4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Undergraduate education of trauma and orthopaedic surgery in the UK : a systematic review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Evidence exists of a consistent decline in the value and time that medical schools place upon their undergraduate orthopaedic placements. This limited exposure to trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) during medical school will be the only experience in the speciality for the majority of doctors. This review aims to provide an overview of undergraduate orthopaedic training in the UK.

          Methods

          This review summarizes the relevant literature from the last 20 years in the UK. Articles were selected from database searches using MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, Cochrane, and Web of Science. A total of 16 papers met the inclusion criteria.

          Results

          The length of exposure to T&O is declining; the mean total placement duration of two to three weeks is significantly less than the four- to six-week minimum advised by most relevant sources. The main teaching methods described in the literature included didactic lectures, bedside teaching, and small group case-based discussions. Students preferred interactive, blended learning teaching styles over didactic methods. This improvement in satisfaction was reflected in improvements in student assessment scores. However, studies failed to assess competencies in clinical skills and examinations, which is consistent with the opinions of UK foundation year doctors, approximately 40% of whom report a “poor” understanding of orthopaedics. Furthermore, the majority of UK doctors are not exposed to orthopaedics at the postgraduate level, which only serves to amplify the disparity between junior and generalist knowledge, and the standards expected by senior colleagues and professional bodies.

          Conclusion

          There is a deficit in undergraduate orthopaedic training within the UK which has only worsened in the last 20 years, leaving medical students and foundation doctors with a potentially significant lack of orthopaedic knowledge.

          Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):549–556.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

            David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

              The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. Here, we present the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present examples from published reviews. We hope that changes to the content and structure of PRISMA 2020 will facilitate uptake of the guideline and lead to more transparent, complete, and accurate reporting of systematic reviews.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Foundation Year 2 Doctor
                Role: Medical Student
                Role: Medical Student
                Role: Medical Student
                Role: Medical Student
                Journal
                Bone Jt Open
                Bone Jt Open
                BJO
                Bone & Joint Open
                The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery (London )
                2633-1462
                01 July 2022
                July 2022
                : 3
                : 7
                : 549-556
                Affiliations
                [1 ] org-divisionTrauma Unit , org-divisionUniversity of Wales Hospital , Cardiff, UK
                [2 ] org-divisionCardiff University School of Medicine , Cardiff, UK
                [3 ] org-divisionAbility Medical Education , Cardiff, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be sent to Arwel T. Poacher. E-mail: drarwelpoacher@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4200-4929
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7902-8182
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1497-8902
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-1591
                Article
                BJO-3-549
                10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0044.R1
                9350698
                35818794
                56244799-e3be-402b-8a7d-b6ad06c3ccd6
                © 2022 Author(s) et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Total Disc Replacement
                Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
                Degenerative Spine Disease
                Meta-Analysis
                Systematic Review
                bj17439, Trauma
                bj11416, Orthopaedic treatments
                bj9776, Medical specialists
                bj4445, Diagnostic and analytical techniques in orthopaedics
                bj11388, Orthopaedic diseases
                bj1268, Arthroplasty
                bj11413, Orthopaedic surgical procedures
                bj9780, MEDLINE
                bj3454, Clinicians
                bj10593, Musculoskeletal conditions
                bj10605, Musculoskeletal medicine
                bj10595, Musculoskeletal examination
                bj6688, Healthcare professionals
                bj14031, Rheumatology
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                $2.00
                The University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
                Systematic Review
                None declared.

                medical education,undergraduate,training,orthopaedic,surgical education,trauma,orthopaedic surgery,medline,clinicians,musculoskeletal conditions,musculoskeletal medicine,musculoskeletal examinations,healthcare professionals,rheumatology,arthroplasty

                Comments

                Comment on this article