7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Fifteen-year Interval Spirometric Evaluation of the Oregon Predictive Equations

      , , , ,
      Chest
      American College of Chest Physicians

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The 1969 Oregon spirometric predictive equations were evaluated by retesting 199 of the 988 original sample population after 15 years. The 1969 data were used to test for sample bias between the retested and not-retested groups. There was no significant difference in mean values for age, height, or test results except for a five-year age difference in men. Regression analysis of residuals and the differences between calculated and predicted values of annual decrements of FVC, FEV1, and FEF25-75% on age revealed no statistically significant age trend. Although residual means were statistically significant for FVC and FEV1 for men and FVC and FEF25-75% for women, the differences between calculated and predicted annual decrements were significant only for women in FEF25-75%. Although group performance was accurately predicted for most tests, test SDs and SEMs demonstrated considerable individual variation. Lower limits of normality are suggested to assist in evaluating previously-tested patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Chest
          Chest
          American College of Chest Physicians
          00123692
          January 1988
          January 1988
          : 93
          : 1
          : 123-127
          Article
          10.1378/chest.93.1.123
          3335142
          510fd50c-f7a4-414a-b9c4-d8f66ffa4083
          © 1988

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article