58
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Methotrexate an Old Drug with New Tricks

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Methotrexate (MTX) is the first line drug for the treatment of a number of rheumatic and non-rheumatic disorders. It is currently used as an anchor disease, modifying anti-rheumatic drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the development of numerous new targeted therapies, MTX remains the backbone of RA therapy due to its potent efficacy and tolerability. There has been also a growing interest in the use of MTX in the treatment of chronic viral mediated arthritis. Many viruses—including old world alphaviruses, Parvovirus B19, hepatitis B/C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus—have been associated with arthritogenic diseases and reminiscent of RA. MTX may provide benefits although with the potential risk of attenuating patients’ immune surveillance capacities. In this review, we describe the emerging mechanisms of action of MTX as an anti-inflammatory drug and complementing its well-established immunomodulatory activity. The mechanisms involve adenosine signaling modulation, alteration of cytokine networks, generation of reactive oxygen species and HMGB1 alarmin suppression. We also provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of MTX toxic effects. Lastly, we discussed the efficacy, as well as the safety, of MTX used in the management of viral-related rheumatic syndromes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references218

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          NF-kappaB in inflammatory bowel disease.

          Apart from genetic and environmental factors, the mucosal immune system of the gut plays a central role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In the healthy gut, the mucosal immune system ensures the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators and thereby allows an effective defence against luminal pathogens but at the same time prevents an overwhelming immune reaction directed against the huge amount of harmless luminal antigens (for example, components of food or nonpathological bacteria). In both entities of IBD (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) this immunological balance is severely impaired and shifted towards the pro-inflammatory side. The chronic mucosal inflammation in IBD is caused by hyperactivation of effector immune cells, which produce high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines like tumour necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6 and interferon-gamma, resulting in colonic tissue damage. The nuclear transcription factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) was identified as one of the key regulators in this immunological setting. Its activation is markedly induced in IBD patients and through its ability to promote the expression of various pro-inflammatory genes, NF-kappaB strongly influences the course of mucosal inflammation. Considering the different cell-type specific effects which are mediated by NF-kappaB, this review aims at describing the complex role of NF-kappaB in IBD and discusses existing pharmacological attempts to block the activation of NF-kappaB to develop new therapeutic strategies in IBD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Side effects of methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rheumatoid arthritis therapy reappraisal: strategies, opportunities and challenges.

              Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is considered a chronic disease that cannot be cured. Biologic agents have enabled good therapeutic successes; however, the response to biologic therapy depends on treatment history and, especially, disease duration. In general, the more drug-experienced the patients, the lower the response rates, although this limitation can be overcome by promptly adjusting or switching treatment in a treat-to-target approach. Another challenge is the question of how long therapy should be continued once the treatment target, which should be remission or at least a state of low disease activity, has been reached. The data available suggest that, in most patients with established disease, cessation of biologic therapy will be followed by disease flares, whereas a reduction of dose or an increase in the interval between doses enables maintenance of treatment success. Induction therapy very early in the disease course followed by withdrawal of the biologic agent might also be a feasible approach to attain sustained good outcomes, but currently available data are not strong enough to allow for such a conclusion to be reached. Taken together, this underscores the importance of research into the cause(s) of RA so that curative therapies can be developed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                10 October 2019
                October 2019
                : 20
                : 20
                : 5023
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unité Mixte de Recherche Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical (PIMIT), INSERM U1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249, Université de La Réunion—Plateforme Technologique CYROI—2, rue Maxime Rivière, 97490 Sainte-Clotilde, France; yosra.bedoui.bouhouch@ 123456gmail.com (Y.B.); jimmy.selambarom@ 123456univ-reunion.fr (J.S.); pascale.guiraud@ 123456univ-reunion.fr (P.G.)
                [2 ]Service de Rhumatologie, CHU La Réunion site Félix Guyon, Allée des Topazes, CS11021, 97400 Saint Denis de La Réunion, France; xavier.guillot@ 123456chu-reunion.fr
                [3 ]Laboratoire de biologie, CNR associé des arbovirus, CHU La Réunion site Félix Guyon, Allée des Topazes, CS11021, 97400 Saint Denis de La Réunion, France; claude.giry@ 123456chu-reunion.fr (C.G.); marie-christine.jaffarbandjee@ 123456chu-reunion.fr (M.C.J.-B.)
                [4 ]Service de Rhumatologie—Médecine Interne, CHU Morafeno, Route d’Ivoloina 501, Toamasina, Madagascar; stephane_ralandison@ 123456yahoo.fr
                [5 ]Pôle de Biologie, secteur Laboratoire d’Immunologie Clinique et Expérimentale de la zone de l’Océan Indien (LICE-OI), CHU La Réunion site Félix Guyon, Allée des Topazes, CS11021, 97400 Saint Denis de La Réunion, France
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4286-0063
                Article
                ijms-20-05023
                10.3390/ijms20205023
                6834162
                31658782
                55ce2921-5ff0-44bf-b4a1-f36c93ba4ab7
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 23 July 2019
                : 30 September 2019
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular biology
                methotrexate,arthritis,inflammation,alarmin,virus,chikungunya,rheumatoid arthritis,innate immunity,pharmacology

                Comments

                Comment on this article