16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Invited commentary: is it time to retire the "pack-years" variable? Maybe not!

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cumulative exposure--the product of intensity and duration for a constant exposure rate or its integral over time if variable--has been widely used in epidemiologic analyses of extended exposures, for example, the "pack-years" variable for tobacco smoking. Although the effects of intensity and duration are known to differ for exposures like smoking and ionizing radiation and simple cumulative exposure does not explicitly allow for modification by other time-related variables, such as age at exposure or time since exposure, the cumulative exposure variable has the merit of simplicity and has been shown to be one of the best predictors for many exposure-response relationships. This commentary discusses recent refinements of the pack-years variable, as discussed in this issue of the Journal by Vlaanderen et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(3):290-298), in the broader context of general exposure-time-response relationships.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am. J. Epidemiol.
          American journal of epidemiology
          1476-6256
          0002-9262
          Feb 1 2014
          : 179
          : 3
          Article
          kwt274
          10.1093/aje/kwt274
          24355333
          520362a3-4087-48da-ba45-4d5fd66a1e0f
          History

          cancer,cumulative exposure,exposure-time-response relationships,models of carcinogenesis,radiation,smoking,time-related modifiers,tobacco

          Comments

          Comment on this article