147
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    12
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The double-orifice technique in mitral valve repair: A simple solution for complex problems

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study is to report our results with the central double-orifice technique used for the treatment of complex mitral valve lesions. The central double-orifice repair has been used in 260 patients (mean age, 56 +/- 14.3 years) over a period of 7 years. The mechanism responsible for mitral regurgitation was prolapse of both leaflets in 148 patients, prolapse of the anterior leaflet in 68, prolapse of the posterior leaflet with annular calcification or other unfavorable features in 31, and lack of leaflet coaptation for restricted motion or erosion of the free edge in 13. Degenerative disease was the cause of mitral regurgitation in 80.8% of the patients, rheumatic disease was the cause in 9.6%, endocarditis was the cause in 6.1%, and ischemic disease was the cause in 2.3%. Hospital mortality was 0.7%, and the overall survival at 5 years was 94.4% +/- 2.59%. Thirteen patients required a reoperation (2 early postoperatively and 11 late during the follow-up), for an overall freedom from reoperation of 90.0% +/- 3.37% at 5 years. Freedom from reoperation was lower in patients with rheumatic valve disease and in patients who did not undergo an annuloplasty procedure. The effectiveness and durability of the central double-orifice technique were assessed in this study. This type of repair can be a useful addition to the surgical armamentarium in mitral valve reconstruction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cardiac valve surgery—the “French correction”

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical outcome of mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet.

            Mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet is difficult to manage, because it is frequently asymptomatic yet carries a high risk of left ventricular dysfunction and because the natural history of the condition is poorly defined. We obtained clinical follow-up data through 1994-1995 in 229 patients with isolated mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet; this condition was first diagnosed by echocardiography between 1980 and 1989. The 86 patients who were treated medically had a mortality rate significantly higher than expected (6.3 percent yearly, P=0.016 for the comparison with the expected rate in the U.S. population according to the 1990 census). Independent determinants of mortality were an older age, the presence of symptoms, and a lower ejection fraction. Patients who were even transiently in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV had a high mortality rate (34 percent yearly), but the rate was also notable (4.1 percent yearly) among those in class I or II. At 10 years, the mean (+/- SE) rates of heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and death or surgery were 63 +/- 8, 30 +/- 12, and 90 +/- 3 percent, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, surgical correction of mitral regurgitation (performed in 143 patients) was associated with a reduced mortality rate (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.56; P<0.001). When treated medically, mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet is associated with excess mortality and high morbidity. Surgery is almost unavoidable within 10 years after the diagnosis and appears to be associated with an improved prognosis; this finding suggests that surgery should be considered early in the course of the disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease.

              Degenerative mitral valve disease is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in the United States. Mitral valve repair is applicable in the majority of these patients and has become the procedure of choice. This study was undertaken to identify factors influencing the durability of mitral valve repair. Between 1985 and 1997, 1072 patients underwent primary isolated mitral valve repair for valvular regurgitation caused by degenerative disease. Repair durability was assessed by multivariable risk factor analysis of reoperation. It was supplemented by a search for valve-related risk factors for death before reoperation. Three hospital deaths occurred (0.3%); complete follow-up (4152 patient-years) was available in 1062 of 1069 hospital survivors (99.3%). At 10 years, freedom from reoperation was 93%. Among 30 patients who required reoperation for late mitral valve dysfunction, the repair failed in 16 (53%) as a result of progressive degenerative disease. Durability of repair was adversely affected by pathologic conditions other than posterior leaflet prolapse, use of chordal shortening, annuloplasty alone, and posterior leaflet resection without annuloplasty. Durability was greatest after quadrangular resection and annuloplasty for posterior leaflet prolapse and was enhanced by the use of intraoperative echocardiography. Death before reoperation was increased in patients having isolated anterior leaflet prolapse or valvular calcification and by use of chordal shortening or annuloplasty alone. Repair durability is greatest in patients with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse who have posterior leaflet resection and annuloplasty. Chordal shortening, annuloplasty alone, and leaflet resection without annuloplasty jeopardize late results.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
                The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
                Elsevier BV
                00225223
                October 2001
                October 2001
                : 122
                : 4
                : 674-681
                Article
                10.1067/mtc.2001.117277
                11581597
                5425554f-e0f2-40da-9d06-1cc45b12d2f4
                © 2001

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article