5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Observing third-party ostracism enhances facial mimicry in 30-month-olds

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mimicry is suggested to be one of the strategies via which we enhance social affiliation. Although recent studies have shown that, like adults, young children selectively mimic the facial actions of in-group over out-group members, it is unknown whether this early mimicry behavior is driven by affiliative motivations. Here we investigated the functional role of facial mimicry in early childhood by testing whether observing third-party ostracism, which has previously been shown to enhance children’s affiliative behaviors, enhances facial mimicry in 30-month-olds. Toddlers were presented with videos in which one shape was ostracized by other shapes or with control videos that did not show any ostracism. Before and after this, the toddlers observed videos of models performing facial actions (e.g., eyebrow raising, mouth opening) while we measured activation over their corresponding facial muscles using electromyography (EMG) to obtain an index of facial mimicry. We also coded the videos of the sessions for overt imitation. We found that toddlers in the ostracism condition showed greater facial mimicry at posttest than toddlers in the control condition, as indicated by both EMG and behavioral coding measures. Although the exact mechanism underlying this result needs to be investigated in future studies, this finding is consistent with social affiliation accounts of mimicry and suggests that mimicry may play a key role in maintaining affiliative bonds when toddlers perceive the risk of social exclusion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Social categorization and intergroup behaviour

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates.

            Infants between 12 and 21 days of age can imitate both facial and manual gestures; this behavior cannot be explained in terms of either conditioning or innate releasing mechanisms. Such imitation implies that human neonates can equate their own unseen behaviors with gestures they see others perform.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected].

              For inferring a treatment effect from the difference between a treated and untreated group on a quantitative outcome measured before and after treatment, current methods are analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of the outcome with the baseline as covariate, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) of change from baseline. This article compares both methods on power and bias, for randomized and nonrandomized studies. The methods are compared by writing both as a regression model and as a repeated measures model, and are applied to a nonrandomized study of preventing depression. In randomized studies both methods are unbiased, but ANCOVA has more power. If treatment assignment is based on the baseline, only ANCOVA is unbiased. In nonrandomized studies with preexisting groups differing at baseline, the two methods cannot both be unbiased, and may contradict each other. In the study of depression, ANCOVA suggests absence, but ANOVA of change suggests presence, of a treatment effect. The methods differ because ANCOVA assumes absence of a baseline difference. In randomized studies and studies with treatment assignment depending on the baseline, ANCOVA must be used. In nonrandomized studies of preexisting groups, ANOVA of change seems less biased than ANCOVA, but two control groups and two baseline measurements are recommended.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Exp Child Psychol
                J Exp Child Psychol
                Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
                Academic Press
                0022-0965
                1096-0457
                1 August 2020
                August 2020
                : 196
                : 104862
                Affiliations
                [a ]Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK
                [b ]Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, UK
                [c ]Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
                [d ]Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                [e ]Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, 1353 København, Denmark
                [f ]Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, UK. c.deklerk@ 123456essex.ac.uk
                Article
                S0022-0965(19)30185-7 104862
                10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104862
                7262587
                32353814
                50fde810-6a64-4afa-93fc-49c401071e87
                © 2020 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 April 2019
                : 27 March 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                mimicry,affiliation,priming,ostracism,toddlerhood,imitation
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                mimicry, affiliation, priming, ostracism, toddlerhood, imitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article