1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recognizing the roles of primary health care in addressing non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: Lesson from COVID-19, implications for the future

      discussion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, are key challenges to achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Looking at trends over the years, the surge in NCDs is anticipated to continue, with the greatest impact on the poor and marginalized groups, mainly from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, people with one or more underlying NCDs were particularly vulnerable given the increased risk of severe disease and death [2]. Despite being vulnerable, people living with NCDs (PLWNCDs) faced challenges meeting their health care needs, attributed to the preventive measures against COVID-19 such as physical distancing and nationwide lockdowns and restrictions, which further exacerbated their physical and mental health outcomes [1]. COVID-19 disrupted the regular health services as the demand for acute care surged and strained the already weak public health system of many countries, especially in those hardest-hit by COVID-19, such as India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Brazil, Iran, and some other LMICs, stretching them beyond their capacity. In fact, the pandemic in some LMICs contributed to a near collapse of health service delivery [1]. Given their increased vulnerability to COVID-19, although PLWNCDs required greater support and care to manage their conditions than ever before, overwhelmed health care systems failed to meet their needs. Recalling the old truism constructed by Winston Churchill, “one should never let a crisis go to waste,” there is an opportunity to learn from COVID-19, specifically with regards to the prevention and control of NCDs. In this paper, we first highlight the challenges faced by PLWNCDs during the COVID-19 pandemic, then discuss how primary health care (PHC) can act as a critical foundation for strategies to meet the health needs of the PLWNCDs during current and future outbreaks and emergencies. Photo: Peripheral health system of Nepal captured by Uday N Yadav in 2019 (used with permission). CHALLENGES FACED BY PEOPLE WITH NCDS IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC As NCDs and COVID-19 are highly correlated, they cannot be addressed in siloes. Further, during outbreaks, health systems have dual responsibilities to respond to acute system demand as well as continuing to provide essential health services. However, a rapid assessment by the World Health Organization (WHO) on the impact of COVID-19 on NCD resources and services revealed a considerable disruption to NCD services in many LMICs due of a lack of budget allocation for NCDs by governments or relocation of funds from NCDs to COVID-19 management [3]. Additionally, LMICs were much less likely than high-income countries to include NCDs in their COVID-19 response plans [4]. Despite the importance of prevention and control of NCDs during the pandemic [5], preventive measures such as lockdowns have made health care almost inaccessible [6]. Public transport, the main means of transport for low-socioeconomic groups, ceased in many LMICs such as Nepal, India, Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic. As private transport is accessible only to the wealthier groups in many of these countries [7,8], these restrictions disrupted visits to health facilities and/or seeking health care for acute care and essential services related to NCDs. Several studies from LMICs also revealed severe disruption of health services for PLWNCDs, and consequently, the need for alternative delivery methods to face-to-face consultations [9-11]. Moreover, fear of contracting COVID-19 while seeking treatment also jeopardized their access to care [12]. Emerging evidence from LMICs also shows that PLWNCDs, particularly from marginalized populations, experience myriad challenges in accessing health services, and procuring medication for pre-existing conditions, missed follow-up visits, and experienced worsening of their pre-existing conditions [4]. The lockdown measures also aggravated risk factors for NCDs such as a sedentary lifestyle, unhealthy diet/less access to nutritional foods as well as increased smoking, alcohol and tobacco use [1,11]. PRIMARY HEALTH CARE AND ITS ROLE IN PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF NCDS IN LMICS Recognizing the global burden and impact of NCDs on individuals and societies, WHO developed the Global Strategy for Prevention and Control of NCDs (2013-2020) and Package of Essential Noncommunicable (PEN) Disease Interventions for integration and management of NCDs into PHC in low-resource settings, which has been endorsed by 193 member states [13]. In any public health emergency, PHC can play a crucial role in addressing the emergency-introduced local public health needs within the limit of available resources. However, a survey conducted by WHO reported that NCDs were not prioritized in the COVID-19 response plans of many LMICs [3]. In the current pandemic, many health leaders and policymakers of LMICs have failed to consider PHC as an essential part of the COVID-19 response, which created constraints on secondary and tertiary health facilities. Despite the need to establish a strong PHC at the community/population level, LMICs, often with the assistance of donor nations/organizations, have focused on establishing teaching hospitals, medical and nursing schools, and disease-specific vertical programs [14,15]. LMICs do have the concept of strong PHC incorporated in their plans and policies. However, in reality, their PHC services are not in a position to deliver comprehensive health care services. Often a major portion of the budget is invested in secondary and tertiary hospitals and there is a lack of linkage between the overall health plan and its actual implementation in LMICs. Tertiary-level health services are expensive and concentrated in urban areas, making access to comprehensive health care challenging for rural populations. WAYS FORWARD During and beyond the pandemic, continuity of comprehensive care for PLWNCDs can be delivered through a strong PHC system by engaging community health workers in promoting self-management of NCDs, expanding digital innovation at the PHC level, and introducing policies, advocacy, and research to broaden the scope and our knowledge of NCDs management through PHC. Figure 1 demonstrates the essential components/elements of PHC required for required for addressing health needs of PLWNCDs during pandemic and beyond. Figure 1 Comprehensive care framework for people with noncommunicable diseases using primary health care (PHC) approach. White circle: Pillars of PHC. Purple circle: Elements of PHC. Green circle: Benefits of comprehensive preventive and promotive health care services for people with non-communicable disease. Revitalization of PHC Strong PHC systems are essential to maintaining essential health care services in communities, but the workforce shortages and absenteeism have hindered the provision of care through PHC. Specifically, in LMICs, the availability of a health workforce at the PHC level is substantially below the level recommended by WHO [16]. Mixed interventions, such as free or subsidized educational and training opportunities for students from rural, indigenous tribes and marginalized communities, providing incentives to health care staff to move to rural areas of shortage, and re-locating staffs in their own local bodies or province have been adopted by various countries to address the issues of health workforce shortage [17,18]. During COVID-19 pandemic, PHC has been mobilized in LMICs for continuity of care for PLWNCDs by re-organizing service delivery for better access (eg, expanding home-based care and provision of virtual counseling), operating NCD clinics [12], involving community health workers in delivery of medicines, extending the operation of pharmacies and PHC to 24 hours to maintain essential services and operating teleconsultation services [19,20]. In Thailand, access to medicines for PLWNCDs was maintained through village health volunteers or postal services (17). Drawing upon these leanings, it is vital to involve PHC in emergency preparedness and developing strategies to provide health services to vulnerable people like PLWNCDS. The pandemic had demonstrated that clear lines of responsibility should be given to PHC for ensuring continuity of care for vulnerable groups such as PLWNCDs. Self-management support and engagement of community health workers As treatment of NCDs can be expensive, it may pose major economic challenges to health care systems in many LMICs. Hence, comprehensive self-management that can reduce health care expenses [21], should be prioritized and expanded in LMICs. Community health workers (CHWs) are a well-established, effective, and relatively inexpensive human health resource in many LMICs for delivering self-management support for chronic disease patients [22]. CHW’s involvement in PHC delivery saves time and financial cost without compromising the quality of care or health outcomes for patients [23]. In this context, CHWs can be trained to empower and engage PLWNCDs to prevent and manage NCDs in LMICs during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Opportunity for digital innovation at the level of PHC Although telemedicine existed pre-pandemic, it received significant attention in the COVID-19 era as an effective alternative for health service delivery when face-to-face consultations are not feasible [24]. Some LMICs such as Egypt, Pakistan, India, Philippines, Sri Lanka, China etc. have leveraged telemedicine to deliver health care services for people with NCDs during COVID-19 pandemic. For example, the “e-sanjeevani” initiative by the Government of India has been used to monitor symptoms and provide advice on self-care for PLWNCDs [19,25]. The COVID-19 pandemic is a wake-up call for policy makers of LMICs to frame regulations and standards to support the adoption of telemedicine to help and alleviate the pressure on health care systems during and beyond the pandemic. Policy, advocacy, and research In general, and specifically during this pandemic, emergency management policies were often centered on hospitals rather than PHC. This highlights the need to incorporate PHC in all policies, strategies, and services developed to manage emergencies. During the current and future pandemics, PHC could be leveraged as a critical foundation and the first line of defense for direct surveillance and management of outbreaks through community testing, contact tracing, outbreak communication, isolation, and other public health and social measures that have been crucial in slowing down disease transmission as well as a service delivery mechanism for the vulnerable population such as PLWNCDS. Policymakers and health care leaders also need to prioritize investment in human health resources in PHC as well as the essential diagnostic and medical supplies required for PHC to deliver comprehensive PHC services. Researchers working in LMICs have the opportunity to undertake studies on: (i) documenting their experience of implementing PEN package at PHC during the pandemic (ii) design and evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of digital health technologies in the management of NCDs within PHC, and (ii) design and test models of care with PHC at the frontline of holistic care for PLWNCDs. CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the lives of all, including PLWNCDs. The public health actions implemented by the governments of LMICs during the COVID-19 pandemic have been largely directed towards strengthening secondary and tertiary care and containment strategies for COVID-19 while continuity of care for PLWNCDs did not receive enough attention. PHC could be strengthened to blunt the impact of the current and future pandemics and emergencies on public health by providing continuity of care and essential health services to vulnerable and disadvantage groups. Some ideas to strengthen PHC includes delivering comprehensive preventive and treatment services linked to other levels of care, innovating PHC delivery through the use of digital technology, mobilization of CHWs to provide to localized health care both during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Does comorbidity increase the risk of patients with COVID-19: evidence from meta-analysis

          Currently, the number of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has increased rapidly, but relationship between comorbidity and patients with COVID-19 still not clear. The aim was to explore whether the presence of common comorbidities increases COVID-19 patients’ risk. A literature search was performed using the electronic platforms (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and other databases) to obtain relevant research studies published up to March 1, 2020. Relevant data of research endpoints in each study were extracted and merged. All data analysis was performed using Stata12.0 software. A total of 1558 patients with COVID-19 in 6 studies were enrolled in our meta-analysis eventually. Hypertension (OR: 2.29, P<0.001), diabetes (OR: 2.47, P<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR: 5.97, P<0.001), cardiovascular disease (OR: 2.93, P<0.001), and cerebrovascular disease (OR:3.89, P=0.002)were independent risk factors associated with COVID-19 patients. The meta-analysis revealed no correlation between increased risk of COVID-19 and liver disease, malignancy, or renal disease. Hypertension, diabetes, COPD, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease are major risk factors for patients with COVID-19. Knowledge of these risk factors can be a resource for clinicians in the early appropriate medical management of patients with COVID-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence

            Background The outbreak of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a public health emergency of international concern. Telehealth is an effective option to fight the outbreak of COVID-19. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the role of telehealth services in preventing, diagnosing, treating, and controlling diseases during COVID-19 outbreak. Methods This systematic review was conducted through searching five databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Science Direct. Inclusion criteria included studies clearly defining any use of telehealth services in all aspects of health care during COVID-19 outbreak, published from December 31, 2019, written in English language and published in peer reviewed journals. Two reviewers independently assessed search results, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Quality assessment was based on the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist. Narrative synthesis was undertaken to summarize and report the findings. Results Eight studies met the inclusion out of the 142 search results. Currently, healthcare providers and patients who are self-isolating, telehealth is certainly appropriate in minimizing the risk of COVID-19 transmission. This solution has the potential to prevent any sort of direct physical contact, provide continuous care to the community, and finally reduce morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 outbreak. Conclusions The use of telehealth improves the provision of health services. Therefore, telehealth should be an important tool in caring services while keeping patients and health providers safe during COVID-19 outbreak.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of COVID-19 on routine care for chronic diseases: A global survey of views from healthcare professionals

              Currently most global healthcare resources are focused on coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This resource reallocation could disrupt the continuum of care for patients with chronic diseases. We aimed to evaluate the global impact of COVID-19 on routine care for chronic diseases. (see Table 1 ) Table 1 Responses from healthcare professionals who completed the online survey between March 31 and April 23, 2020. Table 1 Survey questions No. (%) Healthcare profession (n = 202) Primary care physician 75 (37.1) Hospital physician 40 (19.8) Nurse 46 (22.8) Other 41 (20.3) 

 How are you continuing to provide routine chronic disease management care for your patients? (n = 202) Face-to-face 29 (14.4) Telephone 90 (44.6) Both (face-to-face and telephone) 70 (34.7) Other 13 (6.4) 

 How has the management of chronic disease care for your patients been since the outbreak of COVID-19? (n = 202) Very poor 9 (4.5) Poor 39 (19.3) Fair 96 (47.5) Good 52 (25.7) Excellent 6 (3.0) 

 What effect do you think changes in healthcare services has had on your patients with chronic disease since the outbreak of COVID-19? (n = 200) No effect 5 (2.5) Mild effect 61 (30.5) Moderate effect 92 (46.0) Severe effect 42 (21.0) 

 How frequently have your patients been impacted by medication shortages since the start of COVID-19? (n = 201) Never 32 (15.9) Rarely 37 (18.4) Sometimes 96 (47.8) Often 35 (17.4) Always 1 (0.5) 

 Has the mental health of your patients worsened since the outbreak of COVID-19? (n = 200) Yes (most patients) 41 (20.5) Yes (some patients) 118 (59.0) No, it has stayed the same 36 (18.0) No, it has improved 5 (2.5) We developed an English language nine-item online survey targeted at healthcare professionals (HCPs) across the globe, using a drop-down menu format. Prior to dissemination the survey was tested by a group of HCPs for the time to complete and to ensure no questions were distressing. The survey was administered between March 31 and April 23, 2020. The survey link was posted to social media (including Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram), websites, and mailing lists. The posts were sharable to facilitate snowball sampling. Informed consent was obtained. Descriptive analyses were performed. 202 HCPs from 47 countries responded; 47% from Europe, 20% Asia, 12% South America, 10% Africa, 9% North America, 2% Oceania. 75 (37%) were primary care physicians, 40 (20%) hospital physicians, 46 (23%) nurses, and 41 (20%) other HCPs (Table). Only 14% reported continuing face-to-face care for all consultations, whilst the majority reported a change to either a proportion (35%) or all now being carried out by telephone (45%). HCPs who selected other (6%), highlighted use of telemedicine where online video consultations were being used through Zoom, Skype, WhatsApp, Facebook messenger. Some reported home visits, or cancellation of all outpatient appointments. Diabetes (38%) was the condition reported to be most impacted by the reduction in healthcare resources due to COVID-19, followed by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, 9%), hypertension (8%), heart disease (7%), asthma (7%), cancer (6%) and depression (6%) (Figure). Additionally, the two most common co-occurring chronic diseases for which care was impacted by COVID-19 were diabetes and hypertension (30%), diabetes and COPD (13%), heart failure and COPD (8%) (Figure). Whilst the overall management of chronic disease care for patients was reported to be fair (48%) or good (26%), most HCPs (67%) rated moderate or severe effects on their patients due to changes in healthcare services since the outbreak. Moreover, 80% reported the mental health of their patients worsened during COVID-19 (Table). Findings from this global survey showed HCPs have adapted to new ways of delivering care using telemedicine in order to reduce face-to-face contacts. Adapting new ways of virtual healthcare and digital technologies is imperative to allow HCPs to continue routine appointments. Further, the use of apps can support self-management of chronic conditions, i.e. continuous glucose monitoring enables support with diabetes. However, the majority of people with non-communicable diseases live in low-middle income countries, where these technologies may not be widely available or practical [1]. Moreover, those with multiple chronic conditions may rely heavily on regular check-ups or hospital appointments to manage risk factors, are left trying to adapt to non-face-to-face interactions, or experiencing delay in treatment which may potentially have severe consequences. Limitations of this survey include that it was only disseminated in English, as part of our networks we may have preferentially approached those working in diabetes. Also, difficulty in obtaining responses from HCPs when workloads may have already increased considerably. There will be heterogeneity between countries in that some countries are currently not as affected by the virus compared to others, and regulations of lockdown and social distancing differ by country, thus further research is required. To avoid a rise in non-COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality, including increased depression and anxiety, it is important that patients with chronic diseases continue to receive care in spite of the pandemic [2]. Our study found that this is currently being done through face-to-face consultation in clinics (away from COVID-19 patients) or through virtual communication.Fig. 1 Fig. 1 Chronic disease and comorbidities most impacted by COVID-19 due to the reduction in care, based on responses by healthcare professionals who completed the online survey between March 31 and April 23, 2020 Fig. 1 Funding/support The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC-EM). Ethical approval and informed consent All participants gave informed consent at the start of the survey and no confidential data was collected, as all responses remained completely anonymous. This study has been approved by the University of Leicester College of Life Sciences Committee for Research Ethics Concerning Human Subjects (Non-NHS). Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Glob Health
                J Glob Health
                JGH
                Journal of Global Health
                International Society of Global Health
                2047-2978
                2047-2986
                13 November 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 03120
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, Sydney, Australia
                [2 ]Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
                [3 ]Centre for Research Policy and Implementation (CRPIN), Biratnagar, Nepal
                [4 ]BRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [5 ]ARCED Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [6 ]Department of Sociology and Gerontology and Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA
                [7 ]Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                [8 ]School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, College of Science and Sustainability, Central Queensland University, Sydney Campus, Australia
                [9 ]World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
                [10 ]School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
                Author notes
                Correspondence to:
Uday Narayan Yadav
National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health
Research School of Population Health
The Australian National University
Canberra
Australia
 uday.yadav@ 123456anu.edu.au
                Article
                jogh-11-03120
                10.7189/jogh.11.03120
                8590826
                52dd56eb-0a05-485d-ab92-96750f30f28d
                Copyright © 2021 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 25, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Viewpoints

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article