24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Trends in North American medical education.

      The Keio journal of medicine
      Competency-Based Education, methods, trends, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Humans, North America

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Medical education in the United States of America (USA), and worldwide, is increasingly concentrating on the process and outcome of the educational experience. The first efforts to substantially improve medical education in the USA resulted in the Flexner Report in the early 1900s. The release of this report led to significant advancements in the quality of curriculum content. However, in the past few decades there has been increasing realization that delivery of content will not, by itself, assure the development of excellent physicians. As a result, there has been an increasing emphasis on the process, and, most recently, the outcome, of medical education. Process movements have examined the context and methods for teaching and learning. The problem-based learning movement is perhaps the most widely-known example of process trends. The latest trends in USA medical education focus on the outcomes of the learning process. At the forefront of this movement is the American Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), which accredits all USA post-graduate training programs. Recently, the ACGME has defined a set of six core clinical competencies that all graduates must demonstrate. A second emerging trend is inter-professional education. Increasingly, healthcare is provided by inter-professional healthcare team, and students must be competent to function effectively in this setting. Many academic health centers are developing joint curricula to address this need. Medical education has evolved from a primary focus on content to an emphasis on process of teaching and learning, and will increasingly concentrate on educational outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: a long and winding road.

          This article examines literature on interdisciplinary education and teamwork in health care, to discover the major issues and best practices. A literature review of mainly North American articles using search terms such as interdisciplinary, interprofessional, multidisciplinary with medical education. Two issues are emerging in health care as clinicians face the complexities of current patient care: the need for specialized health professionals, and the need for these professionals to collaborate. Interdisciplinary health care teams with members from many professions answer the call by working together, collaborating and communicating closely to optimize patient care. Education on how to function within a team is essential if the endeavour is to succeed. Two main categories of issues emerged: those related to the medical education system and those related to the content of the education. Much of the literature pertained to programme evaluations of academic activities, and did not compare interdisciplinary education with traditional methods. Many questions about when to educate, who to educate and how to educate remain unanswered and open to future research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            STUDENTJAMA. The Flexner report and the standardization of American medical education.

            H. Beck (2004)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Competency-based instruction in critical invasive skills improves both resident performance and patient safety.

              Correct performance of invasive skills is essential, but residents often undertake such procedures after no or minimal instruction. We instructed eight postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residents in the cadaver laboratory using a competency-based approach (CBI). Each resident had been evaluated before the laboratory during patient encounters. Group instruction in endotracheal tube insertion (ET), venous cutdown (VC), and chest tube insertion (CT) was followed by individual pretesting and hands-on teaching, with 100% competency the goal. Failure was considered an inability to perform the task correctly or within 120 seconds. After the laboratory, residents were evaluated for correctness and rapidity of performance. Prelaboratory failures consisted of ET, 7; CT, 5; VC, 7. Postlaboratory failures were 0 for all. Prelaboratory complications consisted of ET, 3.3 +/- 1.1; CT, 1.9 +/- 1.0; VC, 3 +/- 1.0. Postlaboratory complications were 0 for all. Prelaboratory times (seconds) were ET, 66.5 +/- 30.8; CT, 104 +/- 4.1; VC, 116.3 +/- 0.7. Postlaboratory times were ET, 25 +/- 7; CT, 65.5 +/- 10.7; VC, 81.3 +/- 2.5. Changes were statistically significant for all (P < .03, nonparametric). Residents performed 20 CTs with 1 pneumothorax, 80 ETs with 2 failures, and 20 VCs with no complications. Initial trauma resuscitation time decreased from 25 to 10 minutes. (1) Residents' skills rapidly improve with CBI; (2) skills learned through CBI in the laboratory can be translated to and sustained in the clinical setting; (3) CBI produces competent residents who perform skills rapidly and with minimal complications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Comments

                Comment on this article