6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Global, regional, and national consumption of controlled opioids: a cross-sectional study of 214 countries and non-metropolitan territories

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          The consumption of opioids has increased globally since the 1990s. Previous studies of global opioid consumption have concentrated on morphine alone or a subset of opioids, with a focus on cancer pain and palliative care. In this study, we have determined the global, regional, and national consumption of all controlled opioids, including anaesthetics, analgesics, antidiarrheals, opioid substitution therapies, and cough suppressants.

          Methods:

          We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB). We calculated mean opioid consumption (mg/person) globally, regionally, and nationally for 2015–2017, where consumption refers to the total amount of controlled opioids distributed for medical purposes and excludes recreational use. We ranked countries by total consumption and quantified the types of opioids consumed globally.

          Results:

          Between 2015 and 2017, 90% of the world’s population consumed only 11% of controlled opioids. An average of 32 mg/person was consumed annually, but this was not equally distributed across the world. Consumption was the highest in Germany (480 mg/person), followed by Iceland (428 mg/person), the United States (398 mg/person) and Canada (333 mg/person). Oxycodone (35%) was the most heavily consumed controlled opioid globally, followed by morphine (15.9%), methadone (15.8%) and tilidine (14%).

          Conclusion:

          Large disparities persist in most of the world in accessing essential opioid medicines. Consumption patterns should continue to be monitored, and collaborative strategies should be developed to promote access and the appropriate prescribing of opioids in all countries and non-metropolitan territories.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief—an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global patterns of opioid use and dependence: harms to populations, interventions, and future action

            This paper summarises evidence for medicinal uses of opioids; harms related to the extra-medical use and dependence upon these drugs, and for a wide range of interventions to address the harms related to extra-medical opioid use. Finally, we use mathematical modelling to estimate harms and explore the overall health benefits of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) in a range of settings that vary in levels of opioid use and associated harms (overdose, HIV, HCV, suicide, accidental injuries) and responses. Estimates in 2017 suggest 40.5 million people were dependent upon opioids (40.5 million people, 95%UI 34.3–47.9 million) and 109,500 people died from opioid overdose (10.5,800–113,600). OAT can be highly effective in reducing illicit opioid use and improving multiple health and social outcomes, including reduced overall mortality and key causes of death including overdose, suicide, and other injuries. Modelling suggested scaling-up and retaining people in OAT, including providing OAT in prison, could avert a median of 7.7%, 14.5% and 25.9% deaths over the next 20 years (compared to scenarios without OAT) in Kentucky, Kyiv and Tehran, with more impact achieved in Tehran and Kyiv due to the added benefits on HIV mortality.. Other pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments have varying levels of evidence for effectiveness and patient acceptability. Other effective interventions are those focused on preventing harms associated with problematic opioid use. Despite strong evidence for the effectiveness of a range of interventions to improve the health and well-being of people who are dependent on opioids, coverage is low even in high income countries. Treatment quality may be less than desirable, and considerable human, social, and economic harms arise from the criminalisation of illicit opioid use and dependence. Alternative policy frameworks are recommended that adopt a human rights and public health-based approach, do not make drug use a criminal behaviour and seek to reduce drug related harm at the population level.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of and barriers to access to opioid analgesics: a worldwide, regional, and national study.

              Despite opioid analgesics being essential for pain relief, use has been inadequate in many countries. We aim to provide up-to-date worldwide, regional, and national data for changes in opioid analgesic use, and to analyse the relation of impediments to use of these medicines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Pain
                Br J Pain
                BJP
                spbjp
                British Journal of Pain
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2049-4637
                2049-4645
                4 May 2021
                February 2022
                4 May 2021
                : 16
                : 1
                : 34-40
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [2 ]Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                Author notes
                [*]Georgia C Richards, Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, 60-62 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PN, UK. Email: georgia.richards@ 123456kellogg.ox.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0244-5620
                Article
                10.1177_20494637211013052
                10.1177/20494637211013052
                8801686
                35111312
                548c5708-c2d3-4a6e-8ece-b13cf6dc3f1d
                © The British Pain Society 2021

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts10

                opioids,pain management,anaesthetics,analgesics,antidiarrheals,opioid substitution therapies,cough suppressants,narcotics

                Comments

                Comment on this article