4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A repeated molecular architecture across thalamic pathways

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Thalamus is the central communication hub of the forebrain, providing cerebral cortex with inputs from sensory organs, subcortical systems, and cortex itself. Multiple thalamic regions send convergent information to each cortical region, but the organizational logic of thalamic projections has remained elusive. Through comprehensive transcriptional analyses of retrogradely labeled thalamic neurons in adult mice, we identify three major profiles of thalamic pathway. These profiles exist along a continuum that is repeated across all major projection systems, such as those for vision, motor control, and cognition. The largest component of gene expression variation in mouse thalamus is topographically organized with features conserved in humans. Transcriptional differences between these thalamic neuronal identities are tied to cellular features critical for function, such as axonal morphology and membrane properties. Molecular profiling therefore reveals covariation in properties of thalamic pathways serving all major input modalities and output targets, establishing a molecular framework for understanding thalamus.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interneuron cell types are fit to function.

          Understanding brain circuits begins with an appreciation of their component parts - the cells. Although GABAergic interneurons are a minority population within the brain, they are crucial for the control of inhibition. Determining the diversity of these interneurons has been a central goal of neurobiologists, but this amazing cell type has so far defied a generalized classification system. Interneuron complexity within the telencephalon could be simplified by viewing them as elaborations of a much more finite group of developmentally specified cardinal classes that become further specialized as they mature. Our perspective emphasizes that the ultimate goal is to dispense with classification criteria and directly define interneuron types by function.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The role of the thalamus in the flow of information to the cortex.

            The lateral geniculate nucleus is the best understood thalamic relay and serves as a model for all thalamic relays. Only 5-10% of the input to geniculate relay cells derives from the retina, which is the driving input. The rest is modulatory and derives from local inhibitory inputs, descending inputs from layer 6 of the visual cortex, and ascending inputs from the brainstem. These modulatory inputs control many features of retinogeniculate transmission. One such feature is the response mode, burst or tonic, of relay cells, which relates to the attentional demands at the moment. This response mode depends on membrane potential, which is controlled effectively by the modulator inputs. The lateral geniculate nucleus is a first-order relay, because it relays subcortical (i.e. retinal) information to the cortex for the first time. By contrast, the other main thalamic relay of visual information, the pulvinar region, is largely a higher-order relay, since much of it relays information from layer 5 of one cortical area to another. All thalamic relays receive a layer-6 modulatory input from cortex, but higher-order relays in addition receive a layer-5 driver input. Corticocortical processing may involve these corticothalamocortical 're-entry' routes to a far greater extent than previously appreciated. If so, the thalamus sits at an indispensable position for the modulation of messages involved in corticocortical processing.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reduced cortical activity due to a shift in the balance between excitation and inhibition in a mouse model of Rett syndrome.

              Rett Syndrome (RTT) is a devastating neurological disorder that is caused by mutations in the MECP2 gene. Mecp2-mutant mice have been used as a model system to study the disease mechanism. Our previous work has suggested that MeCP2 malfunction in neurons is the primary cause of RTT in the mouse. However, the neurophysiological consequences of MeCP2 malfunction remain obscure. Using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in cortical slices, we show that spontaneous activity of pyramidal neurons is reduced in Mecp2-mutant mice. This decrease is not caused by a change in the intrinsic properties of the recorded neurons. Instead, the balance between cortical excitation and inhibition is shifted to favor inhibition over excitation. Moreover, analysis of the miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs)/inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) in the Mecp2-mutant cortex reveals a reduction in mEPSC amplitudes, without significant change in the average mIPSC amplitude or frequency. These findings provide the first detailed electrophysiological analysis of Mecp2-mutant mice and provide a framework for understanding the pathophysiology of the disease and tools for studying the underlying disease mechanisms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9809671
                21092
                Nat Neurosci
                Nat. Neurosci.
                Nature neuroscience
                1097-6256
                1546-1726
                30 July 2019
                16 September 2019
                November 2019
                16 March 2020
                : 22
                : 11
                : 1925-1935
                Affiliations
                [1 ]HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA
                [2 ]Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
                [3 ]Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, UK
                [4 ]Present Address: Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
                [5 ]Present Address: Duke University - Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, NC
                [6 ]These authors contributed equally (co-first authorship): James W. Phillips, Anton Schulmann
                Author notes

                Author Contributions

                JWP: contributed to all aspects of this project. AS: Analyzed and collected data, planned project, and wrote the paper. EH: Planned project and collected data. JW: Collected and analyzed the single cell reconstruction data. CL: Collected and analyzed electrophysiology data. VV: Collected and analyzed electrophysiology data. LW: Collected data. BCS: Collected data. WK: Supervised project. JC: Supervised single cell reconstruction project. ALL: Collected data and developed methods. BM: Edited the paper. JTD: Supervised project and edited the paper SBN: Supervised project and edited the paper. AWH: Initiated, supervised project, and wrote the paper.

                [* ]Correspondence to: James Phillips ( jameswphillips91@ 123456gmail.com ), Sacha Nelson ( nelson@ 123456brandeis.edu ), Adam Hantman ( hantmana@ 123456janelia.hhmi.org )
                Article
                NIHMS1535879
                10.1038/s41593-019-0483-3
                6819258
                31527803
                53ca3325-7148-4336-8729-802124469bad

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article