4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Online learning as a way to tackle instabilities and biases in neural network parameterizations

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over the last couple of years, machine learning parameterizations have emerged as a potential way to improve the representation of sub-grid processes in atmospheric models. All previous studies created a training dataset from a high-resolution simulation, fitted a machine learning algorithms to that dataset, and then plugged the trained algorithm into an atmospheric model. The resulting online simulations were frequently plagued by instabilities and biases. Here, I propose online learning as a way to combat these issues. In online learning, the pretrained machine learning parameterization, specifically a neural network, is run in parallel with a high-resolution simulation which is kept in sync with the neural network-driven atmospheric model through constant forcing. This enables the neural network to learn from the tendencies that the high-resolution simulation would produce if it experienced the atmospheric states the neural network creates. The concept is illustrated using the Lorenz 96 model, where online learning is able to recover the "true" parameterizations. Then I present detailed algorithms for implementing online learning in the 3D cloud-resolving model and super-parameterization frameworks. Finally, I discuss outstanding challenges and issues not solved by this approach.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models

          Significance Current climate models are too coarse to resolve many of the atmosphere’s most important processes. Traditionally, these subgrid processes are heuristically approximated in so-called parameterizations. However, imperfections in these parameterizations, especially for clouds, have impeded progress toward more accurate climate predictions for decades. Cloud-resolving models alleviate many of the gravest issues of their coarse counterparts but will remain too computationally demanding for climate change predictions for the foreseeable future. Here we use deep learning to leverage the power of short-term cloud-resolving simulations for climate modeling. Our data-driven model is fast and accurate, thereby showing the potential of machine-learning–based approaches to climate model development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning

            The process of parameter estimation targeting a chosen set of observations is an essential aspect of numerical modeling. This process is usually named tuning in the climate modeling community. In climate models, the variety and complexity of physical processes involved, and their interplay through a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, must be summarized in a series of approximate submodels. Most submodels depend on uncertain parameters. Tuning consists of adjusting the values of these parameters to bring the solution as a whole into line with aspects of the observed climate. Tuning is an essential aspect of climate modeling with its own scientific issues, which is probably not advertised enough outside the community of model developers. Optimization of climate models raises important questions about whether tuning methods a priori constrain the model results in unintended ways that would affect our confidence in climate projections. Here, we present the definition and rationale behind model tuning, review specific methodological aspects, and survey the diversity of tuning approaches used in current climate models. We also discuss the challenges and opportunities in applying so-called objective methods in climate model tuning. We discuss how tuning methodologies may affect fundamental results of climate models, such as climate sensitivity. The article concludes with a series of recommendations to make the process of climate model tuning more transparent.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Climate goals and computing the future of clouds

              How clouds respond to warming remains the greatest source of uncertainty in climate projections. Improved computational and observational tools can reduce this uncertainty. Here we discuss the need for research focusing on high-resolution atmosphere models and the representation of clouds and turbulence within them.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                02 July 2019
                Article
                1907.01351
                52d63e2b-8019-4e79-8842-619d623eab7f

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Custom metadata
                https://github.com/raspstephan/Lorenz-Online
                physics.ao-ph physics.comp-ph

                Mathematical & Computational physics,Atmospheric, Oceanic and Environmental physics

                Comments

                Comment on this article