8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Understanding Revictimization Among Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors: An Interpersonal Schema Approach

      , ,
      Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
      Springer Publishing Company

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Revictimization among women with a history of childhood sexual abuse was investigated within the context of a developmental model of interpersonal schemas. Data from the Interpersonal Schema Questionnaire (ISQ) revealed contrasting schema characteristics among sexually revictimized women (those sexually abused in childhood and sexually assaulted in adulthood) ( n = 26), compared to those only abused in childhood ( n = 18), and those never abused or assaulted ( n = 25). Both revictimized women and never victimized women significantly generalized their predominant parental schemas to current relationships and differed only in the content of the schemas. The generalized parental schema of revictimized women viewed others as hostile and controlling while that of never victimized women viewed others as warm and noncontrolling. Women who had only been abused in childhood held schemas of parents as hostile but not controlling and did not generalize from parental to current schemas. The tendency to generalize observed in the first two groups suggest that “repetition compulsion” is not limited to those who were traumatized and are psychologically distressed. In this article, reasons for the absence of generalization among the childhood abuse only group are explored and implications for the treatment of childhood trauma survivors are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women.

          Examined the accuracy with which rape and lesser sexual assaults were predicted among a representative national sample of 2,723 college women. A total of 14 risk variables operationalized three vulnerability hypotheses: (a) vulnerability-creating traumatic experiences, (b) social-psychological vulnerability, and (c) vulnerability-enhancing situations. Each hypothesis was tested individually, and a composite model was developed via discriminant analysis. Only the traumatic experiences variables clearly improved over the base rates in identifying rape victims, but risk variables from each vulnerability hypothesis met criteria for inclusion in the composite model. A risk profile emerged that characterized only 10% of the women, but among them the risk of rape was twice the rate of women without the profile. The concept of traumatic sexualization was used to explain this finding. However, the vast majority of sexually victimized women (75-91%) could not be differentiated from nonvictims.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Long-term correlates of child sexual abuse: Theory and review of the empirical literature

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The relationship of childhood sexual abuse with later psychological and sexual adjustment in a sample of college women

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
                J Cogn Psychother
                Springer Publishing Company
                0889-8391
                1938-887X
                March 01 2002
                March 2002
                March 2002
                March 01 2002
                : 16
                : 1
                : 91-111
                Article
                10.1891/jcop.16.1.91.63698
                4fd02ac8-7b2f-4c80-aa16-12d14695244b
                © 2002
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article