1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand (Mis)Matches for Differential City Management in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          With the global increase in population and urban expansion, the simultaneous rise of social demand and degradation of ecosystems is omnipresent, especially in the urban agglomerations of China. In order to manage environmental problems and match ecosystem supply and social demand, these urban agglomerations promoted regional socio-ecological integration but ignored differential city management during the process of integration. Therefore, it is necessary to design a general framework linking ecosystem supply and social demand to differential city management. In addition, in previous studies, ecosystem services supply–demand amount (mis)match assessment was emphasized, but ecosystem services supply–demand type (mis)match assessment was ignored, which may lead to biased decisions. To deal with these problems, this study presented a general ecosystem services framework with six core steps for differential city management and developed a double-indices (amount and type) method to identify ecosystem services supply–demand (mis)matches in an urban agglomeration. This framework and the double-indices method were applied in the case study of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. Ecosystem supply–demand amount and type (mis)match levels and spatial pattern of twenty-six cities were identified. Twenty-six cities in the YRDUA were classified into five kinds of cities with different levels of ES supply–demand (mis)matches for RS, three kinds of cities for PS, and four kinds of cities for CS. Differential city management strategies were designed. Despite its limitations, this study can be a reference to giving insights into ES supply–demand (mis)match assessment and management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references81

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital.

          In response to ecosystem degradation from rapid economic development, China began investing heavily in protecting and restoring natural capital starting in 2000. We report on China's first national ecosystem assessment (2000-2010), designed to quantify and help manage change in ecosystem services, including food production, carbon sequestration, soil retention, sandstorm prevention, water retention, flood mitigation, and provision of habitat for biodiversity. Overall, ecosystem services improved from 2000 to 2010, apart from habitat provision. China's national conservation policies contributed significantly to the increases in those ecosystem services.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services (CICES V5.1): A Policy Brief

              The Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) is widely used for mapping, ecosystem assessment, and natural capital ecosystem accounting. On the basis of the experience gained in using it since the first version was published in 2013, it has been updated for version 5.1. This policy brief summarises what has been done and how the classification can be used.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                31 July 2021
                August 2021
                : 18
                : 15
                : 8130
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Design & China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Rd., Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China; wbcai@ 123456rcees.ac.cn (W.C.); chenrsh04@ 123456gmail.com (R.C.)
                [2 ]Research Center for Eco-Environment Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shuangqing Rd. 18, Beijing 100085, China; weijiang@ 123456rcees.ac.cn
                [3 ]Institute of Ecology and Sustainable Development, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, No.7, Lane 622, Huaihaizhong Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200020, China; duhongyu@ 123456sass.org.cn
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: ylcai2020@ 123456sjtu.edu.cn
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-2844
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9461-1157
                Article
                ijerph-18-08130
                10.3390/ijerph18158130
                8346073
                34360422
                548dbc86-df9b-40f1-88c0-92931e48368b
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 08 June 2021
                : 28 July 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                ecosystem services,supply–demand (mis)matches,urban governance,urbanization,land use,regional sustainable development

                Comments

                Comment on this article