15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Disruption of multisystem responses to stress in type 2 diabetes: Investigating the dynamics of allostatic load

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Our observations provide evidence to link epidemiological studies implicating stress-related processes with biological dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. The patterns of cardiovascular, inflammatory, neuroendocrine, and cholesterol responses exemplify the disturbances of reactivity and recovery predicted by the allostatic load model, including prolonged responses to stress due to delayed shutdown of physiological reactivity, and inadequate (blunted) responses resulting in compensatory hyperactivity in other mediating pathways. Chronic allostatic load may be a mechanism through which stress exposures contribute to diabetes risk, while also being implicated in the adverse health consequences of diabetes such as coronary heart disease and cognitive decline.

          Abstract

          Psychological stress-related processes are thought to contribute to the development and progression of type 2 diabetes, but the biological mechanisms involved are poorly understood. Here, we tested the notion that people with type 2 diabetes experience chronic allostatic load, manifest as dynamic disturbances in reactivity to and recovery from stress across multiple (cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, inflammatory, metabolic) biological systems, coupled with heightened experience of chronic life stress. We carried out an experimental comparison of 140 men and women aged 50–75 y with type 2 diabetes and 280 nondiabetic individuals matched on age, sex, and income. We monitored blood pressure (BP) and heart rate, salivary cortisol, plasma interleukin (IL)-6, and total cholesterol in response to standardized mental stress, and assessed salivary cortisol over the day. People with type 2 diabetes showed impaired poststress recovery in systolic and diastolic BP, heart rate and cholesterol, and blunted stress reactivity in systolic BP, cortisol, cholesterol, and IL-6. Cortisol and IL-6 concentrations were elevated, and cortisol measured over the day was higher in the type 2 diabetes group. Diabetic persons reported greater depressive and hostile symptoms and greater stress experience than did healthy controls. Type 2 diabetes is characterized by disruption of stress-related processes across multiple biological systems and increased exposure to life stress. Chronic allostatic load provides a unifying perspective with implications for etiology and patient management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present, and future.

          Glucose metabolism is normally regulated by a feedback loop including islet β cells and insulin-sensitive tissues, in which tissue sensitivity to insulin affects magnitude of β-cell response. If insulin resistance is present, β cells maintain normal glucose tolerance by increasing insulin output. Only when β cells cannot release sufficient insulin in the presence of insulin resistance do glucose concentrations rise. Although β-cell dysfunction has a clear genetic component, environmental changes play an essential part. Modern research approaches have helped to establish the important role that hexoses, aminoacids, and fatty acids have in insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, and the potential role of changes in the microbiome. Several new approaches for treatment have been developed, but more effective therapies to slow progressive loss of β-cell function are needed. Recent findings from clinical trials provide important information about methods to prevent and treat type 2 diabetes and some of the adverse effects of these interventions. However, additional long-term studies of drugs and bariatric surgery are needed to identify new ways to prevent and treat type 2 diabetes and thereby reduce the harmful effects of this disease. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy.

            It is hypothesized that collective efficacy, defined as social cohesion among neighbors combined with their willingness to intervene on behalf of the common good, is linked to reduced violence. This hypothesis was tested on a 1995 survey of 8782 residents of 343 neighborhoods in Chicago, Illinois. Multilevel analyses showed that a measure of collective efficacy yields a high between-neighborhood reliability and is negatively associated with variations in violence, when individual-level characteristics, measurement error, and prior violence are controlled. Associations of concentrated disadvantage and residential instability with violence are largely mediated by collective efficacy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators.

              B S McEwen (1998)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                November 04 2014
                October 20 2014
                November 04 2014
                : 111
                : 44
                : 15693-15698
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; and
                [2 ]Institute of Psychology, University of Zurich, CH-8050 Zürich, Germany
                Article
                10.1073/pnas.1410401111
                4226108
                25331894
                561d485d-8ff4-4dc8-905d-12017627ec2b
                © 2014
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article