46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Emotional Health of People with Visual Impairment Caused by Retinitis Pigmentosa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To understand the emotional difficulties associated with living with the ocular condition Retinitis Pigmentosa, and to examine the functioning of a self-report instrument used to assess this construct.

          Methods

          The difficulty of goals and tasks in the emotional health domain of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory were rated by 166 people with Retinitis Pigmentosa in a cross-sectional study. Demographic factors were also assessed.

          Results

          Responses to the 23 emotional health tasks were Rasch analysed and could be used to form either one 20 item overview scale with some multidimensionality, or three unidimensional subscales addressing feelings (4 items), communicating visual loss (5 items) and fatigue (7 items). The most difficult individual tasks related to communicating visual loss to other people, and dealing with feelings such as frustration, anxiety and stress. The use of mobility aids and female gender were associated with increased difficulty with emotional health, explaining 19% of the variance in the overview scale.

          Conclusions

          The emotional health domain of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory is a valid tool to assess emotional difficulties arising from visual loss. Interventions to aid people with Retinitis Pigmentosa deal with emotional difficulties should particularly address communicating vision loss effectively to others and coping with negative feelings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: review and recommendations.

          The aim of this article was to systematically review all the available ophthalmic patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments (questionnaires) that demonstrated interval measurement properties to identify the instruments with the highest psychometric quality for use in different eye diseases and conditions. An extensive literature review was carried out to identify all existing ophthalmic PRO instruments. Instruments were then excluded if they did not have demonstrable interval measurement properties; the remaining instruments were reviewed. The quality of the following psychometric properties was assessed: content development (initial item development process), performance of the response scale, dimensionality (whether the instrument measures a single construct), measurement precision, validity (convergent, concurrent, discriminant, and known groups), reliability (test-retest), targeting (whether the items are appropriate [e.g., difficulty level] for the population), differential item functioning (whether subgroups of people respond differently to an item), and responsiveness. The search identified 48 PRO instruments that demonstrated interval measurement properties, and these were relevant to nine applications: glaucoma, dry eye, refractive errors, cataract, amblyopia and strabismus, macular diseases, adult low vision, children low vision, and others. These instruments were evaluated against the psychometric property quality criteria and were rated for quality based on the number of criteria met. This review provides a descriptive catalog of ophthalmic PRO instruments to inform researchers and clinicians on the choice of the highest-quality PRO instrument suitable for their purpose.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Burden of illness and suicide in elderly people: case-control study.

            To study the association between physical illness and suicide in elderly people. Case-control with illness determined from interviews with relatives of people who committed suicide and with control participants and from medical records. Gothenburg and two surrounding counties (210 703 people aged 65 years and over). Consecutive records of people who had committed suicide and had undergone forensic examination (46 men, 39 women) and living control participants from the tax register (84 men, 69 women). Physical illness rated in 13 organ systems according to the cumulative illness rating scale-geriatrics; serious physical illness (organ category score 3 or 4); overall score for burden of physical illness. Visual impairment (odds ratio 7.0, 95% confidence interval 2.3 to 21.4), neurological disorders (3.8, 1.5 to 9.4), and malignant disease (3.4, 1.2 to 9.8) were associated with increased risk for suicide. Serious physical illness in any organ category was an independent risk factor for suicide in the multivariate regression model (6.4, 2.0 to 20.0). When the sexes were analysed separately, serious physical illness was associated with suicide in men (4.2, 1.8 to 9.5) as was high burden of physical illness (2.8, 1.2 to 6.5). Such associations were not seen in women, possibly because of the small sample size. Visual impairment, neurological disorders, and malignant disease were independently associated with increased risk of suicide in elderly people. Serious physical illness may be a stronger risk factor for suicide in men than in women.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Longitudinal relationships among visual acuity, daily functional status, and mortality: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study.

              Determination of the mechanisms by which visual loss increases mortality risk is important for developing interventional strategies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                29 December 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 12
                : e0145866
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Visual Function and Physiology Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Vision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Sport and Exercise Science Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, GERMANY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: KL MB MT SP. Performed the experiments: MB. Analyzed the data: KL MB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KL MT SP. Wrote the paper: KL MB MT SP.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-39662
                10.1371/journal.pone.0145866
                4705104
                26713624
                554f5441-70cd-4856-86c7-b628ef67e6d2
                © 2015 Latham et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 9 September 2015
                : 9 December 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 8, Pages: 17
                Funding
                MB was supported by an Anglia Ruskin University Bursary. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                Data have been deposited to Figshare: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1536762.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article