7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of surrounding wall thickness on the fatigue resistance of molars restored with ceramic inlay

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of buccal and lingual wall thickness on the fatigue resistance of molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. Forty human third molars were selected and divided into 4 groups, according to the remaining surrounding wall thickness chosen for inlay preparation (n = 10): G1, 2.0 mm; G2, 1.5 mm; G3, 1.0 mm; G4, 0.5 mm. All inlays were made from feldspathic ceramic blocks by a CAD/CAM system, and cemented adhesively. After 1 week stored in distilled water at 37 °C, the specimens were subjected to fatigue testing under the following protocol: 5Hz; pre-load of 200 N for 5,000 cycles, followed by increasing loads of 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200 and 1400 N for 30,000 cycles each. The specimens were cycled until failure or completion of 185,000 cycles. The survival rate of the groups was compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves (p > 0.05). All specimens withstood the fatigue protocol (185,000 cycles), representing a 100% survival rate. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed no difference between groups. It can be concluded that the remaining tooth wall thickness did not influence the fatigue resistance of molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations.

          J R Kelly (1999)
          One common test of single-unit restorations involves applying loads to clinically realistic specimens through spherical indenters, or equivalently, loading curved incisal edges against flat compression platens. As knowledge has become available regarding clinical failure mechanisms and the behavior of in vitro tests, it is possible to constructively question the clinical validity of such failure testing and to move toward developing more relevant test methods. This article reviewed characteristics of the traditional load-to-failure test, contrasted these with characteristics of clinical failure for all-ceramic restorations, and sought to explain the discrepancies. Literature regarding intraoral conditions was reviewed to develop an understanding of how laboratory testing could be revised. Variables considered to be important in simulating clinical conditions were described, along with their recent laboratory evaluation. Traditional fracture tests of single unit all-ceramic prostheses are inappropriate, because they do not create failure mechanisms seen in retrieved clinical specimens. Validated tests are needed to elucidate the role(s) that cement systems, bonding, occlusion, and even metal copings play in the success of fixed prostheses and to make meaningful comparisons possible among novel ceramic and metal substructures. Research over the past 6 years has shown that crack systems mimicking clinical failure can be produced in all-ceramic restorations under appropriate conditions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Materials for chairside CAD/CAM-produced restorations.

            and Overview. Although the use of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) seems to be a recent addition to the dental restorative armamentarium, this concept was first investigated more than 35 years ago. CEREC (Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, Bensheim, Germany) was the first and is the only available chairside system, and it has more than 20 years of use in the dental office. The initial concept had three tenets: esthetic ceramic reconstruction, a single patient visit and minimal tooth reduction (inlays and onlays instead of crowns). The author reviews the materials used for CAD/CAM-fabricated restorations. The structure, properties and clinical success of the materials for full-contour chairside restorations, as well as laboratory-based high-strength all-ceramic restorations are presented. CAD/CAM restorations have demonstrated clinical success owing to a combination of improvements in materials with advances in CAD/CAM systems. Full-contour ceramic restorations fabricated chair-side may reinforce the tooth, providing good long-term clinical success. High-strength milled restorations allow for the use of all-ceramic restorations for multiple-unit posterior and anterior bridges. Examination of the structure, properties and clinical results of CAD/CAM materials supports their use in routine dental practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The evolution of the CEREC system.

              Early in 1980, the author anticipated the attraction of restoring posterior teeth with tooth-colored material. He conducted studies and developed the clinical concept of bonded ceramic inlays, at the same time raising the issue of the fast fabrication of the ceramic restorations. The author developed plans for in-office computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) fabrication of ceramic restorations specifically to enable the dentist to complete one or multiple ceramic restorations chairside, in a single appointment. The initial concept comprised a small mobile CAD/CAM unit integrating a computer, keyboard, trackball, foot pedal and optoelectronic mouth camera as input devices, a monitor and a machining compartment. CEREC 3 (Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, Bensheim, Germany) divided the system into an acquisition/design unit and a separate machining unit. Three-dimensional software makes the handling illustrative and easy both in the office and in the laboratory.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                bor
                Brazilian Oral Research
                Braz. oral res.
                Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO (São Paulo )
                1807-3107
                June 2014
                : 28
                : 1
                : 01-08
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brazil
                [2 ] Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brazil
                Article
                S1806-83242014000100229
                10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0011
                24918366
                51db1d29-0fe2-40d2-8b9f-1035ab923bc1

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1806-8324&lng=en
                Categories
                DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

                Dentistry
                Stress,Mechanical,Ceramics,Inlays
                Dentistry
                Stress, Mechanical, Ceramics, Inlays

                Comments

                Comment on this article