7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Recruitment curve of the soleus H-reflex in chronic back pain and lumbosacral radiculopathy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Needle EMG may be negative in mild or predominantly sensory lumbosacral radiculopathies. In such cases, an increase in the latency of the soleus H-reflex is a useful diagnostic criterion for establishing sensory fiber compromise at the S1 root level. However, if clinical signs of radicular involvement are lacking, the latency of the H-reflex is normal. We therefore studied the recruitment curve of the soleus H-reflex to investigate whether a change in the electrical threshold for eliciting the H-reflex might be a more sensitive criterion for detecting subclinical S1 root dysfunction.

          Methods

          Clinical and electrophysiological findings from 26 patients with chronic back pain and radiculopathy were compared with data obtained from 40 healthy subjects.

          Results

          An increase in the mean H-reflex threshold was the only abnormal electrophysiological finding in patients with no clinical sign of root injury (58%). A decrease in the mean H-reflex amplitude and a prolongation of H-reflex latency was observed in patients with radicular signs (42%). In both patients groups, F-wave and needle EMG studies were normal. No radiological evidence of S1 root compression was found.

          Conclusions

          The study of the recruitment curve of the soleus H-reflex may be usefully associated to F-wave and needle EMG studies to detect possible S1 root dysfunction in mild lumbosacral radiculopathies. An increase in H-threshold may be the earliest abnormality in the absence of focal neurological signs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Back pain and sciatica.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pathoanatomy and pathophysiology of nerve root compression.

            The anatomy and physiology of the nerve root complex in the lumbar spine are reviewed, with special reference to the effects of mechanical deformation of nerve roots in association with intervertebral disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Biomechanical aspects of nerve root deformation induced by compression are discussed. The functional changes induced by compression can be caused by mechanical nerve fiber deformation but also may be a consequence of changes in nerve root microcirculation, leading to ischemia and formation of intraneural edema. Nerve root compression can, by different neurophysiologic mechanisms, induce motor weakness and altered sensibility or pain. Intraneural edema and demyelination seem to be critical factors for the production of pain in association with nerve root compression.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of inflammation in lumbar pain.

              J Saal (1995)
              The clinical features of many cases of low back pain is inadequately explained by anatomic abnormalities alone. A pathophysiologic mechanism that includes a combination of mechanical and biochemical factors is an alternative explanation that is accompanied by less paradox than a purely structural paradigm. A potential unifying feature includes inflammation of neural elements caused by the chemical components of the intervertebral disc. There is a historical basis to the concept of an immunologic potential of the lumbar disc. No discrete in situ evidence or discrete mechanism has been previously identified. The recent demonstration of immunohistopathologic evidence of an immunocompetent cellular response at the epidural interface of lumbar HNPs supports the concept of the immunogenic capacity of nucleus pulposus. The identification of high levels of an inflammatory enzyme, phospholipase A2, in lumbar herniated and degenerative discs presents the basis for a direct inflammogenic capability of lumbar discs, separate from a immunologic mechanism. Subsequent experimental findings of conduction block and perineural inflammation as a consequence of extrathecal application of autologous nucleus pulposus and axonal injury after animal nerve injection of the human disc phospholipase A2 further validates this concept. There is a strong theoretic basis to support the concept that the clinical features of many lumbar disc patients may be explained by inflammation caused by biochemical factors alone or combined with mechanical deformation of lumbar tissues, rather than mechanical factors alone.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2474
                2001
                8 October 2001
                : 2
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Istituto di Neurochirurgia, Università di Siena, Italy
                Article
                1471-2474-2-4
                10.1186/1471-2474-2-4
                60003
                11722799
                531a64b0-b30f-4330-9f69-3a1ed680d408
                Copyright © 2001 Mazzocchio et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
                History
                : 28 August 2001
                : 8 October 2001
                Categories
                Research Article

                Orthopedics
                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article