46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Attentional Load Modulates Responses of Human Primary Visual Cortex to Invisible Stimuli

      brief-report
      1 , 2 , , 1 , 2 , 1 , 3
      Current Biology
      Cell Press
      SYSNEURO

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Visual neuroscience has long sought to determine the extent to which stimulus-evoked activity in visual cortex depends on attention and awareness. Some influential theories of consciousness maintain that the allocation of attention is restricted to conscious representations [1, 2]. However, in the load theory of attention [3], competition between task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimuli for limited-capacity attention does not depend on conscious perception of the irrelevant stimuli. The critical test is whether the level of attentional load in a relevant task would determine unconscious neural processing of invisible stimuli. Human participants were scanned with high-field fMRI while they performed a foveal task of low or high attentional load. Irrelevant, invisible monocular stimuli were simultaneously presented peripherally and were continuously suppressed by a flashing mask in the other eye [4]. Attentional load in the foveal task strongly modulated retinotopic activity evoked in primary visual cortex (V1) by the invisible stimuli. Contrary to traditional views [1, 2, 5, 6], we found that availability of attentional capacity determines neural representations related to unconscious processing of continuously suppressed stimuli in human primary visual cortex. Spillover of attention to cortical representations of invisible stimuli (under low load) cannot be a sufficient condition for their awareness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

          The ability to remain focused on goal-relevant stimuli in the presence of potentially interfering distractors is crucial for any coherent cognitive function. However, simply instructing people to ignore goal-irrelevant stimuli is not sufficient for preventing their processing. Recent research reveals that distractor processing depends critically on the level and type of load involved in the processing of goal-relevant information. Whereas high perceptual load can eliminate distractor processing, high load on "frontal" cognitive control processes increases distractor processing. These findings provide a resolution to the long-standing early and late selection debate within a load theory of attention that accommodates behavioural and neuroimaging data within a framework that integrates attention research with executive function.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.

            Global context plays an important, but poorly understood, role in visual tasks. This study demonstrates that a robust memory for visual context exists to guide spatial attention. Global context was operationalized as the spatial layout of objects in visual search displays. Half of the configurations were repeated across blocks throughout the entire session, and targets appeared within consistent locations in these arrays. Targets appearing in learned configurations were detected more quickly. This newly discovered form of search facilitation is termed contextual cueing. Contextual cueing is driven by incidentally learned associations between spatial configurations (context) and target locations. This benefit was obtained despite chance performance for recognizing the configurations, suggesting that the memory for context was implicit. The results show how implicit learning and memory of visual context can guide spatial attention towards task-relevant aspects of a scene.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages.

              Illusions that produce perceptual suppression despite constant retinal input are used to manipulate visual consciousness. Here we report on a powerful variant of existing techniques, continuous flash suppression. Distinct images flashed successively at approximately 10 Hz into one eye reliably suppress an image presented to the other eye. The duration of perceptual suppression is at least ten times greater than that produced by binocular rivalry. Using this tool we show that the strength of the negative afterimage of an adaptor was reduced by half when it was perceptually suppressed by input from the other eye. The more completely the adaptor was suppressed, the more strongly the afterimage intensity was reduced. Paradoxically, trial-to-trial visibility of the adaptor did not correlate with the degree of reduction. Our results imply that formation of afterimages involves neuronal structures that access input from both eyes but that do not correspond directly to the neuronal correlates of perceptual awareness.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Curr Biol
                Current Biology
                Cell Press
                0960-9822
                1879-0445
                20 March 2007
                20 March 2007
                : 17
                : 6
                : 509-513
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, Alexandra House, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author bbahrami@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Article
                CURBIO5433
                10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.070
                1885953
                17346967
                4fcba1b7-24ea-471f-b7f5-b670813c2bc2
                © 2007 ELL & Excerpta Medica.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 14 October 2006
                : 13 January 2007
                : 15 January 2007
                Categories
                Report

                Life sciences
                sysneuro
                Life sciences
                sysneuro

                Comments

                Comment on this article