11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Character Strengths Profiles in Medical Professionals and Their Impact on Well-Being

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Character strengths profiles in the specific setting of medical professionals are widely unchartered territory. This paper focused on an overview of character strengths profiles of medical professionals (medical students and physicians) based on literature research and available empirical data illustrating their impact on well-being and work engagement. A literature research was conducted and the majority of peer-reviewed considered articles dealt with theoretical or conceptually driven ‘virtues’ associated with medical specialties or questions of ethics in patient care (e.g., professionalism, or what makes a good physician). The virtues of compassion, courage, altruism, and benevolence were described most often. Only a limited number of papers addressed character strengths of medical students or physicians according to the VIA-classification. Those articles showed that the VIA-character strengths fairness, honesty, kindness, and teamwork were considered most often by respondents to be particularly important for the medical profession. Available cross-sectional (time span: six years) and longitudinal (time span: three years) data regarding VIA-character strengths profiles of medical professionals were analyzed ( N = 584 medical students, 274 physicians). These profiles were quite homogenous among both groups. The character strengths fairness, honesty, judgment, kindness, and love had the highest means in both samples. Noteworthy differences appeared when comparing medical specialties, in particular concerning general surgeons and psychiatrists, with the former reporting clearly higher levels of e.g., honesty ( d = 1.02) or prudence ( d = 1.19). Long-term results revealed significant positive effects of character strengths on well-being and work engagement (e.g., perseverance on physicians’ work engagement) but also significant negative effects (e.g., appreciation of beauty and excellence on students’ well-being). Further, hope was significantly associated both positively with physicians’ well-being and negatively with students’ work engagement, possibly indicating specific issues concerning medical education or hospital working conditions. According to the modern-day physician’s pledge, medical professionals should pay attention to their own well-being and health. Therefore, promoting self-awareness and character building among medical professionals could be a beneficial strategy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references134

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Burnout among U.S. medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general U.S. population.

              To compare the prevalence of burnout and other forms of distress across career stages and the experiences of trainees and early career (EC) physicians versus those of similarly aged college graduates pursuing other careers. In 2011 and 2012, the authors conducted a national survey of medical students, residents/fellows, and EC physicians (≤ 5 years in practice) and of a probability-based sample of the general U.S. population. All surveys assessed burnout, symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation, quality of life, and fatigue. Response rates were 35.2% (4,402/12,500) for medical students, 22.5% (1,701/7,560) for residents/fellows, and 26.7% (7,288/27,276) for EC physicians. In multivariate models that controlled for relationship status, sex, age, and career stage, being a resident/fellow was associated with increased odds of burnout and being a medical student with increased odds of depressive symptoms, whereas EC physicians had the lowest odds of high fatigue. Compared with the population control samples, medical students, residents/fellows, and EC physicians were more likely to be burned out (all P < .0001). Medical students and residents/fellows were more likely to exhibit symptoms of depression than the population control samples (both P < .0001) but not more likely to have experienced recent suicidal ideation. Training appears to be the peak time for distress among physicians, but differences in the prevalence of burnout, depressive symptoms, and recent suicidal ideation are relatively small. At each stage, burnout is more prevalent among physicians than among their peers in the U.S. population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                23 December 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 566728
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck, Austria
                [2] 2Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck, Austria
                [3] 3Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck, Austria
                Author notes

                Edited by: Philippe Dubreuil, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada

                Reviewed by: Benjamin Dreer, University of Erfurt, Germany; Maria Christina Meyers, Tilburg University, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Stefan Höfer, stefan.hoefer@ 123456i-med.ac.at

                This article was submitted to Personality and Social Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566728
                7786021
                29277137
                4feb9530-1133-4ce9-9cb5-b28fec3c1534
                Copyright © 2020 Huber, Strecker, Kachel, Höge and Höfer.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 May 2020
                : 04 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 136, Pages: 20, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Austrian Science Fund 10.13039/501100002428
                Award ID: P27228-G22
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                character strengths profiles,via-classification,medical students,physicians,well-being,work engagement

                Comments

                Comment on this article