12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      IL-6 variant is associated with metastasis in breast cancer patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Although tumor metastases remain significant drivers of mortality, the genetic factors that increase the risks of metastases are not fully identified. Interleukin 6 ( IL-6) has emerged as an important factor in breast cancer progression with IL-6 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants shown to affect survival. We hypothesized that SNPs of the IL-6 promoter at rs1800795 in breast cancer patients are associated with distant metastases.

          Methods

          We performed an initial case-control study using Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s BioVU, a genomic biobank linked to de-identified electronic medical records in the Synthetic Derivative database, to identify germline SNPs that may predict the development of metastatic disease to any site from any solid tumor including breast cancer. We identified a SNP in IL-6: rs1800795 to be of significance and evaluated this finding using a separate, matched-pair cohort of breast cancer patients with and without metastases from The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.

          Results

          The initial study suggested that GG relative to CG at rs1800795 (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.14–2.02; p = 0.004) was significantly associated with the development of metastases. This association was also observed in the Ohio State University cohort (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.06–4.71; p = 0.001). There were no significant relationships between rs1800795 status and any patient or tumor characteristics, including estrogen receptor status.

          Conclusions

          These findings suggest that GG SNP at IL-6: rs1800795 may indicate an increased risk of metastasis of primary breast cancer. Further studies in larger population sets are warranted as advanced screening and prophylactic intervention might be employed in GG carriers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Molecular basis of metastasis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Circulating interleukin-6 predicts survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

            Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a multifunctional cytokine produced by macrophages, T cells, B cells, endothelial cells and tumour cells. Interleukin-6 is able to promote tumour growth by upregulating anti-apoptotic and angiogenic proteins in tumour cells. In murine models it has been demonstrated that antibodies against IL-6 diminish tumour growth. Several reports have highlighted the prognostic importance of IL-6 in e.g., prostate and colon cancer. We addressed prospectively the prognostic significance of serum IL-6 (sIL-6), measured at diagnosis of metastasis, in 96 unselected and consecutive patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer before the initiation of systemic therapy. The median sIL-6 value for the breast cancer population was 6.6 +/- 2.1 pg/ml. Patients with 2 or more metastatic sites had higher sIL-6 values compared to those with only 1 metastatic site (respectively 8.15 +/- 1.7 pg/ml and 3.06 +/- 6.6 pg/ml; p < 0.001). Patients with liver metastasis (8.3 +/- 2.4 pg/ml), with pleural effusions (10.65 +/- 9.9 pg/ml) and with dominant visceral disease (8.15 +/- 3.3 pg/ml) had significantly higher values compared to those without liver metastases (4.5 +/- 3.4 pg/ml; p = 0.001), without pleural effusions (5.45 +/- 1.5 pg/ml; p = 0.0077) and with dominant bone disease (4.5 +/- 1.4 pg/ml; p = 0.007) respectively. No correlation between sIL-6 and age, menopausal status, performance status, tumour grade, body-mass index, histology and hormone receptor status was found. Multivariate analysis showed that high levels of serum IL-6 have independent prognostic value. We conclude that circulating IL-6 is associated with worse survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer and is correlated with the extent of disease. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Serum interleukin-6 levels correlate to tumor progression and prognosis in metastatic breast carcinoma.

              Serum concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-2 and IL-6 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay in 46 Japanese patients with metastatic breast cancer. No IL-2 activity was detectable, only two patients had a detectable TNF-alpha level, and 4 had detectable IL-1 beta concentrations. No correlations were found between TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta levels and clinicopathological parameters. Twenty-two patients (48%) showed higher serum IL-6 levels than the cut-off value of 4 pg/ml. Significantly higher IL-6 levels were detected in patients with more than one metastatic site and with dominant metastatic visceral disease than in those with one metastatic site (median, 6.9 vs 1.1 pg/ml, P < 0.0001) or with dominant metastatic bone or soft tissue disease (median, 7.1 vs 2.4, P < 0.05). The patients with liver metastasis and pleural effusion showed significantly higher serum IL-6 levels than those without liver metastases (median, 17.2 vs 2 pg/ml, P = 0.0006) or pleural effusion (median, 12.1 vs 2.1 pg/ml, P = 0.02). A strong correlation was observed between IL-6 levels and C-reactive protein levels (r = 0.47, P = 0.0006). Patients unresponsive to chemo-endocrine therapy showed significantly higher serum IL-6 levels than those who responded to chemo-endocrine therapy (P = 0.0007). Moreover, the patients with high IL-6 levels showed significantly poorer survival than patients with low IL-6 levels. Multivariate analysis revealed that IL-6, as well as disease-free interval, is an independent prognostic factor of metastatic breast cancer. These results suggest that IL-6 levels are elevated and may be an aggressive parameter in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Higher IL-6 serum levels are found to predict a poorer response to chemo-endocrine therapy, and to represent a poorer prognostic predictor in metastatic breast cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                21 July 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 7
                : e0181725
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
                [2 ] Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
                [3 ] Department of Urologic Surgery and Center for Quantitative Science, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
                [4 ] Center for Quantitative Science, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
                [5 ] Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America
                [6 ] Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America
                University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2824-2514
                Article
                PONE-D-17-05837
                10.1371/journal.pone.0181725
                5521838
                28732081
                527fd5e0-534c-45d6-a048-c5d2af9c55d0
                © 2017 Abana et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 13 February 2017
                : 6 July 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 5, Pages: 15
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: CA118158
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: CA 188500
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000869, Susan G. Komen for the Cure;
                Award ID: BCTR0201704
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006538, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine;
                Award ID: 1S10RR025141-01
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: UL1TR000445
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006538, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine;
                Award ID: P30 CA0068485
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: CA163838
                Award Recipient :
                This study was funded by the following grants: NIH grant CA118158, CA 188500, and Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Research Award BCTR0201704 to FX. The datasets used for the analyses described were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s BioVU, which is supported by institutional funding, the 1S10RR025141-01 instrumentation award, and by the Vanderbilt CTSA grant UL1TR000445 from NCATS/NIH. The research in this publication was supported, in part, through funding from the NIH-NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA0068485. This study was also partially funded by the NIH and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH grant T32 GM007347 to COA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Breast Tumors
                Breast Cancer
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Metastasis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Basic Cancer Research
                Metastasis
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                North America
                United States
                Ohio
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Cancer Detection and Diagnosis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Detection and Diagnosis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Genotyping
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Genotyping
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Hormones
                Estrogens
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Human Genetics
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article