39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The reality of transdisciplinarity: a framework-based self-reflection from science and practice leaders

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper provided results of a framework-based self-reflection process conducted by the science and the practice leaders of two transdisciplinary projects realized in co-leadership from 2011 until 2014. It analyzes from the perspectives of the science and practice leaders for the whole research process including preparation, research, and follow-up phase, the (1) transdisciplinarity component of each module (in %); (2) outputs generated (tangible and intangible); (3) relevance of output for science and practice (qualitative ranking); (4) impacts emerging from the outputs (tangible and intangible); and (5) outcomes emerging from the impacts (tangible and intangible). Furthermore, the research process was reflected by practice and science project leaders and critical aspects identified. We found that first, a transdisciplinary research process might contribute to regional demands if it is carried out “timely.” Timeliness includes (1) the need from the perspective of the practice partners and the scientific community, (2) the willingness of the co-leaders to develop the project together, and (3) the fundamental organizational support. This was the case in our project where the results directly impacted the further development of the project. Second, a truly lived co-leadership consisting of clearly defined and lived roles and responsibilities, common definition and alignment of the goals, and acceptance of the differences in needs by practice and science leads to a trustful cooperation. Third, a good communication structure within the teams and between the practice and science teams allows to anticipating and overcoming problems at the practice-science interface leading to mutual learning and experience building.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.

          A major problem worldwide is the potential loss of fisheries, forests, and water resources. Understanding of the processes that lead to improvements in or deterioration of natural resources is limited, because scientific disciplines use different concepts and languages to describe and explain complex social-ecological systems (SESs). Without a common framework to organize findings, isolated knowledge does not cumulate. Until recently, accepted theory has assumed that resource users will never self-organize to maintain their resources and that governments must impose solutions. Research in multiple disciplines, however, has found that some government policies accelerate resource destruction, whereas some resource users have invested their time and energy to achieve sustainability. A general framework is used to identify 10 subsystem variables that affect the likelihood of self-organization in efforts to achieve a sustainable SES.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Environment and development. Sustainability science.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Researchers' roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                claudia.binder@lmu.de
                iris.absenger-helmli@energieregion.at
                t.schilling@lmu.de
                Journal
                Sustain Sci
                Sustain Sci
                Sustainability Science
                Springer Japan (Tokyo )
                1862-4065
                1862-4057
                13 August 2015
                13 August 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 4
                : 545-562
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Chair for Human-Environment-Relations, Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Luisenstraße 37, 80333 Munich, Germany
                [2 ]EU Leader Energieregion Weiz-Gleisdorf GmbH, Franz-Pichler-Straße 32, 8160 Weiz, Austria
                Article
                328
                10.1007/s11625-015-0328-2
                6106648
                30174728
                51d6140c-b5ab-4b82-80cc-bac6331a09b7
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 12 January 2015
                : 14 July 2015
                Funding
                Funded by: Austrian Climate Fond
                Award ID: B068700
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Special Feature: Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Japan 2015

                transdisciplinarity,reality check,self-reflection,framework,energy regions

                Comments

                Comment on this article