11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The apelinergic system as an alternative to catecholamines in low-output septic shock

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Catecholamines, in concert with fluid resuscitation, have long been recommended in the management of septic shock. However, not all patients respond positively and controversy surrounding the efficacy-to-safety profile of catecholamines has emerged, trending toward decatecholaminization. Contextually, it is time to re-examine the “maintaining blood pressure” paradigm by identifying safer and life-saving alternatives. We put in perspective the emerging and growing knowledge on a promising alternative avenue: the apelinergic system. This target exhibits invaluable pleiotropic properties, including inodilator activity, cardio-renal protection, and control of fluid homeostasis. Taken together, its effects are expected to be greatly beneficial for patients in septic shock.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States.

          In 1992, the first consensus definition of severe sepsis was published. Subsequent epidemiologic estimates were collected using administrative data, but ongoing discrepancies in the definition of severe sepsis produced large differences in estimates. We seek to describe the variations in incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States using four methods of database abstraction. We hypothesized that different methodologies of capturing cases of severe sepsis would result in disparate estimates of incidence and mortality. Using a nationally representative sample, four previously published methods (Angus et al, Martin et al, Dombrovskiy et al, and Wang et al) were used to gather cases of severe sepsis over a 6-year period (2004-2009). In addition, the use of new International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition (ICD-9), sepsis codes was compared with previous methods. Annual national incidence and in-hospital mortality of severe sepsis. The average annual incidence varied by as much as 3.5-fold depending on method used and ranged from 894,013 (300/100,000 population) to 3,110,630 (1,031/100,000) using the methods of Dombrovskiy et al and Wang et al, respectively. Average annual increase in the incidence of severe sepsis was similar (13.0% to 13.3%) across all methods. In-hospital mortality ranged from 14.7% to 29.9% using abstraction methods of Wang et al and Dombrovskiy et al. Using all methods, there was a decrease in in-hospital mortality across the 6-year period (35.2% to 25.6% [Dombrovskiy et al] and 17.8% to 12.1% [Wang et al]). Use of ICD-9 sepsis codes more than doubled over the 6-year period (158,722 - 489,632 [995.92 severe sepsis], 131,719 - 303,615 [785.52 septic shock]). There is substantial variability in incidence and mortality of severe sepsis depending on the method of database abstraction used. A uniform, consistent method is needed for use in national registries to facilitate accurate assessment of clinical interventions and outcome comparisons between hospitals and regions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Septic shock.

            Septic shock, the most severe complication of sepsis, is a deadly disease. In recent years, exciting advances have been made in the understanding of its pathophysiology and treatment. Pathogens, via their microbial-associated molecular patterns, trigger sequential intracellular events in immune cells, epithelium, endothelium, and the neuroendocrine system. Proinflammatory mediators that contribute to eradication of invading microorganisms are produced, and anti-inflammatory mediators control this response. The inflammatory response leads to damage to host tissue, and the anti-inflammatory response causes leucocyte reprogramming and changes in immune status. The time-window for interventions is short, and treatment must promptly control the source of infection and restore haemodynamic homoeostasis. Further research is needed to establish which fluids and vasopressors are best. Some patients with septic shock might benefit from drugs such as corticosteroids or activated protein C. Other therapeutic strategies are under investigation, including those that target late proinflammatory mediators, endothelium, or the neuroendocrine system.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ELABELA: a hormone essential for heart development signals via the apelin receptor.

              We report here the discovery and characterization of a gene, ELABELA (ELA), encoding a conserved hormone of 32 amino acids. Present in human embryonic stem cells, ELA is expressed at the onset of zebrafish zygotic transcription and is ubiquitous in the naive ectodermal cells of the embryo. Using zinc-finger-nuclease-mediated gene inactivation in zebrafish, we created an allelic series of ela mutants. ela null embryos have impaired endoderm differentiation potential marked by reduced gata5 and sox17 expression. Loss of Ela causes embryos to develop with a rudimentary heart or no heart at all, surprisingly phenocopying the loss of the apelin receptor (aplnr), which we show serves as Ela's cognate G protein-coupled receptor. Our results reveal the existence of a peptide hormone, ELA, which, together with APLNR, forms an essential signaling axis for early cardiovascular development. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                david.coquerel@USherbrooke.ca
                xavier.sainsily@USherbrooke.ca
                lauralyne.dumont@USherbrooke.ca
                philippe.sarret@USherbrooke.ca
                eric.marsault@USherbrooke.ca
                mannix.auger-messier@USherbrooke.ca
                Olivier.Lesur@USherbrooke.ca
                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                19 January 2018
                19 January 2018
                2018
                : 22
                : 10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9064 6198, GRID grid.86715.3d, Division of Intensive Care Units, Department of Medicine, , Université de Sherbrooke, ; 3001 - 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5 N4 Canada
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9064 6198, GRID grid.86715.3d, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, , Université de Sherbrooke, ; Sherbrooke, Québec Canada
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9064 6198, GRID grid.86715.3d, Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, , Université de Sherbrooke, ; Sherbrooke, Québec Canada
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9064 6198, GRID grid.86715.3d, Pharmacology Institute of Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medecine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, ; Sherbrooke, Québec Canada
                Article
                1942
                10.1186/s13054-018-1942-z
                5774146
                29347994
                551a7034-4b49-4e56-b441-57bc9304f447
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 7 November 2017
                : 3 January 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000028, Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health;
                Award ID: 376770
                Funded by: Merck-Sharp-Dhome FMSS
                Award ID: 2014
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: CRCHUS2016
                Award ID: PAFI
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004489, Mitacs;
                Award ID: IT05862
                Award ID: IT08045
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002790, Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada;
                Award ID: SEP-NSERC (EGP488509-15)
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Viewpoint
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                apelinergic system,apelin (apj) receptor,biased signaling,decatecholaminization,inodilator,septic shock

                Comments

                Comment on this article