16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiological, Nuclear Medicine and Hybrid Imaging

      guideline

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the neck-thorax-abdomen and pelvis, including 3-phase examination of the liver, constitutes the basic imaging for primary neuroendocrine tumor (NET) diagnosis, staging, surveillance, and therapy monitoring. CT characterization of lymph nodes is difficult because of inadequate size criteria (short axis diameter), and bone metastases are often missed. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging is preferred for the examination of the liver, pancreas, brain and bone. MRI may miss small lung metastases. MRI is less well suited than CT for the examination of extended body areas because of the longer examination procedure. Ultrasonography (US) frequently provides the initial diagnosis of liver metastases and contrast-enhanced US is excellent to characterize liver lesions that remain equivocal on CT/MRI. US is the method of choice to guide the biopsy needle for the histopathological NET diagnosis. US cannot visualize thoracic NET lesions for which CT-guided biopsy therefore is used. Endocopic US is the most sensitive method to diagnose pancreatic NETs, and additionally allows for biopsy. Intraoperative US facilitates lesion detection in the pancreas and liver. Somatostatin receptor imaging should be a part of the tumor staging, preoperative imaging and restaging, for which <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTA-somatostatin analog PET/CT is recommended, which is vastly superior to somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and facilitates the diagnosis of most types of NET lesions, for example lymph node metastases, bone metastases, liver metastases, peritoneal lesions, and primary small intestinal NETs. <sup>18</sup>FDG-PET/CT is better suited for G3 and high G2 NETs, which generally have higher glucose metabolism and less somatostatin receptor expression than low-grade NETs, and additionally provides prognostic information.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          NEN
          Neuroendocrinology
          10.1159/issn.0028-3835
          Neuroendocrinology
          S. Karger AG
          978-3-318-06158-1
          978-3-318-06159-8
          0028-3835
          1423-0194
          2017
          September 2017
          30 March 2017
          : 105
          : 3
          : 212-244
          Affiliations
          aDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; bDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany; cDepartment of Endocrine Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; dDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland; eDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; fDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, and gUnit of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; hNuclear Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon and EMR3738, University of Lyon, Lyon, France; iCancer Imaging, the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; jDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; kDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; lInstitut du Cancer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France; mAlexander Fleming Institute, Gastroenterology Hospital B. Udaondo, Buenos Aires, Argentina; nTrinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, St James's Hospital and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; oDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, and Imperial College London, London, UK; pDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; qInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester/The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; rService de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
          Author notes
          *Anders Sundin, Department of Radiology, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala (Sweden), E-Mail anders.sundin@radiol.uu.se
          Author information
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6869-0704
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0758-0824
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-0863
          Article
          471879 Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:212-244
          10.1159/000471879
          28355596
          507dbe49-662d-453b-a447-4dcf68347cc8
          © 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          History
          : 05 December 2016
          : 21 March 2017
          Page count
          Figures: 19, Tables: 6, References: 137, Pages: 33
          Categories
          Conference Report

          Endocrinology & Diabetes,Neurology,Nutrition & Dietetics,Sexual medicine,Internal medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
          Positron emission tomography,Neuroendocrine tumor,Magnetic resonance imaging,Scintigraphy,Somatostatin receptor imaging,Computed tomography,Ultrasound,Single photon emission computed tomography

          Comments

          Comment on this article