6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Animals as Social Objects : Groups, Stereotypes, and Intergroup Threats

      research-article
      1 , , 2
      European Psychologist
      Hogrefe Publishing
      social cognition, animals, stereotypes, warmth, competence, prejudice, social groups

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Nonhuman animals are typically excluded from the scope of social psychology. This article presents animals as social objects – targets of human social responses – overviewing the similarities and differences with human targets. The focus here is on perceiving animal species as social groups. Reflecting the two fundamental dimensions of humans’ social cognition – perceived warmth (benign or ill intent) and competence (high or low ability), proposed within the Stereotype Content Model ( Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002 ) – animal stereotypes are identified, together with associated prejudices and behavioral tendencies. In line with human intergroup threats, both realistic and symbolic threats associated with animals are reviewed. As a whole, animals appear to be social perception targets within the human sphere of influence and a valid topic for research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references114

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.

          Stereotype research emphasizes systematic processes over seemingly arbitrary contents, but content also may prove systematic. On the basis of stereotypes' intergroup functions, the stereotype content model hypothesizes that (a) 2 primary dimensions are competence and warmth, (b) frequent mixed clusters combine high warmth with low competence (paternalistic) or high competence with low warmth (envious), and (c) distinct emotions (pity, envy, admiration, contempt) differentiate the 4 competence-warmth combinations. Stereotypically, (d) status predicts high competence, and competition predicts low warmth. Nine varied samples rated gender, ethnicity, race, class, age, and disability out-groups. Contrary to antipathy models, 2 dimensions mattered, and many stereotypes were mixed, either pitying (low competence, high warmth subordinates) or envying (high competence, low warmth competitors). Stereotypically, status predicted competence, and competition predicted low warmth.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dehumanization and infrahumanization.

            We review early and recent psychological theories of dehumanization and survey the burgeoning empirical literature, focusing on six fundamental questions. First, we examine how people are dehumanized, exploring the range of ways in which perceptions of lesser humanness have been conceptualized and demonstrated. Second, we review who is dehumanized, examining the social targets that have been shown to be denied humanness and commonalities among them. Third, we investigate who dehumanizes, notably the personality, ideological, and other individual differences that increase the propensity to see others as less than human. Fourth, we explore when people dehumanize, focusing on transient situational and motivational factors that promote dehumanizing perceptions. Fifth, we examine the consequences of dehumanization, emphasizing its implications for prosocial and antisocial behavior and for moral judgment. Finally, we ask what can be done to reduce dehumanization. We conclude with a discussion of limitations of current scholarship and directions for future research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Categories and induction in young children.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                epp
                European Psychologist
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1016-9040
                1878-531X
                September 08, 2016
                2016
                : 21
                : 3
                : 206-217
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
                [ 2 ]Department of Psychology and Woodrow Wilson School of Public Affairs, Princeton University, NJ, USA
                Author notes
                Verónica Sevillano, Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, 28049, Spain, Tel. +34 9149 789 48, Fax +34 9149 752 15, E-mail vsevilla@ 123456psi.ucm.es
                Article
                epp_21_3_206
                10.1027/1016-9040/a000268
                54195667-3812-4af4-b930-d95773dbd7ab
                Copyright @ 2016
                History
                : December 3, 2014
                : March 29, 2016
                : April 10, 2016
                Categories
                Original Articles and Reviews

                Psychology,General behavioral science
                competence,social cognition,animals,stereotypes,warmth,prejudice,social groups

                Comments

                Comment on this article