63
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      On the Accentuation of Vedic - ti-Abstracts : Evidence for Accentual Change

      research-article
      Indo-European Linguistics
      Brill
      accentuation, Vedic, ablaut, diachronic prosody, lexical phonology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper offers a new explanation for the barytone and oxytone accents attested for the Vedic - ti-stems. The two accents are commonly taken to derive from separate reflexes of a once unified proterokinetic paradigm, and it is against this account I will propose the divergence is instead chronological: oxytones belong to the oldest layer of the Vedas, barytones to the younger. The diachronic change we observe occurs within the Vedic period, and is localized to the accentual properties associated with the suffix - ti-. Our philological analysis of the - ti-stems across Vedic texts will support the “compositional approach” championed recently by Kiparsky (2010) and Kümmel (2014) against previous approaches. Finally, I will suggest answers to the question of how the accentual properties of - ti- changed based on recent research into the lexical phonology of accent systems.

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The past and future of the past tense.

          What is the interaction between storage and computation in language processing? What is the psychological status of grammatical rules? What are the relative strengths of connectionist and symbolic models of cognition? How are the components of language implemented in the brain? The English past tense has served as an arena for debates on these issues. We defend the theory that irregular past-tense forms are stored in the lexicon, a division of declarative memory, whereas regular forms can be computed by a concatenation rule, which requires the procedural system. Irregulars have the psychological, linguistic and neuropsychological signatures of lexical memory, whereas regulars often have the signatures of grammatical processing. Furthermore, because regular inflection is rule-driven, speakers can apply it whenever memory fails.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            22125892
            Indo-European Linguistics
            IEUL
            Brill (The Netherlands )
            2212-5884
            2212-5892
            2015
            : 3
            : 1
            : 42-72
            Affiliations
            Article
            10.1163/22125892-00301006
            55810c4a-50d6-4fe1-82fc-840eed8b3362
            Copyright 2015 by Jesse Lundquist

            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) License.

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode

            History

            General linguistics,Linguistics & Semiotics,Languages of Europe,Theoretical frameworks and disciplines
            accentuation,diachronic prosody,lexical phonology,Vedic,ablaut

            Comments

            Comment on this article