16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy

      research-article
      , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , PA-C, , MD, , MD, , MD, , DO, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, MPH, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , PhD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , BS, , PhD, , MS, , BS, , PhD, , MD
      Neurology
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of brain-responsive neurostimulation in adults with medically intractable focal onset seizures (FOS) over 9 years.

          Methods

          Adults treated with brain-responsive neurostimulation in 2-year feasibility or randomized controlled trials were enrolled in a long-term prospective open label trial (LTT) to assess safety, efficacy, and quality of life (QOL) over an additional 7 years. Safety was assessed as adverse events (AEs), efficacy as median percent change in seizure frequency and responder rate, and QOL with the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-89) inventory.

          Results

          Of 256 patients treated in the initial trials, 230 participated in the LTT. At 9 years, the median percent reduction in seizure frequency was 75% ( p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank), responder rate was 73%, and 35% had a ≥90% reduction in seizure frequency. We found that 18.4% (47 of 256) experienced ≥1 year of seizure freedom, with 62% (29 of 47) seizure-free at the last follow-up and an average seizure-free period of 3.2 years (range 1.04–9.6 years). Overall QOL and epilepsy-targeted and cognitive domains of QOLIE-89 remained significantly improved ( p < 0.05). There were no serious AEs related to stimulation, and the sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) rate was significantly lower than predefined comparators ( p < 0.05, 1-tailed χ 2).

          Conclusions

          Adjunctive brain-responsive neurostimulation provides significant and sustained reductions in the frequency of FOS with improved QOL. Stimulation was well tolerated; implantation-related AEs were typical of other neurostimulation devices; and SUDEP rates were low.

          ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

          NCT00572195.

          Classification of evidence

          This study provides Class IV evidence that brain-responsive neurostimulation significantly reduces focal seizures with acceptable safety over 9 years.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy.

          Randomized trials of surgery for epilepsy have not been conducted, because of the difficulties involved in designing and implementing feasible studies. The lack of data supporting the therapeutic usefulness of surgery precludes making strong recommendations for patients with epilepsy. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. Eighty patients with temporal-lobe epilepsy were randomly assigned to surgery (40 patients) or treatment with antiepileptic drugs for one year (40 patients). Optimal medical therapy and primary outcomes were assessed by epileptologists who were unaware of the patients' treatment assignments. The primary outcome was freedom from seizures that impair awareness of self and surroundings. Secondary outcomes were the frequency and severity of seizures, the quality of life, disability, and death. At one year, the cumulative proportion of patients who were free of seizures impairing awareness was 58 percent in the surgical group and 8 percent in the medical group (P<0.001). The patients in the surgical group had fewer seizures impairing awareness and a significantly better quality of life (P<0.001 for both comparisons) than the patients in the medical group. Four patients (10 percent) had adverse effects of surgery. One patient in the medical group died. In temporal-lobe epilepsy, surgery is superior to prolonged medical therapy. Randomized trials of surgery for epilepsy are feasible and appear to yield precise estimates of treatment effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Multi-day rhythms modulate seizure risk in epilepsy

            Epilepsy is defined by the seemingly random occurrence of spontaneous seizures. The ability to anticipate seizures would enable preventative treatment strategies. A central but unresolved question concerns the relationship of seizure timing to fluctuating rates of interictal epileptiform discharges (here termed interictal epileptiform activity, IEA), a marker of brain irritability observed between seizures by electroencephalography (EEG). Here, in 37 subjects with an implanted brain stimulation device that detects IEA and seizures over years, we find that IEA oscillates with circadian and subject-specific multidien (multi-day) periods. Multidien periodicities, most commonly 20–30 days in duration, are robust and relatively stable for up to 10 years in men and women. We show that seizures occur preferentially during the rising phase of multidien IEA rhythms. Combining phase information from circadian and multidien IEA rhythms provides a novel biomarker for determining relative seizure risk with a large effect size in most subjects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial.

              Deep brain stimulation is an accepted treatment for advanced Parkinson disease (PD), although there are few randomized trials comparing treatments, and most studies exclude older patients. To compare 6-month outcomes for patients with PD who received deep brain stimulation or best medical therapy. Randomized controlled trial of patients who received either deep brain stimulation or best medical therapy, stratified by study site and patient age ( or = 70 years) at 7 Veterans Affairs and 6 university hospitals between May 2002 and October 2005. A total of 255 patients with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage > or = 2 while not taking medications) were enrolled; 25% were aged 70 years or older. The final 6-month follow-up visit occurred in May 2006. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (n = 60) or globus pallidus (n = 61). Patients receiving best medical therapy (n = 134) were actively managed by movement disorder neurologists. The primary outcome was time spent in the "on" state (good motor control with unimpeded motor function) without troubling dyskinesia, using motor diaries. Other outcomes included motor function, quality of life, neurocognitive function, and adverse events. Patients who received deep brain stimulation gained a mean of 4.6 h/d of on time without troubling dyskinesia compared with 0 h/d for patients who received best medical therapy (between group mean difference, 4.5 h/d [95% CI, 3.7-5.4 h/d]; P or = 5 points). Compared with the best medical therapy group, the deep brain stimulation group experienced significant improvements in the summary measure of quality of life and on 7 of 8 PD quality-of-life scores (P < .001). Neurocognitive testing revealed small decrements in some areas of information processing for patients receiving deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy. At least 1 serious adverse event occurred in 49 deep brain stimulation patients and 15 best medical therapy patients (P < .001), including 39 adverse events related to the surgical procedure and 1 death secondary to cerebral hemorrhage. In this randomized controlled trial of patients with advanced PD, deep brain stimulation was more effective than best medical therapy in improving on time without troubling dyskinesias, motor function, and quality of life at 6 months, but was associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00056563.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neurology
                Neurology
                neurology
                neur
                neurology
                NEUROLOGY
                Neurology
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0028-3878
                1526-632X
                1 September 2020
                1 September 2020
                : 95
                : 9
                : e1244-e1256
                Affiliations
                From the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (D.R.N., A.V.A.), OH; California Pacific Medical Center (K.D.L., P.B.W.), San Francisco; Augusta University (A.M.M., Y.D.P.), GA; Henry Ford Hospital (G.L.B.), Detroit, MI; Ohio Health Neuroscience (B.J.S.), Columbus; Swedish Neuroscience Institute (R.P.G., M.J.D.), Seattle, WA; Mayo Clinic Arizona (K.H.N., R.S.Z.), Scottsdale; Johns Hopkins Medicine (G.K.B., W.S.A.), Baltimore, MD; Keck School of Medicine of USC (C.H., C.Y.L.), Los Angeles, CA; Via Christi Epilepsy Center (R.W.L., T.S.), Wichita, KS; Yale University School of Medicine (R.B.D., L.J.H.), New Haven, CT; Mayo Clinic Florida (R.E.W., W.T.), Jacksonville; Columbia University Medical Center (S.S., G.M.M.), New York, NY; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (M.A.A.), Dallas; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (B.C.J., D.W.R.), Hanover, NH; Indiana University School of Medicine (V.S., T.C.W.), Indianapolis; Massachusetts General Hospital (S.S.C., A.J.C.), Boston; Mayo Clinic Minnesota (G.A.W., B.N.L.), Rochester; Medical University of South Carolina (J.C.E., J.J.H.), Charleston; Oregon Health & Science University (D.C. Spencer, L.E.), Portland; Thomas Jefferson University (C.T.S., M.R.S.), Philadelphia, PA; Nicklaus Children's Hospital (I.M.), Miami, FL; Saint Barnabas Medical Center (E.B.G.), Livingston, NJ; University of Rochester Medical Center (M.J.B., A.J.F.), NY; University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics (P.R.), Madison; Baylor College of Medicine (A.M.G., E.M.M.), Houston, TX; Emory University School of Medicine (R.E.G.), Atlanta, GA; George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences (D.C. Shields), Washington, DC; Weill Cornell Medical College (T.H.S., D.R.L.), New York, NY; University of Virginia School of Medicine (N.B.F., W.J.E.), Charlottesville; Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (P.W.O., N.R.V.-P.), New Orleans; University of Florida (S.E., S.N.R.), Gainesville; Wake Forest University Health Sciences (J.G.B.), Winston-Salem, NC; NeuroPace, Inc (T.A.C., F.T.S., C.G.S., K.L.M., T.L.S., M.J.M.), Mountain View; and Stanford University (M.J.M.), Palo Alto, CA.
                Author notes
                Correspondence Dr. Morrell mmorrell@ 123456neuropace.com

                Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

                Coinvestigators are listed at links.lww.com/WNL/B153.

                The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0214-3286
                Article
                NEUROLOGY2019984443 00016
                10.1212/WNL.0000000000010154
                7538230
                32690786
                546de40e-cfce-4b41-9dff-8c08d3707912
                Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 21 March 2019
                : 06 March 2020
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                ONLINE-ONLY

                Comments

                Comment on this article