+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Effect of Two Indirectly Acting Dopamine Agonists on Prolactin Secretion in Normo- and Hyperprolactinemic Subjects: Comparison with the Effect of Nomifensine

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The effect on plasma prolactin (PRL) of two indirectly acting DA agonists (IADA), i.e., methylphenidate and amineptine was studied in normo- and hyperprolactinemic subjects. PRL responses to methylphenidate and amineptine were compared to those previously obtained with the use of another IADA, namely, nomifensine. In normoprolactinemic women methylphenidate (20 mg, orally) or amineptine (200 mg, orally) induced a significant decrease in baseline PRL (maximal change from baseline 50% at 90 min), a pattern reminiscent of that induced by nomifensine (maximal change from baseline 35% at 120 min). Likewise, in puerperal women (postpartum day 2) methylphenidate and amineptine induced a clear-cut lowering of baseline PRL (40% inhibition at 90 min and 180 min, respectively); nomifensine induced 60% inhibition of resting PRL levels at 150 min. In subjects with pathological hyperprolactinemia (proven or highly probable PRL-secreting tumor or uncertain etiology), previously shown to be unresponsive to the PRL-lowering effect of nomifensine, methylphenidate or amineptine did not significantly lower baseline PRL (maximal change from baseline 8% at 150 min and 3% at 90 min, respectively). In few of these subjects methylphenidate and amineptine failed to lower plasma PRL levels also at doses of 30 and 300 mg, orally, respectively. These data indicate that (1) two other IADA, i.e., methylphenidate and amineptine, are effective PRL-lowering agents in both normoprolactinemic and puerperal subjects, whereas they are unable to lower plasma PRL in patients with proven or probable PRL-secreting tumors; (2) the ability of the different drugs to inhibit plasma PRL in puerperal versus pathological hyperprolactinemia emphasizes the different tuberoinfundibular DA (TIDA) neurotransmission present in the two clinical conditions; (3) in view of the mechanism of action of the IADA, there is a defect in TIDA metabolism or transport in patients harboring a prolactinoma.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          26 March 2008
          : 33
          : 5
          : 300-305
          Chairs of Metabolic Diseases and Endocrinology, University of Turin, Italy; Chairs of Obstetric Pathology, University of Siena and Cagliari, Italy; St. Anna Gynecological Hospital, Turin, Italy; Department of Pharmacology, University of Milan, Italy
          123249 Neuroendocrinology 1981;33:300–305
          © 1981 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 6
          Original Paper


          Comment on this article