Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: A review

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Background:

Nursing care is rapidly evolving due to the advanced technological and medical development, and also due to an increased focus on standardization and the logic of production, permeating today’s hospital cultures. Nursing is rooted in a holistic approach with an ethical obligation to maintain and respect the individual’s dignity and integrity. However, working within time limits and heavy workload leads to burnout and ethical insensitivity among nurses, and may challenge nurses’ options to act on the basis of ethical and moral grounds in the individual care situation.

Aim:

The aim of this study is to describe and discuss ethical dilemmas described and experienced by nurses in clinical practice today.

Method:

The study was performed as a literature review following the matrix method allowing to synthesize literature across methodological approaches. A literature search was performed, including relevant studies published between 2011 and 2016. A total of 15 articles were included and analyzed focusing on their description of ethical dilemmas.

Ethical consideration:

We have considered and respected ethical conduct when performing a literature review, respecting authorship and referencing sources.

Results:

The analysis revealed three themes, relating to important aspects of nursing practice, such as the nurse–patient relationship, organizational structures, and collaboration with colleagues. The findings are summarized in the following three themes: (1) balancing harm and care, (2) work overload affecting quality, and (3) navigating in disagreement. Ethically difficult situations are evident across settings and in very diverse environments from neonatal care to caring for the older people. Organizational structures and being caught in-between professional values, standardization, and busyness was evident, revealing the complexity of nursing practice and the diversity of ethical dilemmas, concerns, and distress experienced by clinical nurses.

Conclusion:

Nursing practice is challenged by organizational structures and the development of the health care system, inhibiting nurses’ professional decision-making and forcing them to compromise basic nursing values.

Related collections

Most cited references 37

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques

Carolyn Emden, Margarete Sandelowski, Sharron L. Docherty (1997)

0 comments Cited 160 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Book: not found

Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care

Tronto Joan., JC Tronto, J Tronto … (1993)

0 comments Cited 149 times – based on 0 reviews

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Lifeworld-led healthcare is more than patient-led care: an existential view of well-being.

Karin Dahlberg, Les Todres, Kathleen Galvin (2009)

In this paper we offer an appreciation and critique of patient-led care as expressed in current policy and practice. We argue that current patient-led approaches hinder a focus on a deeper understanding of what patient-led care could be. Our critique focuses on how the consumerist/citizenship emphasis in current patient-led care obscures attention from a more fundamental challenge to conceptualise an alternative philosophically informed framework from where care can be led. We thus present an alternative interpretation of patient-led care that we call 'lifeworld-led care', and argue that such lifeworld-led care is more than the general understanding of patient-led care. Although the philosophical roots of our alternative conceptualisation are not new, we believe that it is timely to re-consider some of the implications of these perspectives within current discourses of patient-centred policies and practice. The conceptualisation of lifeworld-led care that we develop includes an articulation of three dimensions: a philosophy of the person, a view of well-being and not just illness, and a philosophy of care that is consistent with this. We conclude that the existential view of well-being that we offer is pivotal to lifeworld-led care in that it provides a direction for care and practice that is intrinsically and positively health focused in its broadest and most substantial sense.