22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of concurrent chemotherapy on definitive radiotherapy for women with FIGO IIIb cervical cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate the impact of concurrent chemotherapy on definitive radiotherapy for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIIb cervical cancer. Between 2000 and 2009, 131 women with FIGO IIIb cervical cancer were treated by definitive radiotherapy (i.e. whole pelvic external beam radiotherapy for 40–60 Gy in 20–30 fractions with or without center shielding and concomitant high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy with 192-iridium remote after loading system for 6 Gy to point A of the Manchester method). The concurrent chemotherapy regimen was cisplatin (40 mg/m 2/week). After a median follow-up period of 44.0 months (range 4.2–114.9 months) and 62.1 months for live patients, the five-year overall survival (OS), loco-regional control (LRC) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 52.4, 80.1 and 59.9%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that lack of concurrent chemotherapy was the most significant factor leading to poor prognosis for OS (HR = 2.53; 95% CI 1.44–4.47; P = 0.001) and DMFS (HR = 2.53; 95% CI 1.39–4.61; P = 0.002), but not for LRC (HR = 1.57; 95% CI 0.64–3.88; P = 0.322). The cumulative incidence rates of late rectal complications after definitive radiotherapy were not significantly different with or without concurrent chemotherapy (any grade at five years 23.9 vs 21.7%; P = 0.669). In conclusion, concurrent chemotherapy is valuable in definitive radiotherapy for Japanese women with FIGO IIIb cervical cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01.

          To report mature results of a randomized trial that compared extended-field radiotherapy (EFRT) versus pelvic radiotherapy with concomitant fluorouracil and cisplatin (CTRT) in women with locoregionally advanced carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Four hundred three women with cervical cancer were randomly assigned to receive either EFRT or CTRT. Patients were eligible if they had stage IIB to IVA disease, stage IB to IIA disease with a tumor diameter > or = 5 cm, or positive pelvic lymph nodes. Patients were stratified by stage and by method of lymph node evaluation. The median follow-up time for 228 surviving patients was 6.6 years. The overall survival rate for patients treated with CTRT was significantly greater than that for patients treated with EFRT (67% v 41% at 8 years; P <.0001). There was an overall reduction in the risk of disease recurrence of 51% (95% CI, 36% to 66%) for patients who received CTRT. Patients with stage IB to IIB disease who received CTRT had better overall and disease-free survival than those treated with EFRT (P <.0001); 116 patients with stage III to IVA disease had better disease-free survival (P =.05) and a trend toward better overall survival (P =.07) if they were randomly assigned to CTRT. The rate of serious late complications of treatment was similar for the two treatment arms. Mature analysis confirms that the addition of fluorouracil and cisplatin to radiotherapy significantly improved the survival rate of women with locally advanced cervical cancer without increasing the rate of late treatment-related side effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            The US National Cancer Institute alert in February, 1999, stated that concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be considered for all patients with cervical cancer. Our aim was to review the effects of chemoradiotherapy on overall and progression-free survival, local and distant control, and acute and late toxicity in patients with cervical cancer. With the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration, we did a systematic review of all known randomised controlled trials done between 1981 and 2000 (17 published, two unpublished) of chemoradiation for cervical cancer. The trials included 4580 randomised patients, and 2865-3611 patients (62-78%) were available for analysis. Cisplatin was the most common agent used. The findings suggest that chemoradiation improves overall survival (hazard ratio 0.71, p<0.0001), whether platinum was used (0.70, p<0.0001) or not (0.81, p=0.20). A greater beneficial effect was seen in trials that included a high proportion of stage I and II patients (p=0.009). An improvement in progression-free survival was also seen with chemoradiation (0.61, p<0.0001). Thus, the absolute benefit in progression-free and overall survival was 16% (95% CI 13-19) and 12% (8-16), respectively. A significant benefit of chemoradiation on both local (odds ratio 0.61, p<0.0001) and distant recurrence (0.57, p<0.0001) was also recorded. Grade 3 or 4 haematological (odds ratio 1.49-8.60) and gastrointestinal (2.22) toxicities were significantly greater in the concomitant chemoradiation group than the control group. There was insufficient data to establish whether late toxicity was increased in the concomitant chemoradiation group. Concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy improves overall and progression-free survival and reduces local and distant recurrence in selected patients with cervical cancer, which may give a cytotoxic and sensitisation effect.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The importance of hemoglobin levels during radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix.

              It is unclear whether blood transfusion can overcome the negative impact of anemia before or during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the impact of anemia and blood transfusion on 605 patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated with radical RT at 7 centers across Canada in 1989, 1990, and 1992. The data collected included hemoglobin (Hgb) levels from the time of diagnosis to the end of therapy; blood transfusions administered; and identifiable patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors. Survival, disease free survival, and pelvic control analyses were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 0-92 months). Presenting Hgb level, average weekly nadir Hgb (AWNH) during RT, and blood transfusion were correlated significantly with local control, disease free survival, and overall survival on univariate analysis. However, the AWNH remained significant on multivariate analysis, whereas Hgb at presentation and blood transfusion did not. The 5-year survival was 74% for patients with an AWNH >/= 120 g/L, 52% for patients with AWNH levels 110-119 g/L inclusive, and 45% for patients with AWNH levels /= 120 g/L compared with < 120 g/L. A reduction in the rate of distant recurrence was observed in patients with and without pelvic recurrence. AWNH is highly predictive of outcome for patients treated with RT for carcinoma of the cervix. Blood transfusion appears to overcome the negative prognostic effects of low presenting Hgb levels and AWNH levels. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Radiat Res
                J. Radiat. Res
                radres
                jrr
                Journal of radiation research
                Oxford University Press
                0449-3060
                1349-9157
                July 2012
                15 June 2012
                : 53
                : 4
                : 588-593
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
                [2 ]Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
                [3 ]Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 104-0045; Tel: 81-(3)3542-2511; Fax: 81-(3)3545-3567; Email: yuuki.kuroda.96@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                rrs010
                10.1093/jrr/rrs010
                3393347
                22843624
                5613088c-76b9-482b-85f4-91339274a845
                © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 October 2011
                : 20 January 2012
                : 7 February 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Categories
                Oncology

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cervical cancer,iiib,chemotherapy,radiotherapy,hdr
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cervical cancer, iiib, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hdr

                Comments

                Comment on this article