289
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      BECN1 and BIM interactions with MCL-1 determine fludarabine resistance in leukemic B cells

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purine analog fludarabine (Fd) is an essential therapeutic for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Innate or acquired resistance to Fd is a significant clinical problem and is largely mediated by increased expression of BCL-2 family members. The antiapoptotic BCL-2 family proteins inhibit both apoptosis and autophagy, therefore, downregulation of antiapoptotic BCL-2 family proteins and enhanced autophagy must coexist in cells dying in response to an apoptosis inducing therapeutic. However, in the drug-resistant cells that have an increased dependence on antiapoptotic proteins, whether autophagy is also inhibited remains unclear. Here, we examined the role of the BCL-2 family in regulating cell death and autophagy in leukemic cell lines and their derivative isogenic Fd-resistant (FdR) cells. MCL-1 degradation following Fd treatment freed the proapoptotic effectors BIM and BECN1, thus leading to cell death-associated autophagy in Fd-sensitive cells. However, in FdR cells, low BIM expression and BECN1 sequestration by MCL-1 prevented cell death. Consistently, in sensitive cells inhibition of apoptosis using siBIM and of both the early-phase autophagy nucleation steps by siBECN1, shATG7 or 3-methyladenine and the late-phase autophagy by shLAMP2, significantly reduced Fd-induced cell death. Paradoxically, FdR cells were addicted to basal autophagy, which was dependent on AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) but not BECN1. Moreover, in FdR cells, inhibition of autophagy by shLAMP2, but not siBECN1, enhanced cell death. The BH3-mimetic obatoclax released BIM and BECN1 from MCL-1 in Fd-sensitive and BECN1 from MCL-1 in FdR cells, and was effective at killing both Fd-sensitive and - resistant leukemic cells, including primary CLL cells. Therefore, a differential regulation of autophagy through BECN1 and AMPK signaling in Fd-sensitive and - resistant cells determines the different possible outcomes of autophagy inhibition. These findings suggest effective means to overcome Fd resistance by induction of BIM-dependent apoptosis and activation of BECN1-dependent autophagy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy.

          In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Autophagy in cell death: an innocent convict?

            The visualization of autophagosomes in dying cells has led to the belief that autophagy is a nonapoptotic form of programmed cell death. This concept has now been evaluated using cells and organisms deficient in autophagy genes. Most evidence indicates that, at least in cells with intact apoptotic machinery, autophagy is primarily a pro-survival rather than a pro-death mechanism. This review summarizes the evidence linking autophagy to cell survival and cell death, the complex interplay between autophagy and apoptosis pathways, and the role of autophagy-dependent survival and death pathways in clinical diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Regulation of autophagy by cytoplasmic p53.

              Multiple cellular stressors, including activation of the tumour suppressor p53, can stimulate autophagy. Here we show that deletion, depletion or inhibition of p53 can induce autophagy in human, mouse and nematode cells subjected to knockout, knockdown or pharmacological inhibition of p53. Enhanced autophagy improved the survival of p53-deficient cancer cells under conditions of hypoxia and nutrient depletion, allowing them to maintain high ATP levels. Inhibition of p53 led to autophagy in enucleated cells, and cytoplasmic, not nuclear, p53 was able to repress the enhanced autophagy of p53(-/-) cells. Many different inducers of autophagy (for example, starvation, rapamycin and toxins affecting the endoplasmic reticulum) stimulated proteasome-mediated degradation of p53 through a pathway relying on the E3 ubiquitin ligase HDM2. Inhibition of p53 degradation prevented the activation of autophagy in several cell lines, in response to several distinct stimuli. These results provide evidence of a key signalling pathway that links autophagy to the cancer-associated dysregulation of p53.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cell Death Dis
                Cell Death Dis
                Cell Death & Disease
                Nature Publishing Group
                2041-4889
                May 2013
                16 May 2013
                1 May 2013
                : 4
                : 5
                : e628
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH, USA
                [2 ]Cleveland State University , Cleveland, OH, USA
                [3 ]Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, OH, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic , NB40, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. Tel: +216 445 9970; Fax: +216 445 6269; E-mail: almasaa@ 123456ccf.org
                Article
                cddis2013155
                10.1038/cddis.2013.155
                3674362
                23681223
                50e2b735-f6cd-49c4-902c-bf77b631871d
                Copyright © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

                History
                : 17 December 2012
                : 03 April 2013
                : 10 April 2013
                Categories
                Original Article

                Cell biology
                autophagy,mcl-1,becn1,bim,fludarabine resistance
                Cell biology
                autophagy, mcl-1, becn1, bim, fludarabine resistance

                Comments

                Comment on this article