62
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions

      review-article
      1 , 2 , , 3 , 4
      Living Reviews in Relativity
      Springer International Publishing
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A wealth of astronomical data indicate the presence of mass discrepancies in the Universe. The motions observed in a variety of classes of extragalactic systems exceed what can be explained by the mass visible in stars and gas. Either (i) there is a vast amount of unseen mass in some novel form — dark matter — or (ii) the data indicate a breakdown of our understanding of dynamics on the relevant scales, or (iii) both. Here, we first review a few outstanding challenges for the dark matter interpretation of mass discrepancies in galaxies, purely based on observations and independently of any alternative theoretical framework. We then show that many of these puzzling observations are predicted by one single relation — Milgrom’s law — involving an acceleration constant a 0 (or a characteristic surface density Σ = a 0/ G) on the order of the square-root of the cosmological constant in natural units. This relation can at present most easily be interpreted as the effect of a single universal force law resulting from a modification of Newtonian dynamics (MOND) on galactic scales. We exhaustively review the current observational successes and problems of this alternative paradigm at all astrophysical scales, and summarize the various theoretical attempts (TeVeS, GEA, BIMOND, and others) made to effectively embed this modification of Newtonian dynamics within a relativistic theory of gravity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references441

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant

          We present observations of 10 type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) between 0.16 0) and a current acceleration of the expansion (i.e., q_0 0, the spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are consistent with q_0 0 at the 3.0 sigma and 4.0 sigma confidence levels, for two fitting methods respectively. Fixing a ``minimal'' mass density, Omega_M=0.2, results in the weakest detection, Omega_Lambda>0 at the 3.0 sigma confidence level. For a flat-Universe prior (Omega_M+Omega_Lambda=1), the spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia require Omega_Lambda >0 at 7 sigma and 9 sigma level for the two fitting methods. A Universe closed by ordinary matter (i.e., Omega_M=1) is ruled out at the 7 sigma to 8 sigma level. We estimate the size of systematic errors, including evolution, extinction, sample selection bias, local flows, gravitational lensing, and sample contamination. Presently, none of these effects reconciles the data with Omega_Lambda=0 and q_0 > 0.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

            We report measurements of the mass density, Omega_M, and cosmological-constant energy density, Omega_Lambda, of the universe based on the analysis of 42 Type Ia supernovae discovered by the Supernova Cosmology Project. The magnitude-redshift data for these SNe, at redshifts between 0.18 and 0.83, are fit jointly with a set of SNe from the Calan/Tololo Supernova Survey, at redshifts below 0.1, to yield values for the cosmological parameters. All SN peak magnitudes are standardized using a SN Ia lightcurve width-luminosity relation. The measurement yields a joint probability distribution of the cosmological parameters that is approximated by the relation 0.8 Omega_M - 0.6 Omega_Lambda ~= -0.2 +/- 0.1 in the region of interest (Omega_M 0) = 99%, including the identified systematic uncertainties. The best-fit age of the universe relative to the Hubble time is t_0 = 14.9{+1.4,-1.1} (0.63/h) Gyr for a flat cosmology. The size of our sample allows us to perform a variety of statistical tests to check for possible systematic errors and biases. We find no significant differences in either the host reddening distribution or Malmquist bias between the low-redshift Calan/Tololo sample and our high-redshift sample. The conclusions are robust whether or not a width-luminosity relation is used to standardize the SN peak magnitudes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The 2MASS Large Galaxy Atlas

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                benoit.famaey@astro.unistra.fr , http://astro.u-strasbg.fr/~famaey/
                stacy.mcgaugh@case.edu , http://astroweb.case.edu/ssm/
                Journal
                Living Rev Relativ
                Living Rev Relativ
                Living Reviews in Relativity
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1433-8351
                7 September 2012
                7 September 2012
                2012
                : 15
                : 1
                : 10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, CNRS, UMR 7550, Paris, France
                [2 ]AIfA, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, USA
                [4 ]Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
                Article
                10
                10.12942/lrr-2012-10
                5255531
                526ee38c-aa69-4380-b633-43fe630ae3b0
                © The Author(s) 2012
                History
                : 30 April 2012
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2012

                Comments

                Comment on this article