15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
4 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Digital Platforms and Artificial Intelligence in Dementia

      Submit here by August 31, 2025

      About Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders: 2.2 Impact Factor I 4.7 CiteScore I 0.809 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      Call for Papers: Epidemiology of CKD and its Complications

      Submit here by August 31, 2024

      About Kidney and Blood Pressure Research: 2.3 Impact Factor I 4.8 CiteScore I 0.674 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Immunogenicity and Safety of the Three-Dose COVID-19 Vaccine Regimen in Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          A three-dose regimen is the current standard for COVID-19 vaccination, but systematic data on immunogenicity and safety in chronic kidney disease patients remains limited.

          Objectives

          We conducted a meta-analysis on the immunogenicity and safety of three-dose COVID-19 vaccination in patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT).

          Methods

          Systematic literature search in four electronic databases yielded twenty eligible studies (2,117 patients, 94% of whom received mRNA vaccines) for meta-analysis.

          Results

          The overall seropositivity rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2 was 74.2% (95% CI: 65.0–83.4%) after three-dose COVID-19 vaccination. The seropositivity rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) was 64.6% (95% CI: 58.7–70.5%), and 43.5% (95% CI: 38.5–48.6%) of non-responders after second dose became seropositive after third dose. The seropositivity rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2 was 92.9% (95% CI: 89.5–96.2%) in dialysis patients, and 64.6% (95% CI: 46.8–82.3%) of non-responders after second dose became seropositive after third dose. In KTRs, each year increase in transplant vintage was associated with 35.6% increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (95% CI: 15.9–55.4%, p = 0.01). There were no serious adverse events attributed to vaccination in KTRs, and the commonest local and systemic adverse events were injection site pain and fatigue, respectively.

          Conclusion

          Three-dose COVID-19 vaccination regimen in patients on RRT is associated with reduced immunogenicity, especially in KTRs. There are no adverse events associated with third-dose COVID-19 vaccine in KTRs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

          Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection

            Predictive models of immune protection from COVID-19 are urgently needed to identify correlates of protection to assist in the future deployment of vaccines. To address this, we analyzed the relationship between in vitro neutralization levels and the observed protection from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection using data from seven current vaccines and from convalescent cohorts. We estimated the neutralization level for 50% protection against detectable SARS-CoV-2 infection to be 20.2% of the mean convalescent level (95% confidence interval (CI) = 14.4-28.4%). The estimated neutralization level required for 50% protection from severe infection was significantly lower (3% of the mean convalescent level; 95% CI = 0.7-13%, P = 0.0004). Modeling of the decay of the neutralization titer over the first 250 d after immunization predicts that a significant loss in protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection will occur, although protection from severe disease should be largely retained. Neutralization titers against some SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern are reduced compared with the vaccine strain, and our model predicts the relationship between neutralization and efficacy against viral variants. Here, we show that neutralization level is highly predictive of immune protection, and provide an evidence-based model of SARS-CoV-2 immune protection that will assist in developing vaccine strategies to control the future trajectory of the pandemic.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Correlates of protection against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection

              The global supply of COVID-19 vaccines remains limited. An understanding of the immune response that is predictive of protection could facilitate rapid licensure of new vaccines. Data from a randomized efficacy trial of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in the United Kingdom was analyzed to determine the antibody levels associated with protection against SARS-CoV-2. Binding and neutralizing antibodies at 28 days after the second dose were measured in infected and noninfected vaccine recipients. Higher levels of all immune markers were correlated with a reduced risk of symptomatic infection. A vaccine efficacy of 80% against symptomatic infection with majority Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant of SARS-CoV-2 was achieved with 264 (95% CI: 108, 806) binding antibody units (BAU)/ml: and 506 (95% CI: 135, not computed (beyond data range) (NC)) BAU/ml for anti-spike and anti-RBD antibodies, and 26 (95% CI: NC, NC) international unit (IU)/ml and 247 (95% CI: 101, NC) normalized neutralization titers (NF50) for pseudovirus and live-virus neutralization, respectively. Immune markers were not correlated with asymptomatic infections at the 5% significance level. These data can be used to bridge to new populations using validated assays, and allow extrapolation of efficacy estimates to new COVID-19 vaccines.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Kidney Dis (Basel)
                Kidney Dis (Basel)
                KDD
                KDD
                Kidney Diseases
                S. Karger AG (Basel, Switzerland )
                2296-9381
                2296-9357
                19 January 2024
                April 2024
                : 10
                : 2
                : 107-117
                Affiliations
                [a ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
                [b ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Desmond Yat Hin Yap, desmondy@ 123456hku.hk
                Article
                536308
                10.1159/000536308
                11095616
                38751793
                4fba56ed-73d6-457c-9440-a2d86a560e05
                © 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) ( http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.

                History
                : 20 August 2022
                : 12 January 2024
                : 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, References: 56, Pages: 11
                Funding
                There is no funding for this study. Desmond Yat-Hin Yap received research donations from the Wai Im Charitable Foundation and the Chan Sui Kau Family Benefits and Charitable Foundation. Desmond Yat-Hin Yap, Sydney Chi Wai Tang, and Tak Mao Chan received research funding support from the Mr. and Mrs. Tam Wing Fun Edmund Renal Research Fund. Tak Mao Chan received research funding support from the Wai Hung Charitable Foundation and Mr. S. Ho.
                Categories
                Systematic Review

                covid-19,vaccine,third dose,immunogenicity,safety,renal replacement therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log