72
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Experimentally induced social inclusion influences behavior on trust games

      , ,
      Cognitive Neuroscience
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Being socially excluded is profoundly distressing. It is unknown whether exclusion renders victims vulnerable to manipulation or whether excluded individuals become more cautious about being exploited by, and less trusting of, the person who excluded them. We investigated this by testing how much participants trust people who have socially included or excluded them. Inclusion and exclusion were manipulated using Cyberball (a virtual ball game) and, after playing Cyberball, participants played trust games. In a Reputation group participants played trust games with players from Cyberball; in the No Reputation group, participants played with strangers. Inclusion/exclusion manipulation interacted with Group such that participants in the Reputation group trusted individuals who included them more than those who excluded them, whereas inclusion/exclusion made no difference to trust in the No-Reputation group. Our findings suggest that exclusion does not increase gullibility, but that reputation is transferred from a social to an economic setting so that social inclusion increases trust.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion.

          A neuroimaging study examined the neural correlates of social exclusion and tested the hypothesis that the brain bases of social pain are similar to those of physical pain. Participants were scanned while playing a virtual ball-tossing game in which they were ultimately excluded. Paralleling results from physical pain studies, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) was more active during exclusion than during inclusion and correlated positively with self-reported distress. Right ventral prefrontal cortex (RVPFC) was active during exclusion and correlated negatively with self-reported distress. ACC changes mediated the RVPFC-distress correlation, suggesting that RVPFC regulates the distress of social exclusion by disrupting ACC activity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ostracism.

              In this review, I examine the social psychological research on ostracism, social exclusion, and rejection. Being ignored, excluded, and/or rejected signals a threat for which reflexive detection in the form of pain and distress is adaptive for survival. Brief ostracism episodes result in sadness and anger and threaten fundamental needs. Individuals then act to fortify or replenish their thwarted need or needs. Behavioral consequences appear to be split into two general categories: attempts to fortify relational needs (belonging, self-esteem, shared understanding, and trust), which lead generally to prosocial thoughts and behaviors, or attempts to fortify efficacy/existence needs of control and recognition that may be dealt with most efficiently through antisocial thoughts and behaviors. Available research on chronic exposure to ostracism appears to deplete coping resources, resulting in depression and helplessness.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cognitive Neuroscience
                Cognitive Neuroscience
                Informa UK Limited
                1758-8928
                1758-8936
                January 27 2011
                January 27 2011
                : 2
                : 1
                : 27-33
                Article
                10.1080/17588928.2010.515020
                24168421
                4fd4a18e-9f40-49eb-86dd-ec5c18e580a9
                © 2011
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article