18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Roost selection by Mauritian tomb bats ( Taphozus mauritianus) in Lilongwe city, Malawi – importance of woodland for sustainable urban planning

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Increasing urbanisation has led to a greater use of artificial structures by bats as alternative roost sites. Despite the widespread presence of bats, roost availability may restrict their distribution and abundance in urban environments. There is limited quantitative information on the drivers of bat roost selection and roosting preferences, particularly in African bats. We explore the factors influencing roost selection in the Mauritian tomb bat ( Taphozous mauritianus), within an urban landscape in Lilongwe city, Malawi. Eight building and five landscape features of roosts were compared with both adjacent and random control buildings throughout the city. Bat occupied buildings were situated closer to woodland (mean 709m) compared to random buildings (mean 1847m) but did not differ in any other landscape features explored. Roosts were situated on buildings with larger areas and taller walls, suggesting bats select features for predator-avoidance and acoustic perception when leaving the roost. Bats preferred buildings with exposed roof beams which may provide refuge from disturbance. Whilst roosts are situated more often on brick walls, this feature was also associated with landscape features, therefore its importance in roost selection is less clear. These results are indicative that T. mauritianus selects roosts at both the building and landscape level. The selectivity of T. mauritianus in relation to its roost sites implies that preferred roosts are a limited resource, and as such, conservation actions should focus on protecting roost sites and the woodland bats rely on.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection.

          Recent studies clarify where the most vulnerable species live, where and how humanity changes the planet, and how this drives extinctions. We assess key statistics about species, their distribution, and their status. Most are undescribed. Those we know best have large geographical ranges and are often common within them. Most known species have small ranges. The numbers of small-ranged species are increasing quickly, even in well-known taxa. They are geographically concentrated and are disproportionately likely to be threatened or already extinct. Current rates of extinction are about 1000 times the likely background rate of extinction. Future rates depend on many factors and are poised to increase. Although there has been rapid progress in developing protected areas, such efforts are not ecologically representative, nor do they optimally protect biodiversity. Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern.

            The range of resources that a species uses (i.e. its niche breadth) might determine the geographical area it can occupy, but consensus on whether a niche breadth-range size relationship generally exists among species has been slow to emerge. The validity of this hypothesis is a key question in ecology in that it proposes a mechanism for commonness and rarity, and if true, may help predict species' vulnerability to extinction. We identified 64 studies that measured niche breadth and range size, and we used a meta-analytic approach to test for the presence of a niche breadth-range size relationship. We found a significant positive relationship between range size and environmental tolerance breadth (z = 0.49), habitat breadth (z = 0.45), and diet breadth (z = 0.28). The overall positive effect persisted even when incorporating sampling effects. Despite significant variability in the strength of the relationship among studies, the general positive relationship suggests that specialist species might be disproportionately vulnerable to habitat loss and climate change due to synergistic effects of a narrow niche and small range size. An understanding of the ecological and evolutionary mechanisms that drive and cause deviations from this niche breadth-range size pattern is an important future research goal. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A review of the major threats and challenges to global bat conservation

              Bats are an ecologically and taxonomically diverse group accounting for roughly a fifth of mammalian diversity worldwide. Many of the threats bats face (e.g., habitat loss, bushmeat hunting, and climate change) reflect the conservation challenges of our era. However, compared to other mammals and birds, we know significantly less about the population status of most bat species, which makes prioritizing and planning conservation actions challenging. Over a third of bat species assessed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) are considered threatened or data deficient, and well over half of the species have unknown or decreasing population trends. That equals 988 species, or 80% of bats assessed by IUCN, needing conservation or research attention. Delivering conservation to bat species will require sustained efforts to assess population status and trends and address data deficiencies. Successful bat conservation must integrate research and conservation to identify stressors and their solutions and to test the efficacy of actions to stabilize or increase populations. Global and regional networks that connect researchers, conservation practitioners, and local stakeholders to share knowledge, build capacity, and prioritize and coordinate research and conservation efforts, are vital to ensuring sustainable bat populations worldwide.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Supervision
                Role: ResourcesRole: Supervision
                Role: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                5 November 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 11
                : e0240434
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
                [2 ] African Bat Conservation, Lilongwe, Malawi
                [3 ] Department of National Parks and Wildlife Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
                [4 ] Bat Conservation Research Lab, Department of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
                University of Western Ontario, CANADA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                [¤]

                Current address: Department of Evolution Behaviour and Environment, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4037-757X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3415-3967
                Article
                PONE-D-19-29462
                10.1371/journal.pone.0240434
                7644015
                33151973
                5515b11a-55f4-4752-9577-bcd8e81d50df
                © 2020 O’Malley et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 22 October 2019
                : 26 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Pages: 12
                Funding
                The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Human Geography
                Urban Geography
                Urban Areas
                Social Sciences
                Human Geography
                Urban Geography
                Urban Areas
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Geographic Areas
                Urban Areas
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Terrestrial Environments
                Urban Environments
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                Trees
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Human Geography
                Urban Geography
                Urbanization
                Social Sciences
                Human Geography
                Urban Geography
                Urbanization
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Habitats
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Habitats
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Africa
                Malawi
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Foraging
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Foraging
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Foraging
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. S1 and S2 Datasets. Data are not ethically or legally restricted.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article