70
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Journal of Pain Research (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on reporting of high-quality laboratory and clinical findings in all fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Sign up for email alerts here.

      52,235 Monthly downloads/views I 2.832 Impact Factor I 4.5 CiteScore I 1.2 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.655 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nucleotides Cytidine and Uridine Associated with Vitamin B12 vs B-Complex Vitamins in the Treatment of Low Back Pain: The NUBES Study

      case-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          We report the results of low back pain treatment using a combination of nucleotides, uridine (UTP), cytidine (CMP) and vitamin B 12, vs a combination of vitamins B 1, B 6, and B 12.

          Patients and Methods

          Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, of a 60-day oral treatment: Group A (n=317) receiving nucleotides+B 12 and Group B (n=317) receiving B vitamins. The primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects in each group presenting adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at Visit 2 (day 30) and Visit 3 (day 60) in relation to pretreatment values, Roland–Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) scores and finger-to-floor distance (FFD) (percentage of subjects per group presenting improvement ≥5 points and ≥3cm, respectively).

          Results

          Seventy-five (24%) and 105 (33%) subjects ( P=0.21) presented 133 and 241 AEs, with 3159% of subjects presenting ≥2 AEs ( P=0.0019) in Group A and Group B, respectively. Twenty-four subjects in Group B were discontinued due to AEs, while no AE-related discontinuations occurred in Group A ( P<0.0001). VAS score reduction after 30 and 60 days of treatment was statistically significant ( P<0.0001) in both groups, with Group A showing greater reduction at Visit 2 ( P<0.0001). RMQ score improvement ≥5 points occurred in 99% of subjects from each group, and FFD improvement ≥3 cm occurred in all subjects.

          Conclusion

          Treatment with nucleotides+B 12 was associated with a lower number of total AEs, fewer AEs per subject, and no AE-related treatment discontinuation. Pain intensity (VAS) reduction was superior at 30 days of treatment in the nucleotides+B 12 group and equivalent between groups at 60 days of treatment. Improvements in efficacy measures RMQ and FFD were observed in both groups at treatment days 30 and 60.

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Non-specific low back pain.

          Non-specific low back pain affects people of all ages and is a leading contributor to disease burden worldwide. Management guidelines endorse triage to identify the rare cases of low back pain that are caused by medically serious pathology, and so require diagnostic work-up or specialist referral, or both. Because non-specific low back pain does not have a known pathoanatomical cause, treatment focuses on reducing pain and its consequences. Management consists of education and reassurance, analgesic medicines, non-pharmacological therapies, and timely review. The clinical course of low back pain is often favourable, thus many patients require little if any formal medical care. Two treatment strategies are currently used, a stepped approach beginning with more simple care that is progressed if the patient does not respond, and the use of simple risk prediction methods to individualise the amount and type of care provided. The overuse of imaging, opioids, and surgery remains a widespread problem.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Epidemiology of low back pain.

            Low back pain is an extremely common problem that most people experience at some point in their life. While substantial heterogeneity exists among low back pain epidemiological studies limiting the ability to compare and pool data, estimates of the 1 year incidence of a first-ever episode of low back pain range between 6.3% and 15.4%, while estimates of the 1 year incidence of any episode of low back pain range between 1.5% and 36%. In health facility- or clinic-based studies, episode remission at 1 year ranges from 54% to 90%; however, most studies do not indicate whether the episode was continuous between the baseline and follow-up time point(s). Most people who experience activity-limiting low back pain go on to have recurrent episodes. Estimates of recurrence at 1 year range from 24% to 80%. Given the variation in definitions of remission and recurrence, further population-based research is needed to assess the daily patterns of low back pain episodes over 1 year and longer. There is substantial information on low back pain prevalence and estimates of the point prevalence range from 1.0% to 58.1% (mean: 18.1%; median: 15.0%), and 1 year prevalence from 0.8% to 82.5% (mean: 38.1%; median: 37.4%). Due to the heterogeneity of the data, mean estimates need to be interpreted with caution. Many environmental and personal factors influence the onset and course of low back pain. Studies have found the incidence of low back pain is highest in the third decade, and overall prevalence increases with age until the 60-65 year age group and then gradually declines. Other commonly reported risk factors include low educational status, stress, anxiety, depression, job dissatisfaction, low levels of social support in the workplace and whole-body vibration. Low back pain has an enormous impact on individuals, families, communities, governments and businesses throughout the world. The Global Burden of Disease 2005 Study (GBD 2005) is currently making estimates of the global burden of low back pain in relation to impairment and activity limitation. Results will be available in 2011. Further research is needed to help us understand more about the broader outcomes and impacts from low back pain. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Pain Res
                J Pain Res
                jpr
                jpainres
                Journal of Pain Research
                Dove
                1178-7090
                13 October 2020
                2020
                : 13
                : 2531-2541
                Affiliations
                [1 ]UNIFESO Medical School , Teresópolis, Brazil
                [2 ]UERJ Medical School , Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
                [3 ]Instituto De Pós-Graduação Médica Carlos Chagas (ICC) , Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
                [4 ]Federal University of Rio De Janeiro (UFRJ) , Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
                [5 ]New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill-Cornell Medical Center , New York, NY, USA
                [6 ]Neurology Department, UConn Health , Farmington, CT, USA
                [7 ]Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School , Newark, NJ, USA
                [8 ]Pathology Department, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) Medical School , Niterói, Brazil
                [9 ]Tufts Medical Center , Boston, MA, USA
                [10 ]Santa Casa Da Misericórdia Do Rio De Janeiro , Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Mauro Geller Av. Ataulfo de Paiva, 135/702 Rio de Janeiro, 22440-901, BrazilTel +55-21-3875-6660 Email maurogeller@gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7761-8499
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-312X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0458-8414
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4186-377X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8866-5661
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7671-1026
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-9247
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5108-5054
                Article
                277024
                10.2147/JPR.S277024
                7568635
                5539c443-a6af-4fb8-971e-2eab4eb6bc67
                © 2020 Mibielli et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 14 August 2020
                : 08 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 8, References: 37, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Clinical Trial Report

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                low back pain,uridine,cytidine,vitamin b1,vitamin b6,vitamin b12
                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                low back pain, uridine, cytidine, vitamin b1, vitamin b6, vitamin b12

                Comments

                Comment on this article