10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Understanding the multiple ways people value forests is important, as individual values regarding nature have been shown to partly determine willingness to participate in conservation initiatives. As individual values are influenced by past experiences, the way people value forests may be related to the ecosystem services they use and receive. We here aim to investigate if people value forests because of material and non-material benefits forest provide (material and non-material values), and if these values are defined by previous experiences associated with using forest resources and having frequent contact with forests. By interviewing 363 residents across 20 landscapes varying in forest cover in a post-frontier region in Amazonia, we evaluated: (1) if the use of forest resources—especially bushmeat, important for sustenance and cash income in virtually all tropical forests—is associated with attributing higher material value to forests; (2) whether the contact with forest (estimated by local forest cover and visits to forests) is associated with attributing higher non-material value to forests. As expected, respondents from households where hunting occurs and bushmeat consumption is more frequent attributed higher material value to forests, and those living in more deforested landscapes and that visited forests less often attributed lower non-material value to forests. The importance of bushmeat in shaping the way people value forests suggests that encouraging the sustainable use of this product will encourage forest conservation. Results also point to a potential dangerous reinforcing cycle: low forest cover and the loss of contact with forests may erode forest values and facilitate further deforestation. Engaging rural communities in forest conservation initiatives is challenging yet urgent in degraded landscapes, although harnessing appreciation for bushmeat could offer a starting point.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Land use. Cracking Brazil's Forest Code.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: opportunities for conservation.

            Amazon beef and soybean industries, the primary drivers of Amazon deforestation, are increasingly responsive to economic signals emanating from around the world, such as those associated with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, "mad cow disease") outbreaks and China's economic growth. The expanding role of these economic "teleconnections" (coupled phenomena that take place in distant places on the planet) led to a 3-year period (2002-2004) of historically high deforestation rates. But it also increases the potential for large-scale conservation in the region as markets and finance institutions demand better environmental and social performance of beef and soy producers. Cattle ranchers and soy farmers who have generally opposed ambitious government regulations that require forest reserves on private property are realizing that good land stewardship-including compliance with legislation-may increase their access to expanding domestic and international markets and to credit and lower the risk of "losing" their land to agrarian reform. The realization of this potential depends on the successful negotiation of social and environmental performance criteria and an associated system of certification that are acceptable to both the industries and civil society. The foot-and-mouth eradication system, in which geographic zones win permission to export beef, may provide an important model for the design of a low-cost, peer-enforced, socioenvironmental certification system that becomes the mechanism by which beef and soy industries gain access to markets outside the Amazon.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of social values in the management of ecological systems

              The concept of value is central to the practice and science of ecological management and conservation. There is a well-developed body of theory and evidence that explores concepts of value in different ways across different disciplines including philosophy, economics, sociology and psychology. Insight from these disciplines provides a robust and sophisticated platform for considering the role of social values in ecological conservation, management and research. This paper reviews theories of value from these disciplines and discusses practical tools and instruments that can be utilised by researchers and practitioners. A distinction is highlighted between underlying values that shape people's perception of the world (e.g. altruistic or biospheric value orientations), and the values that people assign to things in the world (e.g. natural heritage, money). Evidence from numerous studies has shown that there are multiple pathways between these values and attitudes, beliefs and behaviours relevant to ecological management and conservation. In an age of increasing anthropogenic impacts on natural systems, recognising how and why people value different aspects of ecological systems can allow ecological managers to act to minimise conflict between stakeholders and promote the social acceptability of management activities. A series of practical guidelines are provided to enable social values to be better considered in ecosystem management and research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                12 December 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 12
                : e0167691
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
                [2 ]Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, Universidade de São Paulo, Ermelino Matarazzo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
                [3 ]Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos (NAEA), Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil
                [5 ]Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
                Chinese Academy of Forestry, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: PCT CM LP RP.

                • Data curation: PCT.

                • Formal analysis: PCT RP.

                • Funding acquisition: PCT LP RP.

                • Investigation: PCT.

                • Methodology: PCT CM LP RP.

                • Project administration: PCT RP.

                • Resources: PCT LP RP.

                • Supervision: RP CM LP.

                • Visualization: PCT RP.

                • Writing – original draft: PCT.

                • Writing – review & editing: PCT CM LP RP.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0426-8277
                Article
                PONE-D-16-10491
                10.1371/journal.pone.0167691
                5152861
                27942038
                54200eef-2bf2-4c12-907d-a826d6c2acc7
                © 2016 Carignano Torres et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 12 March 2016
                : 29 October 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001807, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo;
                Award ID: 2011/19108-0
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001807, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo;
                Award ID: 2001/19606-0
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002322, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003593, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico;
                Award ID: 306715/2011-2
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: INCT Biodiversidade e Uso da Terra na Amazônia
                Award ID: 574008/2008-0
                Funded by: Embrapa
                Award ID: 02.08.06.005.00
                Funded by: UK Government Darwin Initiative
                Award ID: 17-023
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270, Natural Environment Research Council;
                Award ID: NE/F01614X/1
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270, Natural Environment Research Council;
                Award ID: NE/G000816/1
                Funded by: The Nature Conservancy
                This work was supported by INCT – Biodiversidade e Uso da Terra na Amazônia (CNPq 574008/2008-0), Embrapa (SEG: 02.08.06.005.00), the UK government Darwin Initiative (17-023), the Nature Conservancy, the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) (NE/F01614X/1 and NE/G000816/1) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)(2011/19108-0). PCT had doctoral scholarships from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2011/19606-0). RP had a research fellowship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (308205/2014-6) during the development of this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Terrestrial Environments
                Forests
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Forest Ecology
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Forest Ecology
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Multivariate Analysis
                Principal Component Analysis
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics (Mathematics)
                Statistical Methods
                Multivariate Analysis
                Principal Component Analysis
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Culture
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Custom metadata
                Data are available from figshare repository at the following DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4248833.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article