14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          White Americans who participate in the Black Lives Matter movement, men who attended the Women’s March, and people from the Global North who work to reduce poverty in the Global South—advantaged group members (sometimes referred to as allies) often engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Tensions can arise, however, over the inclusion of advantaged group members in these movements, which we argue can partly be explained by their motivations to participate. We propose that advantaged group members can be motivated to participate in these movements (a) to improve the status of the disadvantaged group, (b) on the condition that the status of their own group is maintained, (c) to meet their own personal needs, and (d) because this behavior aligns with their moral beliefs. We identify potential antecedents and behavioral outcomes associated with these motivations before describing the theoretical contribution our article makes to the psychological literature.

          Related collections

          Most cited references163

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.

            An implicit association test (IAT) measures differential association of 2 target concepts with an attribute. The 2 concepts appear in a 2-choice task (2-choice task (e.g., flower vs. insect names), and the attribute in a 2nd task (e.g., pleasant vs. unpleasant words for an evaluation attribute). When instructions oblige highly associated categories (e.g., flower + pleasant) to share a response key, performance is faster than when less associated categories (e.g., insect & pleasant) share a key. This performance difference implicitly measures differential association of the 2 concepts with the attribute. In 3 experiments, the IAT was sensitive to (a) near-universal evaluative differences (e.g., flower vs. insect), (b) expected individual differences in evaluative associations (Japanese + pleasant vs. Korean + pleasant for Japanese vs. Korean subjects), and (c) consciously disavowed evaluative differences (Black + pleasant vs. White + pleasant for self-described unprejudiced White subjects).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pers Soc Psychol Rev
                Pers Soc Psychol Rev
                PSR
                sppsr
                Personality and Social Psychology Review
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                1088-8683
                1532-7957
                11 May 2020
                November 2020
                : 24
                : 4
                : 291-315
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The University of Edinburgh, UK
                [2 ]Osnabrück University, Germany
                [3 ]Durham University, UK
                [4 ]University of Hagen, Germany
                [5 ]Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
                Author notes
                [*]Helena R. M. Radke, The University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK. Email: helena.radke@ 123456ed.ac.uk
                Article
                10.1177_1088868320918698
                10.1177/1088868320918698
                7645619
                32390573
                5122c92a-0b81-4c42-9305-4c1a5c9c9532
                © 2020 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: DFG BE 4648/4-1
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                social change,allies,motivations,collective action,protest
                social change, allies, motivations, collective action, protest

                Comments

                Comment on this article