1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Relación entre la utilización de recursos sanitarios y aspectos socioeconómicos en Atención Primaria Translated title: Relationship between the use of health resources and psychosocioeconomic aspects in Primary Care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Introducción: estudiar la influencia de los factores socioeconómicos y psicológicos familiares en la demanda y utilización de recursos sanitarios en las consultas pediátricas de Atención Primaria (AP). Material y métodos: estudio descriptivo observacional realizado mediante cuestionarios recogidos, durante un periodo de 1 año a familias de niños entre 1 mes y 14 años de edad pertenecientes a 2 consultas urbanas de AP de Madrid. Se analizaron datos crudos, comparaciones entre grupos y análisis multivariante. Resultados: se analizaron 434 cuestionarios. El número de consultas totales fue mayor en los pacientes de menor edad (p = 0,001) y en aquellos cuyos padres presentaban elevado nivel de ansiedad (p = 0,001). Las familias con todos sus miembros en paro presentaron niveles de ansiedad (odds ratio [OR]: 5,85; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95]: 2,56 a 13,34; p <0,0001) y depresión (OR: 6,25; IC 95: 2,64 a 14,76; p <0,0001) significativamente superiores al resto. La realización de pruebas de laboratorio fue superior en los niños con enfermedad crónica (OR: 3,84; IC 95: 2,09 a 7,07; p <0,0001) y en aquellos con un nivel de ansiedad elevado en los padres (OR: 2,78; IC 95: 1,46 a 5,28); p = 0,02). La toma de fármacos fue superior en los niños con enfermedad crónica (OR: 3,15; IC 95: 1,60 a 6,19; p = 0,001) y menor en los niños de más edad (OR: 0,93; IC 95: 0,87 a 0,98; p = 0,014). Conclusiones: la frecuentación y el consumo de fármacos en general y antibióticos en particular, así como la solicitud de pruebas diagnósticas de laboratorio e imagen están directamente relacionados con el nivel elevado de ansiedad o depresión en los padres y con la presencia de enfermedad crónica en los niños e inversamente con la edad de los mismos. Sería recomendable la detección e intervención en los casos de elevada ansiedad parental para intentar reducir el consumo de recursos sanitarios.

          Translated abstract

          Introduction: the aim of our study was to analyse the influence of family socioeconomic and psychological factors on the demand and use of health resources in paediatric consultations in Primary Care. Methods: descriptive observational study carried out using questionnaires collected over a period of 1 year. Questionnaires were collected from children between 1 month and 14 years old, belonging to 2 urban Primary Care clinics in Madrid. The raw data was analysed, and comparisons between groups and multivariate analysis were performed. Results: we compared 434 questionnaires. The number of total consultations was higher in younger patients (p = 0.001) and in those whose parents presented high levels of anxiety (p = 0.001). Families with all their members in unemployed presented anxiety (OR: 5.85; IC 95: 2.567-13.341; p <0.0001) and depression (OR: 6.250; IC 95: 2.647-14.760; p <0.0001) levels higher than the rest. Laboratory and imaging test were higher in children with chronic disease (OR: 3.84; IC 95: 2.09-7.07; p <0.0001) and high level of anxiety in parents (OR: 2.78; IC 95: 1.46-5.28; p = 0.02). Drugs use was higher in children with chronic disease (OR: 3.15; IC 95: 1.60-6.19; p = 0.001) and lower in older children (OR: 0.927; IC 95: 0.87-0.98; p = 0.014). Conclusions: hyper-attendance and drug consumption in general and antibiotics in particular, as well as the request for imaging and laboratory test, is directly related to the high level of anxiety in the parents and the presence of chronic disease in children and inversely with the age. It would be advisable to detect and, if possible, intervene in cases of high parental anxiety in order to try to reduce the consumption of health resources.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7 million men and women

          Summary Background In 2011, WHO member states signed up to the 25 × 25 initiative, a plan to cut mortality due to non-communicable diseases by 25% by 2025. However, socioeconomic factors influencing non-communicable diseases have not been included in the plan. In this study, we aimed to compare the contribution of socioeconomic status to mortality and years-of-life-lost with that of the 25 × 25 conventional risk factors. Methods We did a multicohort study and meta-analysis with individual-level data from 48 independent prospective cohort studies with information about socioeconomic status, indexed by occupational position, 25 × 25 risk factors (high alcohol intake, physical inactivity, current smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and obesity), and mortality, for a total population of 1 751 479 (54% women) from seven high-income WHO member countries. We estimated the association of socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors with all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality by calculating minimally adjusted and mutually adjusted hazard ratios [HR] and 95% CIs. We also estimated the population attributable fraction and the years of life lost due to suboptimal risk factors. Findings During 26·6 million person-years at risk (mean follow-up 13·3 years [SD 6·4 years]), 310 277 participants died. HR for the 25 × 25 risk factors and mortality varied between 1·04 (95% CI 0·98–1·11) for obesity in men and 2 ·17 (2·06–2·29) for current smoking in men. Participants with low socioeconomic status had greater mortality compared with those with high socioeconomic status (HR 1·42, 95% CI 1·38–1·45 for men; 1·34, 1·28–1·39 for women); this association remained significant in mutually adjusted models that included the 25 × 25 factors (HR 1·26, 1·21–1·32, men and women combined). The population attributable fraction was highest for smoking, followed by physical inactivity then socioeconomic status. Low socioeconomic status was associated with a 2·1-year reduction in life expectancy between ages 40 and 85 years, the corresponding years-of-life-lost were 0·5 years for high alcohol intake, 0·7 years for obesity, 3·9 years for diabetes, 1·6 years for hypertension, 2·4 years for physical inactivity, and 4·8 years for current smoking. Interpretation Socioeconomic circumstances, in addition to the 25 × 25 factors, should be targeted by local and global health strategies and health risk surveillance to reduce mortality. Funding European Commission, Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Swiss National Science Foundation, the Medical Research Council, NordForsk, Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Erosion of universal health coverage in Spain.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Medida de la importancia de las dimensiones de la satisfacción en la provisión de servicios de salud

              Objetivo: La necesidad de conocer la percepción de la calidad asistencial recibida por los ciudadanos es clave para abordar con éxito mejoras en la prestación de los servicios de salud. El principal objetivo de este trabajo es presentar la aplicación de una metodología que permita identificar aspectos que facilitan la identificación de áreas de mejora. Método: Aplicación de un cuestionario a tres líneas de servicio en Cataluña (atención primaria [n=332], atención especializada ambulatoria [n=410] y urgencias hospitalarias [n=413]) para medir la satisfacción de los usuarios y evaluar la importancia otorgada a los aspectos analizados. Resultados: El análisis de valoración-importancia permite señalar que los principales aspectos a mejorar en atención primaria son los que se refieren al tiempo que el profesional dedica a sus pacientes, así como su predisposición para escuchar sus opiniones. En urgencias hospitalarias, el principal aspecto de mejora se refiere a las condiciones físicas del establecimiento. Conclusiones: Las herramientas diseñadas e implementadas por el Servicio Catalán de la Salud han demostrado ser instrumentos válidos para detectar los temas de actuación prioritarios para la mejora de la prestación de servicios y para fomentar la equidad territorial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                pap
                Pediatría Atención Primaria
                Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria
                Asociación Española de Pediatría de Atención Primaria (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                1139-7632
                September 2021
                : 23
                : 91
                : 239-246
                Affiliations
                [2] Madrid orgnameFundación para la Investigación, Estudio y Desarrollo de la Salud Pública España
                [1] Madrid orgnameCentro de Salud Párroco Julio Morate España
                Article
                S1139-76322021000300002 S1139-7632(21)02309100002
                51af292d-1c73-40bd-899f-7ae2f3c468b6

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 36, Pages: 8
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Originales

                Socioeconomic level,Health resources,Nivel socioeconómico,Recursos sanitarios

                Comments

                Comment on this article