14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Principles of Antibacterial Dosing in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Appropriate antibacterial therapy is important to maximize patient survival in sepsis. Acute renal failure complicates optimal antibiotic administration. Methods: MEDLINE search from 1986 to 2010 using the terms ‘acute renal failure’, ‘pharmacokinetics’, ‘clearance’, ‘dosage’, ‘h(a)emofiltration’, ‘h(a)emodialysis’, ‘h(a)emodiafiltration’, ‘continuous renal replacement therapy’, ‘antibiotics’, ‘intensive care’ and ‘critically ill’. Results: Maximal bacterial killing and minimization of side effects depend on achieving pharmacokinetic targets appropriate to the selected antibacterial agent. Volume of distribution and clearance may be altered by critical illness and/or acute kidney injury. Clearance is determined by nonrenal clearance, residual renal clearance and continuous renal replacement therapy dose. Sieving and saturation coefficients are membrane specific, but may be altered by changes in protein binding induced by critical illness. A significant proportion of studies failed to report the essential dataset required for adequate antibacterial dosage calculation. Conclusions: Individualized dosing based on first principles may be the most appropriate method of dosing, particularly when enhanced by therapeutic drug monitoring.

          Related collections

          Most cited references104

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: clinical characteristics and outcomes.

          Sepsis is the most common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critical illness, but there is limited information on septic AKI. A prospective, observational study of critically ill patients with septic and nonseptic AKI was performed from September 2000 to December 2001 at 54 hospitals in 23 countries. A total of 1753 patients were enrolled. Sepsis was considered the cause in 833 (47.5%); the predominant sources of sepsis were chest and abdominal (54.3%). Septic AKI was associated with greater aberrations in hemodynamics and laboratory parameters, greater severity of illness, and higher need for mechanical ventilation and vasoactive therapy. There was no difference in enrollment kidney function or in the proportion who received renal replacement therapy (RRT; 72 versus 71%; P = 0.83). Oliguria was more common in septic AKI (67 versus 57%; P < 0.001). Septic AKI had a higher in-hospital case-fatality rate compared with nonseptic AKI (70.2 versus 51.8%; P < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, septic AKI remained associated with higher odds for death (1.48; 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.89; P = 0.001). Median (IQR) duration of hospital stay for survivors (37 [19 to 59] versus 21 [12 to 42] d; P < 0.0001) was longer for septic AKI. There was a trend to lower serum creatinine (106 [73 to 158] versus 121 [88 to 184] mumol/L; P = 0.01) and RRT dependence (9 versus 14%; P = 0.052) at hospital discharge for septic AKI. Patients with septic AKI were sicker and had a higher burden of illness and greater abnormalities in acute physiology. Patients with septic AKI had an increased risk for death and longer duration of hospitalization yet showed trends toward greater renal recovery and independence from RRT.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit.

            To develop definitions of infection that can be used in clinical trials in patients with sepsis. Infection is a key component of the definition of sepsis, yet there is currently no agreement on the definitions that should be used to identify specific infections in patients with sepsis. Agreeing on a set of valid definitions that can be easily implemented as part of a clinical trial protocol would facilitate patient selection, help classify patients into prospectively defined infection categories, and therefore greatly reduce variability between treatment groups. Experts in infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, and critical care medicine were recruited and allocated specific infection sites. They carried out a systematic literature review and used this, and their own experience, to prepare a draft definition. At a subsequent consensus conference, rapporteurs presented the draft definitions, and these were then refined and improved during discussion. Modifications were circulated electronically and subsequently agreed upon as part of an iterative process until consensus was reached. Consensus definitions of infection were developed for the six most frequent causes of infections in septic patients: pneumonia, bloodstream infections (including infective endocarditis), intravascular catheter-related sepsis, intra-abdominal infections, urosepsis, and surgical wound infections. We have described standardized definitions of the common sites of infection associated with sepsis in critically ill patients. Use of these definitions in clinical trials should help improve the quality of clinical research in this field.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Vancomycin therapeutic guidelines: a summary of consensus recommendations from the infectious diseases Society of America, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.

              Practice guidelines for therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin treatment for Staphylococcus aureus infection in adult patients were reviewed by an expert panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. A literature review of existing evidence regarding vancomycin dosing and monitoring of serum concentrations, in addition to patient outcomes combined with expert opinion regarding the drug's pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety record, resulted in new recommendations for targeting and adjustment of vancomycin therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BPU
                Blood Purif
                10.1159/issn.0253-5068
                Blood Purification
                S. Karger AG
                0253-5068
                1421-9735
                2010
                November 2010
                06 October 2010
                : 30
                : 3
                : 195-212
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China; bBurns, Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Qld., Australia
                Author notes
                *Dr. Gordon Choi, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, SAR (China), Tel. +852 2632 2734, Fax +852 2637 2422, E-Mail gchoi@cuhk.edu.hk
                Article
                321488 Blood Purif 2010;30:195–212
                10.1159/000321488
                20924175
                5041eeab-556a-47e5-afda-1c070823003d
                © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, Pages: 18
                Categories
                In-Depth Review

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Antibacterial agents,Acute renal failure,Continuous renal replacement therapy,Pharmacokinetics,Pharmacodynamics

                Comments

                Comment on this article