58
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cost Reductive Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery Endotrainer and Animal Lab Training—Our Methodology

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) is a new avenue in laparoscopic urology. The main advantage is the enhanced cosmetic benefits of single hidden scar. Lately many papers are being published on various procedures done by LESS. Like conventional laparoscopy, this approach is likely to be used more widely and hence exposure to this field is essential. However, formal training in this technique is not widely available. Expensive ports and nonavailability of endotrainer may be the factors deterring the training. We have modified the standard laparoscopic endotrainer with improvised ports, to make it suitable for single port laparoscopic training. For the animal lab training improvised ports and low cost instruments were used. Thus the overall cost of the training in LESS was reduced, and better confidence levels were achieved prior to human applications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report.

          A tumor-bearing right kidney was completely excised from an 85-year-old woman using a laparoscopic approach. A newly devised method for intra-abdominal organ entrapment and a recently developed laparoscopic tissue morcellator made it possible to deliver the 190 gm. kidney through an 11 mm. incision.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy.

            To describe our initial experience with single keyhole nephrectomy in a porcine model and in human subjects. Eight nonsurvival laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed in 4 female farm pigs. In 3 renal units, the laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed via a novel single 25-mm trocar, while the remaining 5 nephrectomies were performed using one 10-mm and two 5-mm adjacent trocars. Articulating laparoscopic graspers, conventional endoshears, clips, and a stapler were used for dissection. Three human subjects underwent a single keyhole umbilical laparoscopic nephrectomy with similar instrumentation. Indications for nephrectomy included chronic infection in a nonfunctioning kidney in 2 patients, and a 4.5-cm enhancing renal mass in the other patient. Single keyhole nephrectomy was successfully completed in all 8 porcine renal units and in all 3 human subjects. The mean operative time for the porcine nephrectomies was 49 minutes (range, 20 to 85), with a mean blood loss of 20 mL (range, 5 to 100). Incision size ranged from 3 to 5 cm. The mean operative time for the human nephrectomy cases was 133 minutes (range, 90 to 160). Estimated blood loss was 30 mL, and the kidneys were extracted through a solitary 2 to 4.5 cm periumbilical incision. There were no perioperative complications, and all 3 patients were discharged on hospital day 2. Keyhole umbilical nephrectomy utilizing articulating laparoscopic instrumentation to facilitate triangulation is feasible. We demonstrate safe and successful completion both in a porcine model and in the 3 human patients. Future studies will need to assess the benefits of single-access surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial hundred patients.

              To report our initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in 100 patients in urology. Between October 2007 and December 2008, we performed LESS urologic procedures in 100 patients for various indications. These included nephrectomy (N = 34; simple 14, radical 3, donor 17), nephroureterectomy (N = 2), partial nephrectomy (N = 6), pyeloplasty (N = 17), transvesical simple prostatectomy (N = 32), and others (N = 9). Data were prospectively collected in a database approved by the Institutional Review Board. All procedures were performed using a novel single-port device (r-Port) and a varying combination of standard and specialized bent/articulating laparoscopic instruments. Robotic assistance was used to perform LESS pyeloplasty (N = 2) and simple prostatectomy (N = 1). In addition to standard perioperative data, we obtained data on postdischarge analgesia requirements, time to complete convalescence, and time to return to work. In the study period, LESS procedures accounted for 15% of all laparoscopic cases by the authors for similar indications. Conversion to standard multiport laparoscopy was necessary in 3 cases, addition of a single 5-mm port was necessary in 3 cases, and conversion to open surgery was necessary in 4 cases. On death occurred following simple prostatectomy in a Jehovah's Witness due to patient refusal to accept transfusion following hemorrhage. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in 5 and 9 cases, respectively. Mean operative time was 145, 230, 236, and 113 minutes and hospital stay was 2, 2.9, 2, and 3 days for simple nephrectomy, donor nephrectomy, pyeloplasty, and simple prostatectomy, respectively. The LESS surgery is technically feasible for a variety of ablative and reconstructive applications in urology. With proper patient selection, conversion and complications rates are low. Improvement in instrumentation and technology is likely to expand the role of LESS in minimally invasive urology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diagn Ther Endosc
                DTE
                Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                1070-3608
                1029-0516
                2010
                18 February 2010
                : 2010
                : 598165
                Affiliations
                1Department of Urology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Peelamedu, Coimbatore 641004, India
                2Urology Clinic, 3 Gowtham Annexe, 1054 Avinashi Road, Coimbatore 641 018, India
                Author notes
                *Manickam Ramalingam: uroram@ 123456yahoo.com

                Academic Editor: Pedro F. Escobar

                Article
                10.1155/2010/598165
                2825544
                20182530
                54b9fc1b-13d0-462e-9d26-ba0fb57bfe3b
                Copyright © 2010 Manickam Ramalingam et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 October 2009
                : 2 December 2009
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Radiology & Imaging
                Radiology & Imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article