patients in the departments of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chronic Psychiatry, Child Psychiatry, Early Intervention, Substance Dependence, and Psychosomatic Medicine saw more than a 50 % drop when compared to the same period of the previous year (of which Child Psychiatry, Early Intervention, and Psychosomatic Medicine stopped inpatient services during the COVID-19 outbreak). Fig. 1 Comparison of outpatients and inpatients in the first quarter of 2020 with those in the same period of the previous year. A: The total number of outpatients in the first quarter of 2020 is compared with those in the same period of the previous year. B: The total number of inpatients in the first quarter of 2020 is compared with those in the same period of the previous year. C: The total number of inpatients in major departments in the first quarter of 2020 is compared with those in the same period of the previous year. * >50 % decrease from the same period of the previous year. # <50 % decrease from the same period of the previous year. Fig. 1 Although it is different from the "SARS" epidemic of 2003, the COVID-19 pandemic is characterized by long latent periods, involves many target organs, and asymptomatic carriers (Ye et al., 2020). In addition to gaining valuable time while clinging to all levels of departments, it has also brought heavy mental pressure to healthcare providers, grassroots cadres, and the masses on a growing scale (Chen et al., 2020; Yao et al., 2020). For example, the number of outpatient and emergency visitors at our hospital during the epidemic indicated that there was no significant reduction in the number of visitors when compared with the same period last year. In essence, it reflects the “profound” effects of the epidemic on people's mental and psychological states. Simultaneously, despite the decrease in the number of inpatients, there were high clinical demands for Neurology, Mood Disorder, Adult Psychiatry, Chronic Psychiatry, and Geriatric Psychiatry at our hospital under the premise of closing up some departments during the outbreak and by combining the declining percentage of inpatients within each department in comparison to the statistics of the previous year (Fig. 1C). A few factors should be considered: (1) During the outbreak, some patients with mild and moderate symptoms switched to outpatient services to reduce possible nosocomial infection. In this manner, there was an upsurge in the number of outpatient and emergency visitors. (2) During the epidemic, the psychological stress response was pronounced. People with prior mental and psychological disorders, even among the general population, could easily trigger sensitive, paranoid, anxious symptoms, and other stress responses. Thus, this increased the demand for medical treatment more ever than before. (3) There were no significant changes in subjects (patients with organic lesions, chronic diseases, and elderly patients) in for diagnosis and treatment in the Neurology, Mood Disorder, Adult Psychiatry, Chronic Psychiatry, and Geriatric Psychiatry departments during the COVID-19 outbreak. (4) During the disease outbreak, patients who caused trouble or accidents, tramps, mendicants, or suspected psychiatric patients were on the rise because some of the primary medical sites were closed temporarily due to the pandemic. As a result, they were sent to our hospital for COVID-19 testing and admitted for treatment if the results were positive. However, the development of COVID-19 is related to the temperatures (higher latitude), different early aggressive containment strategies, younger average age of populations, etc (Tandon, 2020b). Using our hospital as an example, the pressure from diagnosis and treatment in a psychiatric hospital skyrocketed during the COVID-19 outbreak from Southern China. We have proposed the following guidelines (and achieved some certain outcomes during the epidemic). Firstly, public health affairs should start from the grassroots to revamp public health psychological education and propagate mental health knowledge. In particular, healthcare providers should deliver mental health knowledge to the public via the Internet and other online platforms. This will help improve psychological counseling, psychological intervention, and other related systems. Therefore, people with psychological problems can be helped at the early stage (Supplementary material 1: Psychological education posters made during the COVID-19 outbreak by the Department of Community Mental Health of our hospital). Secondly, psychological assistance should be conducted for first-line medical workers to ensure that their psychological problems can be solved in a timely and effective manner during the anti-epidemic period. Thirdly, all professional psychiatric hospitals or psychiatric departments of general hospitals should strive to create smooth access to medical treatment, and guarantee patients who need to see a doctor or return to see a doctor can receive timely treatment in order to ensure the safety and stability of the society. Fourthly, considering the time spent by parents to accompany children and adolescents during the epidemic, some adolescent departments may appropriately cut down medical investment, and correspondingly increase the medical input in other departments, such as Neurology, Mood Disorder, Adult Psychiatry, Chronic Psychiatry, and Geriatric Psychiatry. Fifthly, the establishment of a work resumption clinic (that will rapidly and extensively carry out nucleic acid tests to provide health protection and support for the working people at all levels to resume work) is conducive to rapidly perform COVID-19 test in patients with mental and psychological disorders. It is the best “treatment method” for mentally ill patients to return to normal work and life as soon as possible. Author statement B.Y.Y and F.Y. wrote the first draft of the manuscript and prepared the figures and statistical analysis, C.J.Y. revised the manuscript and interpreted the results. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript. Financial disclosure There are no financial conflicts of interest to disclose. Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no declarations of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak

          In December, 2019, an outbreak of a novel coronavirus pneumonia occurred in Wuhan (Hubei, China), and subsequently attracted worldwide attention. 1 By Feb 9, 2020, there were 37 294 confirmed and 28 942 suspected cases of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in China. 2 Facing this large-scale infectious public health event, medical staff are under both physical and psychological pressure. 3 To better fight the COVID-19 outbreak, as the largest top-class tertiary hospital in Hunan Province, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University undertakes a considerable part of the investigation of suspected patients. The hospital has set up a 24-h fever clinic, two mild suspected infection patient screening wards, and one severe suspected infection patient screening ward. In addition to the original medical staff at the infectious disease department, volunteer medical staff have been recruited from multiple other departments. The Second Xiangya Hospital—workplace of the chairman of the Psychological Rescue Branch of the Chinese Medical Rescue Association—and the Institute of Mental Health, the Medical Psychology Research Center of the Second Xiangya Hospital, and the Chinese Medical and Psychological Disease Clinical Medicine Research Center responded rapidly to the psychological pressures on staff. A detailed psychological intervention plan was developed, which mainly covered the following three areas: building a psychological intervention medical team, which provided online courses to guide medical staff to deal with common psychological problems; a psychological assistance hotline team, which provided guidance and supervision to solve psychological problems; and psychological interventions, which provided various group activities to release stress. However, the implementation of psychological intervention services encountered obstacles, as medical staff were reluctant to participate in the group or individual psychology interventions provided to them. Moreover, individual nurses showed excitability, irritability, unwillingness to rest, and signs of psychological distress, but refused any psychological help and stated that they did not have any problems. In a 30-min interview survey with 13 medical staff at The Second Xiangya Hospital, several reasons were discovered for this refusal of help. First, getting infected was not an immediate worry to staff—they did not worry about this once they began work. Second, they did not want their families to worry about them and were afraid of bringing the virus to their home. Third, staff did not know how to deal with patients when they were unwilling to be quarantined at the hospital or did not cooperate with medical measures because of panic or a lack of knowledge about the disease. Additionally, staff worried about the shortage of protective equipment and feelings of incapability when faced with critically ill patients. Many staff mentioned that they did not need a psychologist, but needed more rest without interruption and enough protective supplies. Finally, they suggested training on psychological skills to deal with patients' anxiety, panic, and other emotional problems and, if possible, for mental health staff to be on hand to directly help these patients. Accordingly, the measures of psychological intervention were adjusted. First, the hospital provided a place for rest where staff could temporarily isolate themselves from their family. The hospital also guaranteed food and daily living supplies, and helped staff to video record their routines in the hospital to share with their families and alleviate family members' concerns. Second, in addition to disease knowledge and protective measures, pre-job training was arranged to address identification of and responses to psychological problems in patients with COVID-19, and hospital security staff were available to be sent to help deal with uncooperative patients. Third, the hospital developed detailed rules on the use and management of protective equipment to reduce worry. Fourth, leisure activities and training on how to relax were properly arranged to help staff reduce stress. Finally, psychological counsellors regularly visited the rest area to listen to difficulties or stories encountered by staff at work, and provide support accordingly. More than 100 frontline medical staff can rest in the provided rest place, and most of them report feeling at home in this accomodation. Maintaining staff mental health is essential to better control infectious diseases, although the best approach to this during the epidemic season remains unclear.4, 5 The learning from these psychological interventions is expected to help the Chinese government and other parts of the world to better respond to future unexpected infectious disease outbreaks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The experiences of health-care providers during the COVID-19 crisis in China: a qualitative study

            Summary Background In the early stages of the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei, China, the local health-care system was overwhelmed. Physicians and nurses who had no infectious disease expertise were recruited to provide care to patients with COVID-19. To our knowledge, no studies on their experiences of combating COVID-19 have been published. We aimed to describe the experiences of these health-care providers in the early stages of the outbreak. Methods We did a qualitative study using an empirical phenomenological approach. Nurses and physicians were recruited from five COVID-19-designated hospitals in Hubei province using purposive and snowball sampling. They participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews by telephone from Feb 10 to Feb 15, 2020. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Haase's adaptation of Colaizzi's phenomenological method. Findings We recruited nine nurses and four physicians. Three theme categories emerged from data analysis. The first was “being fully responsible for patients' wellbeing—‘this is my duty’”. Health-care providers volunteered and tried their best to provide care for patients. Nurses had a crucial role in providing intensive care and assisting with activities of daily living. The second category was “challenges of working on COVID-19 wards”. Health-care providers were challenged by working in a totally new context, exhaustion due to heavy workloads and protective gear, the fear of becoming infected and infecting others, feeling powerless to handle patients' conditions, and managing relationships in this stressful situation. The third category was “resilience amid challenges”. Health-care providers identified many sources of social support and used self-management strategies to cope with the situation. They also achieved transcendence from this unique experience. Interpretation The intensive work drained health-care providers physically and emotionally. Health-care providers showed their resilience and the spirit of professional dedication to overcome difficulties. Comprehensive support should be provided to safeguard the wellbeing of health-care providers. Regular and intensive training for all health-care providers is necessary to promote preparedness and efficacy in crisis management. Funding National Key R&D Program of China, Project of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education in China.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Patients with mental health disorders in the COVID-19 epidemic

              More than 60 000 infections have been confirmed worldwide in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, with most of these cases in China. Global attention has largely been focused on the infected patients and the frontline responders, with some marginalised populations in society having been overlooked. Here, we write to express our concerns with regards to the effect of the epidemic on people with mental health disorders. Ignorance of the differential impact of the epidemic on these patients will not only hinder any aims to prevent further spread of COVID-19, but will also augment already existing health inequalities. In China, 173 million people are living with mental health disorders, 1 and neglect and stigma regarding these conditions still prevail in society. 2 When epidemics arise, people with mental health disorders are generally more susceptible to infections for several reasons. First, mental health disorders can increase the risk of infections, including pneumonia. 3 One report released on Feb 9, 2020, discussing a cluster of 50 cases of COVID-19 among inpatients in one psychiatric hospital in Wuhan, China, has raised concerns over the role of mental disorders in coronavirus transmission. 4 Possible explanations include cognitive impairment, little awareness of risk, and diminished efforts regarding personal protection in patients, as well as confined conditions in psychiatric wards. Second, once infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2—which results in COVID-19—people with mental disorders can be exposed to more barriers in accessing timely health services, because of discrimination associated with mental ill-health in health-care settings. Additionally, mental health disorder comorbidities to COVID-19 will make the treatment more challenging and potentially less effective. 5 Third, the COVID-19 epidemic has caused a parallel epidemic of fear, anxiety, and depression. People with mental health conditions could be more substantially influenced by the emotional responses brought on by the COVID-19 epidemic, resulting in relapses or worsening of an already existing mental health condition because of high susceptibility to stress compared with the general population. Finally, many people with mental health disorders attend regular outpatient visits for evaluations and prescriptions. However, nationwide regulations on travel and quarantine have resulted in these regular visits becoming more difficult and impractical to attend. Few voices of this large but vulnerable population of people with mental health disorders have been heard during this epidemic. Epidemics never affect all populations equally and inequalities can always drive the spread of infections. As mental health and public health professionals, we call for adequate and necessary attention to people with mental health disorders in the COVID-19 epidemic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Asian J Psychiatr
                Asian J Psychiatr
                Asian Journal of Psychiatry
                Elsevier B.V.
                1876-2018
                1876-2026
                12 September 2020
                October 2020
                12 September 2020
                : 53
                : 102373
                Affiliations
                [0005]Department of Science and Education, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou 510370, China
                [0010]Office of the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou 510370, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Office of the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), No.36 Mingxin Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510370, China.
                Article
                S1876-2018(20)30486-X 102373
                10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102373
                7486619
                4f81b32b-e938-4c12-9c46-2e44ea655c4d
                © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 9 July 2020
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Comments

                Comment on this article